Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Cell Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Common themes and cell type specific variations of higher order chromatin arrangements in the mouse

Robert Mayer1, Alessandro Brero1, Johann von Hase2, Timm Schroeder3, Thomas Cremer1 and Steffen Dietzel1*

  • * Corresponding author: Steffen Dietzel dietzel@lmu.de

  • † Equal contributors

Author affiliations

1 Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biologie II, Groβhaderner Str 2, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany

2 Kirchhoff Institut für Physik, Universität Heidelberg, Germany

3 Institute of Stem Cell Research, GSF – National Research Center for Environment and Health, Neuherberg, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

Citation and License

BMC Cell Biology 2005, 6:44  doi:10.1186/1471-2121-6-44

Published: 7 December 2005

Abstract

Background

Similarities as well as differences in higher order chromatin arrangements of human cell types were previously reported. For an evolutionary comparison, we now studied the arrangements of chromosome territories and centromere regions in six mouse cell types (lymphocytes, embryonic stem cells, macrophages, fibroblasts, myoblasts and myotubes) with fluorescence in situ hybridization and confocal laser scanning microscopy. Both species evolved pronounced differences in karyotypes after their last common ancestors lived about 87 million years ago and thus seem particularly suited to elucidate common and cell type specific themes of higher order chromatin arrangements in mammals.

Results

All mouse cell types showed non-random correlations of radial chromosome territory positions with gene density as well as with chromosome size. The distribution of chromosome territories and pericentromeric heterochromatin changed during differentiation, leading to distinct cell type specific distribution patterns. We exclude a strict dependence of these differences on nuclear shape. Positional differences in mouse cell nuclei were less pronounced compared to human cell nuclei in agreement with smaller differences in chromosome size and gene density. Notably, the position of chromosome territories relative to each other was very variable.

Conclusion

Chromosome territory arrangements according to chromosome size and gene density provide common, evolutionary conserved themes in both, human and mouse cell types. Our findings are incompatible with a previously reported model of parental genome separation.