Table 2

Number of Clusters for Hierarchical Cluster Methods and Tree Cutting Strategies at 1%FPR.

Group

Tree Cutting Strategy

Hierarchical Cluster Method

VAST Nres

VAST Pcli

SHEBA Nres

SHEBA Zscore

DALI Nres

DALI Zscore


2

Level

Average

460

573

576

402

444

389

2

Level

Complete

307

250

332

195

221

396

2

Level

Single

810

1023

921

686

787

1041

2

Level

Ward

110

120

138

106

113

121

3

Largest Size

Average

183

210

222

190

169

256

3

Largest Size

Complete

81

84

88

94

69

82

3

Largest Size

Single

515

658

528

420

439

792

3

Largest Size

Ward

71

79

81

71

67

72

3

Tree Completeness

Ward

95

89

87

88

101

96

3

Highest tree

Ward

88

80

84

81

92

91

1

Tree skewness

Ward

603

701

603

592

606

641

1

Longest node

Ward

409

704

627

837

646

991

2

Maximum Entropy

Ward

143

146

109

101

81

109

1

BestTPR

Ward

1121

1112

1054

1106

1185

1029

4

Best ratio TPR &FPR

Ward

59

65

70

61

57

63

4

MI

Ward

105

76

72

68

55

77


Sam et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9:74   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-74

Open Data