Table 6 |
||
|
Statistical comparisons among 15 alternative tree topologies of the four more derived suborders using AU test |
||
|
Treea |
Diff -ln L |
P |
|
|
||
|
(Og,(An,(Ch,Ce))) b |
0.0 |
0.589 |
|
((Og,An)(Ch,Ce)) c |
0.0 |
0.577 |
|
(An,(Og,(Ch,Ce))) |
0.5 |
0.520 |
|
(Og,(Ce,(An,Ch))) |
22.4 |
0.030 |
|
(Og,(Ch,(An,Ce))) |
27.5 |
0.006 |
|
(An,(Ce,(Ch,Og))) |
42.5 |
0.015 |
|
(An,(Ch,(Og,Ce))) d |
43.8 |
0.002 |
|
((An,Ch)(Og,Ce)) |
47.9 |
0.000 |
|
(Ce,(Og,(An,Ch))) |
48.9 |
0.000 |
|
((An,Ce)(Ch,Og)) |
49.7 |
0.002 |
|
(Ch,(Og,(An,Ce))) |
50.4 |
0.000 |
|
(Ch,(Ce,(An,Og))) |
53.2 |
0.004 |
|
(Ce,(Ch,(An,Og))) |
54.2 |
0.008 |
|
(Ce,(An,(Og,Ch))) |
54.6 |
0.000 |
|
(Ch,(An,(Og,Ce))) |
55.1 |
0.002 |
|
|
||
|
a Ogcocephaloidei (Og); Antennarioidei (An); Chaunacoidei (Ch); Ceratioidei (Ce). The most basal Lophioidei was excluded from the comparisons b The best-scoring ML tree derived from 12n3rRTn (Figure 5) and 12nRTn datasets. c The best-scoring ML tree derived from 123nRTn dataset. d Morphology-based hypothesis [3] |
||
|
Miya et al. BMC Evolutionary Biology 2010 10:58 doi:10.1186/1471-2148-10-58 |
||
