Table 2

Effects of Sire and Dam lines, thermal Treatment, Replicate (Repl), and their interactions, on the expression of the offspring morphological traits.

Estimate

SE

F

p-value

Percent


Treatment

F1,11 = 1.70

P = 0.2191


Dam

0

.

.

.

0

Sire

0.004325

0.005812

0.74

0.2284

4.82760

Dam * sire

0

.

.

.

0

Dam * Treatment

0.009832

0.007858

1.25

0.1054

10.97456

Pronotum Width (male)

Sire * Treatment

0

.

.

.

0

Dam * Sire * Treatment

0.02045

0.008901

2.30

0.0108

22.82646

Repl (dam * sire)

0.004050

0.004928

0.82

0.2056

4.52064

Treatment * Repl (dam*sir)

0.004772

0.006953

0.69

0.2462

5.32655

Residual

0.04616

0.003236

14.27

<.0001

51.52418


Treatment

F1,7.33 = 2.95

P = 0.1277


Dam

0

.

.

.

0

Sire

0.000522

0.000550

0.95

0.1717

6.90020

Dam * sire

0

0

.

.

0

Body Mass (male)

Dam * Treatment

0.000459

0.000621

0.74

0.2301

6.06742

Sire * Treatment

3.39E-53

.

.

.

0

Dam * Sire * Treatment

0.001596

0.000783

2.04

0.0208

21.09716

Repl (dam * sire)

0

.

.

.

0

Treatment * Repl (dam*sire)

0.000798

0.000542

1.47

0.0703

10.54858

Residual

0.004190

0.000296

14.17

<.0001

55.38665


Treatment

F1,2.78 = 2.78

P = 0.2222


Dam

4.158E-6

3.879E-6

1.07

0.1419

14.28621

Sire

6.728E-6

4.599E-6

1.46

0.0717

23.11630

Dam * sire

0

.

.

.

0.00000

Testis Mass

Dam * Treatment

1.375E-6

2.417E-6

0.57

0.2847

4.72427

Sire * Treatment

4.35E-7

1.685E-6

0.57

0.2847

1.49459

Dam * Sire * Treatment

4.539E-6

2.261E-6

2.01

0.0223

15.59526

Repl (dam * sire)

3.38E-7

1.394E-6

0.24

0.4042

1.16131

Treatment * Repl (dam*sire)

1.532E-6

1.861E-6

0.82

0.2051

5.26370

Residual

0.000010

0

.

.

34.35836


Treatment

F1,12.6 = 0.15

P = 0.7046


Dam

.

.

.

.

0

Sire

0

.

.

.

0

Dam * sire

0

.

.

.

8.19016

Pronotum width (female)

Dam * Treatment

0.007346

0.006882

1.07

0.1429

13.56851

Sir * Treatment

0.01217

0.008006

1.52

0.0643

7.30157

Dam * Sire * Treatment

0.006549

0.009757

0.67

0.2511

4.25674

Repl (dam * sire)

0.003818

0.006471

0.59

0.2776

23.44665

Treatment * Repl (dam*sire)

0.02103

0.01195

1.76

0.0392

43.23637

Residual

0.03878

0.002572

15.08

<.0001

0


Treatment

F1,12 = 6.16

P = 0.0289


Dam

0

.

0.46

0.3223

0

Sire

0

.

.

.

0

Dam * sire

0.000068

0.001001

0.07

0.4728

0.69772

Body Mass (female)

Dam * Treatment

0.000449

0.000526

0.85

0.1967

4.60702

Sire * Treatment

0.001171

0.000812

1.44

0.0746

12.01519

Dam * Sire* Treatment

0.000735

0.001667

0.44

0.3296

7.54156

Repl (dam * sire)

0.000549

0.000956

0.57

0.2827

5.63308

Treatment * Repl (dam*sire)

0.002090

0.001397

1.50

0.0673

21.44470

Residual

0.004684

0.000313

14.96

<.0001

48.06074


Treatment

F1,11.8 = 24.65

P = 0.0003


Dam

0

.

.

.

0

Sire

0

.

.

.

0

Dam * sire

0.000071

0.000113

0.63

0.2369

4.80704

Ovary Mass

Dam * Treatment

0.000042

0.000046

0.93

0.1775

2.84360

Sire * Treatment

0.000159

0.000095

1.68

0.0463

10.76506

Dam * Sire * Treatment

0

.

.

.

0

Repl (dam * sire)

0.000215

0.000134

1.61

0.0535

14.55653

Treatment * Repl (dam*sire)

0.000052

0.000076

0.68

0.2470

3.52065

Residual

0.000938

0.000062

15.10

<.0001

63.50711


Sire and Dam lines were treated as Random effects in the model and Thermal Treatment as a fixed effect. Fixed effect parameter estimates are displayed above the hatched lined for each trait (in italics). The percentage of total phenotypic variance explained by each random effects term and interaction is denoted in the right hand column of the table.

Nystrand et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:222   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-222

Open Data