BMC Bioinformatics Volume 9
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
 Methodology articleExon level integration of proteomics and microarray dataDanny A Bitton* 1 , Michał J Okoniewski* 1 , Yvonne Connolly2 and Crispin J Miller1  1Cancer Research UK, Applied Computational Biology and Bioinformatics Group, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, The University of Manchester, Christie Hospital Site, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK 2Cancer Research UK, Proteomics Service, Paterson Institute for Cancer Research, The University of Manchester, Christie Hospital Site, Wilmslow Road, Manchester, M20 4BX, UK author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally
BMC Bioinformatics 2008,
9:118doi:10.1186/1471-2105-9-118
|
|
| Published: |
25 February 2008 |
Abstract
Background
Previous studies comparing quantitative proteomics and microarray data have generally found poor correspondence between the two. We hypothesised that this might in part be because the different assays were targeting different parts of the expressed genome and might therefore be subjected to confounding effects from processes such as alternative splicing.
Results
Using a genome database as a platform for integration, we combined quantitative protein mass spectrometry with Affymetrix Exon array data at the level of individual exons. We found significantly higher degrees of correlation than have been previously observed (r = 0.808). The study was performed using cell lines in equilibrium in order to reduce a major potential source of biological variation, thus allowing the analysis to focus on the data integration methods in order to establish their performance.
Conclusion
We conclude that part of the variation observed when integrating microarray and proteomics data may occur as a consequence both of the data analysis and of the high granularity to which studies have until recently been limited. The approach opens up the possibility for the first time of considering combined microarray and proteomics datasets at the level of individual exons and isoforms, important given the high proportion of alternative splicing observed in the human genome. |