Table 3 |
||||
|
Comparison on specificity and sensitivity between D-MOTIF and D-STAR |
||||
|
(l, d) |
D-MOTIF |
D-STAR |
||
|
|
||||
|
Spec |
Sens |
Spec |
Sens |
|
|
|
||||
|
(6, 1) |
99.69% |
100% |
95.16% |
99.1% |
|
(7, 1) |
100% |
100% |
99.89% |
100% |
|
(8, 1) |
100% |
100% |
100% |
100% |
|
|
||||
|
This table, in conjunction with Figure 8 showed that D-STAR runs orders of magnitude faster than D-MOTIF while sacrificing a small amount of accuracy in terms of sensitivity and specificity. |
||||
|
Tan et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7:502 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-502 |
||||
