Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Cell Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Comparative study of mesenchymal stem cells from C57BL/10 and mdx mice

Yong Li2, Cheng Zhang12*, Fu Xiong2, Mei-juan Yu2, Fu-lin Peng1, Yan-chang Shang1, Cui-ping Zhao1, Yong-feng Xu4, Zheng-shan Liu2, Chang Zhou1 and Jin-lang Wu3

Author affiliations

1 Department of Neurology, the First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ProC

2 Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering Research Center, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ProC

3 Department of electron microscope, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, Guangdong, ProC

4 Department of Neurology, Second Affiliated Hospital, College of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, ProC

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Cell Biology 2008, 9:24  doi:10.1186/1471-2121-9-24

Published: 19 May 2008

Abstract

Background

Human mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been studied and applied extensively because of their ability to self-renew and differentiate into various cell types. Since most human diseases models are murine, mouse MSCs should have been studied in detail. The mdx mouse – a Duchenne muscular dystrophy model – was produced by introducing a point mutation in the dystrophin gene. To understand the role of dystrophin in MSCs, we compared MSCs from mdx and C57BL/10 mice, focusing particularly on the aspects of light and electron microscopic morphology, immunophenotyping, and differentiation potential.

Results

Our study showed that at passage 10, mdx-MSCs exhibited increased heterochromatin, larger vacuoles, and more lysosomes under electron microscopy compared to C57BL/10-MSCs. C57BL/10-MSCs formed a few myotubes, while mdx-MSCs did not at the same passages. By passage 21, mdx-MSCs but not C57BL/10-MSCs had gradually lost their proliferative ability. In addition, a significant difference in the expression of CD34, not Sca-1 and CD11b, was observed between the MSCs from the 2 mice.

Conclusion

Our current study reveals that the MSCs from the 2 mice, namely, C57BL/10 and mdx, exhibit differences in proliferative and myogenic abilities. The results suggest that the changes in mouse MSC behavior may be influenced by lack of dystrophin protein in mdx mouse.