Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Cell Biology and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Analysis of Sec61p and Ssh1p interactions in the ER membrane using the split-ubiquitin system

Carol Harty12 and Karin Römisch13*

Author Affiliations

1 Cambridge Institute for Medical Research, Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 2XY, UK

2 Current address: Sauder School of Business, Henry Angus Building, 2053 Main Mall, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z2, Canada

3 Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Biology, Saarland University, Campus A1.5, Saarbruecken, 66123, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Cell Biology 2013, 14:14  doi:10.1186/1471-2121-14-14

Published: 11 March 2013

Abstract

Background

The split-ubiquitin system monitors interactions of transmembrane proteins in yeast. It is based on the formation of a quasi-native ubiquitin structure upon interaction of two proteins to which the N- and C-terminal halves of ubiquitin have been fused. In the system we use here ubiquitin formation leads to proteolytic cleavage liberating a transcription factor (PLV) from the C-ubiquitin (C) fusion protein which can then activate reporter genes. Generation of fusion proteins is, however, rife with problems, and particularly in transmembrane proteins often disturbs topology, structure and function.

Results

We show that both the Sec61 protein which forms the principal protein translocation channel in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane, and its non-essential homologue, Ssh1p, when fused C-terminally to CPLV are inactive. In a heterozygous diploid Sec61-CPLV is present in protein translocation channels in the ER membrane without disturbing their function and displays a limited set of protein-protein interactions similar to those found for the wildtype protein using biochemical methods. Although its expression level is similar, Ssh1-CPLV interactions are less strong, and, in contrast to Sec61p, Ssh1p does not distinguish between Sbh1p and Sbh2p. We show that interactions can be monitored by reporter gene activity or directly by PLV cleavage, which is more sensitive, but leads to quantitatively different results.

Conclusions

We conclude that the split-ubiquitin system we used here has high fidelity, but low sensitivity and is of limited use for detection of new, transient interactions with protein translocation channels in the ER membrane.

Keywords:
Protein translocation; Endoplasmic Reticulum; Sec61 channel; Split-ubiquitin system