Table 1 |
|||||||
|
Computation Performance. Computation performance in each method. Analyzed haplotype window types were consecutive window haplotypes (ConsWH) and combinational window haplotypes (CombWH). Fold acceleration is defined as actual elapsed time divided by accumulated time for each process. Acceleration linearity is defined as fold acceleration divided by number of used compute-nodes. 22 nodes are used for analysis except five nodes for the Unphased CombWH analysis. |
|||||||
|
program |
option |
analyzed haplotype |
window size |
elapsed time |
accumulated time |
fold acceleration |
acceleration linearity |
|
|
|||||||
|
FBAT |
-e |
ConsWH |
1–26 |
2.2 min |
31.7 min |
14.4 |
65.5% |
|
FBAT |
-e |
CombWH |
1–5 |
1.9 min |
30.3 min |
15.9 |
72.3% |
|
Unphased |
-uncertain |
ConsWH |
1–17 |
69.9 day |
909.0 day |
13.0 |
59.1% |
|
Unphased |
-certain |
ConsWH |
1–26 |
13.8 min |
256.1 min |
18.6 |
84.5% |
|
Unphased |
-certain |
CombWH |
1–5 |
6.5 day |
7.2 day |
1.1 |
22.0% |
|
|
|||||||
|
Mishima et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9(Suppl 6):S10 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-S6-S10 |
|||||||