Table 2 |
||||
|
Estimated flux ratios from GC-MS measurements of B. subtilis. |
||||
|
flux ratios |
our fw (UL) |
our fw (1CL) |
FiatFlux (UL) |
FiatFlux (1CL) |
|
|
||||
|
PYR from MAL : PYR from PEP |
0.01 : 0.99 |
0.04 : 0.96 |
||
|
OAA from TCA-cycle : OAA from PYR |
0.42 : 0.58 |
0.37 : 0.63 |
0.41 : 0.59 |
|
|
PEP from OAA : PEP from GA3P |
0 : 1 |
0 : 1 |
0.04 :0.96 |
0 : 1 |
|
GLY from SER : GLY from C1 + CO2 |
1 : 0 |
1 : 0 |
1 : 0 |
|
|
SER from GLY : SER from GA3P |
0.09 : 0.91 |
0.14 : 0.86 |
||
|
|
||||
|
Directly comparable flux ratios computed from the GC-MS data described by the framework presented in this paper (our fw) and by FiatFlux software [30]. UL denotes uniform labelling of external glucose, 1CL external glucose labelled to the first carbon position. |
||||
|
Rantanen et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2008 9:266 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-266 |
||||
