Table 3

Comparisons of the proportion of Osvaldo and Isis among chromosomes

Osvaldo

Isis


Chromosomes

Exp. Prop.

IN

JA

IN

JA


X

0.156

0.05

0.04

0.03

0.02

2

0.253

0.58

0.63

0.25

0.22

3

0.207

0.15

0.09

0.37

0.44

4

0.186

0.12

0.15

0.06

0.10

5

0.197

0.11

0.09

0,29

0.22


Df

Ga

4

59.44**

130.70**

99.87**

96.09**

(5.36)

(10.59)

(30.49**)

(32.13**)

Gb

1

13.32**

21.53**

42.32**

42.39 **

(3.88)

(5.54)

(16.49**)

(18.46**)

Gc

3

46.12**

82.16**

57.55**

53.70**

(1.47)

(5.05)

(14.00)

(13.67*)


Ga

Total

8

163.13** (15.95)

195.97**(62.62**)

Pooled

4

159.94** (13.53**)

189.88**(54.35**)

H

4

3.19 (2.42)

6.08 (8.27)

Gb

Total

2

34.85**(9.42*)

84.71** (34.95**)

Pooled

1

34.67**(9.37**)

84.64** (34.89**)

H

1

0.18 (0.009)

0.08 (0.06)

Gc

Total

6

128.28**(6.53)

111.25**(27.67**)

Pooled

3

125.28**(4.17)

105.25** (19.46**)

H

3

3.0 (2.36)

6.00(8.21)


Exp. Prop.: Expected TE proportions; Ga: Comparison of the proportion of TEs among chromosomes; Gb: Comparison of the proportion of TEs between chromosome X and autosomes; Gc: Comparison of the proportion of TEs among autosomes; H: Heterogeneity; Df: degrees of freedom;*P < 0.05; **P < 0.01; Bonferroni's correction was applied. Values of the test excluding high insertion frequency sites are indicated in parenthesis.

GarcĂ­a Guerreiro and Fontdevila BMC Evolutionary Biology 2011 11:111   doi:10.1186/1471-2148-11-111

Open Data