BMC Bioinformatics
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Methodology articleStatistical tests to compare motif count exceptionalitiesStéphane Robin1 , Sophie Schbath2 and Vincent Vandewalle1  1
INA PG/ENGREF/INRA, UMR518 Unité Mathématiques et Informatique Appliquées, 75005 Paris, France 2
INRA, UR1077 Unité Mathématique, Informatique et Génome, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France author email corresponding author email
BMC Bioinformatics 2007,
8:84doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-84 Abstract
Background
Finding over- or under-represented motifs in biological sequences is now a common task in genomics. Thanks to p-value calculation for motif counts, exceptional motifs are identified and represent candidate functional motifs. The present work addresses the related question of comparing the exceptionality of one motif in two different sequences. Just comparing the motif count p-values in each sequence is indeed not sufficient to decide if this motif is significantly more exceptional in one sequence compared to the other one. A statistical test is required.
Results
We develop and analyze two statistical tests, an exact binomial one and an asymptotic likelihood ratio test, to decide whether the exceptionality of a given motif is equivalent or significantly different in two sequences of interest. For that purpose, motif occurrences are modeled by Poisson processes, with a special care for overlapping motifs. Both tests can take the sequence compositions into account. As an illustration, we compare the octamer exceptionalities in the Escherichia coli K-12 backbone versus variable strain-specific loops.
Conclusion
The exact binomial test is particularly adapted for small counts. For large counts, we advise to use the likelihood ratio test which is asymptotic but strongly correlated with the exact binomial test and very simple to use. |