Table 2 |
|||
|
Distribution of Wolbachia within populations of H. e. chestertonii and H. e. venus |
|||
|
Population (Individuals analized) |
Negative diagnostic (Females/Males) |
Clade-A (Females/Males) |
Clade-B (Females/Males) |
|
|
|||
|
Marsella (33) |
9/18 |
3/3 |
|
|
Trujillo (13) |
2/10 |
0/1 |
|
|
Yotoco (4) |
1/3 |
||
|
Buenos Aires (22) |
6/10 |
0/1 |
1/0 |
|
Carbonero (14) |
6/6 |
1/1 |
|
|
Caimital (15) |
0/9 |
3/3 |
|
|
Atucela (20) |
4/16 |
||
|
Miravalle (21) |
8/12 |
0/1 |
|
|
Montañitas (20) |
10/9 |
0/1 |
|
|
La cumbre (14) |
4/10 |
||
|
Saladito (10) |
0/9 |
1/0 |
|
|
Pance (28) |
11/17 |
||
|
Villa Colombia (19) |
6/13 |
||
|
Calima River valley (44) |
12/31 |
1*/0 |
|
|
Juanchaco (29) |
6/23 |
||
|
|
|||
|
The asterisk indicates the only infected individual of H. e. venus. |
|||
|
Muñoz et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:358 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-358 |
|||
