Table 1

The results of 100 HMM-SA runs.

Combination


H4ac, H3ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3

43

98.8%/94.5%


H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3

8

99.1%/93.2%


H4ac, H3ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3

6

99.1%/94.1%


H3Kme1, H3K4me2

6

99.7%/92.8%


H4ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3,

5

100%/93.5%


H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3

5

100%/93.0%


H3ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3, H3

5

99.2%/94.6%


H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3

5

99.6%/94.6%


H4ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3

4

100.0%/93.2%


H4ac, H3ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3K4me3

3

98.1%/94.6%


H4ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2

3

100%/94.6%


H4ac, H3ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me3, H3

2

97.2%/93.2%


H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3

2

100.0%/93.2%


H4ac, H3K4me3

1

96.2%/91.9%


H3ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2

1

98.1%/94.6%


H3ac, H3Kme1, H3K4me2, H3

1

100.0%/94.6%


Window Size

Number of times used

Prediction rate (promoter/enhancer)


1 K

8

99.3%/93.6%


2 K

75

99.0%/94.3%


4 K

7

99.7%/93.4%


8 K

7

99.5%/93.1%


10 K

2

100%/91.9%


12 K

1

98.1%/89.2%


Won et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9:547   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-547

Open Data