|
Clinical characteristics of k = 2,3,7 clusters: The ER, PR, Her2, Node, stage and grade status of the samples in each cluster are shown for k = 2,3 and 7. ND stands for "Not Determined". At k = 2, the clustering splits the data into normal samples and disease samples (BCA), except for one ADH which is classified with the normals. At k = 3, the BCA samples split into high grade (grade 2 or 3) and low grade (grade 1 or 2) categories. At k = 7, the low grade samples split into two clusters LG1, LG2 and the high grade into four: HG1 – HG4. The HG1 samples are all ER-, PR- and mostly Her2-. The HG3 and HG4 clusters are mostly ER+, PR+, Her2-. The HG2 cluster has mixed ER, PR and Her2 signatures. Using the Sorlie et al classification, we identify HG1 as the Basal-like subtype; LG1 as Luminal A; LG2, HG3 and HG4 as Luminal B and HG2 as the Her2+ subtype. When the sum of the entries for ER/PR/Her2/Node/Grade do not add up to the size of the cluster, it is because the corresponding information was missing in the dataset [10]. |
||||||||||||||||||||
| Cluster level k |
Group |
Size |
Stage |
ER |
PR |
Her2 |
Node |
Grade |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| ADH |
DCIS |
IDC |
N |
Pos |
Neg |
ND |
Pos |
Neg |
ND |
Pos |
Neg |
ND |
Pos |
Neg |
1 |
2 |
3 |
|||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
| 2 |
N |
33 |
1 |
32 |
||||||||||||||||
| BCA |
60 |
7 |
30 |
23 |
47 |
10 |
3 |
42 |
15 |
3 |
10 |
37 |
9 |
44 |
14 |
18 |
22 |
19 |
||
| 3 |
LG |
28 |
7 |
13 |
8 |
26 |
2 |
21 |
5 |
2 |
4 |
18 |
6 |
20 |
8 |
18 |
9 |
|||
| HG |
32 |
17 |
15 |
21 |
10 |
1 |
21 |
10 |
1 |
6 |
19 |
3 |
24 |
6 |
13 |
19 |
||||
| 7 |
LG1 |
11 |
4 |
5 |
2 |
11 |
8 |
3 |
1 |
10 |
7 |
4 |
9 |
2 |
||||||
| LG2 |
17 |
3 |
8 |
6 |
15 |
2 |
13 |
2 |
2 |
3 |
8 |
6 |
13 |
4 |
9 |
7 |
||||
| HG1 |
5 |
2 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
1 |
4 |
3 |
5 |
|||||||||||
| HG2 |
10 |
7 |
3 |
7 |
3 |
5 |
5 |
3 |
4 |
1 |
9 |
1 |
2 |
8 |
||||||
| HG3 |
13 |
6 |
7 |
10 |
2 |
1 |
12 |
1 |
2 |
7 |
2 |
10 |
3 |
7 |
6 |
|||||
| HG4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
4 |
4 |
2 |
2 |
4 |
|||||||||||
Dalgin et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2007 8:291 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-8-291 |
||||||||||||||||||||