Methodology article

Single cell cytometry of protein function in RNAi treated cells and in native populations

Peter LaPan¹ , Jing Zhang² , Jing Pan² , Andrew Hill³ and Steven A Haney^2,4

¹Department of Biological Technologies, Section of Biologic Research, Wyeth Research, 87 Cambridge Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA

²Department of Biological Technologies, Oncology Research, Wyeth Research, 87 Cambridge Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA

³Department of Biological Technologies, Bioinformatics, Wyeth Research, 87 Cambridge Park Drive, Cambridge, MA 02140, USA

⁴Pfizer Research Technology Center, 620 Memorial Drive, Cambridge, MA 02139

author email corresponding author email

BMC Cell Biology 2008, 9:43doi:10.1186/1471-2121-9-43

Published:	1 August 2008

Abstract

Background

High Content Screening has been shown to improve results of RNAi and other perturbations, however significant intra-sample heterogeneity is common and can complicate some analyses. Single cell cytometry can extract important information from subpopulations within these samples. Such approaches are important for immune cells analyzed by flow cytometry, but have not been broadly available for adherent cells that are critical to the study of solid-tumor cancers and other disease models.

Results

We have directly quantitated the effect of resolving RNAi treatments at the single cell level in experimental systems for both exogenous and endogenous targets. Analyzing the effect of an siRNA that targets GFP at the single cell level permits a stronger measure of the absolute function of the siRNA by gating to eliminate background levels of GFP intensities. Extending these methods to endogenous proteins, we have shown that well-level results of the knockdown of PTEN results in an increase in phospho-S6 levels, but at the single cell level, the correlation reveals the role of other inputs into the pathway. In a third example, reduction of STAT3 levels by siRNA causes an accumulation of cells in the G1 phase of the cell cycle, but does not induce apoptosis or necrosis when compared to control cells that express the same levels of STAT3. In a final example, the effect of reduced p53 levels on increased adriamycin sensitivity for colon carcinoma cells was demonstrated at the whole-well level using siRNA knockdown and in control and untreated cells at the single cell level.

Conclusion

We find that single cell analysis methods are generally applicable to a wide range of experiments in adherent cells using technology that is becoming increasingly available to most laboratories. It is well-suited to emerging models of signaling dysfunction, such as oncogene addition and oncogenic shock. Single cell cytometry can demonstrate effects on cell function for protein levels that differ by as little as 20%. Biological differences that result from changes in protein level or pathway activation state can be modulated directly by RNAi treatment or extracted from the natural variability intrinsic to cells grown under normal culture conditions.