Table 7

The 51 genes contributing the most to the non-ethanol signature as defined by the maximum curvature in Figure 13 B.

Gene Name

Rank

Expression Ratio

Gene Name

Rank

Expression Ratio

Gene Name

Rank

Expression Ratio


ygjK

1

-20.9

nagE

18

-4.8

ygfK

35

-6.6

tktA

2

-5.2

kdpB

19

-4.0

trpD

36

-8.7

dsbC

3

-8.5

tufA

20

-2.0

gshA

37

-1.8

cvrA

4

-2.3

alsE

21

-14.8

yejA

38

-4.7

nrfE

5

-11.9

aidB

22

-4.3

rplX

39

-2.8

yehI

6

-19.2

fusA

23

-2.9

ygbE

40

-7.9

ybbA

7

-4.1

ybhH

24

-5.7

yqjI

41

-4.2

evgS

8

-16.2

ybeQ

25

-6.3

glnS

42

-2.1

ynfE

9

-14.4

rplO

26

-5.0

yoaD

43

-240.1

pqiB

10

-3.7

betT

27

-2.4

cyaA

44

-4.4

bglA

11

-2.0

leuA

28

-4.1

amiA

45

-3.4

dnaN

12

-1.7

norV

29

-2.9

lon

46

-6.4

feoB

13

-25.9

deaD

30

-2.2

yhgF

47

-3.4

yphG

14

-7.0

tufB

31

-1.8

hscC

48

-22.1

arcB

15

-10.4

gppA

32

-4.8

infC

49

-1.8

rne

16

-6.9

alaS

33

-5.0

yfiE

50

-5.8

yehU

17

-3.8

rplD

34

-7.7

rplP

51

-4.7


Expression ratios are calculated by dividing as the average expression level of a gene in the 8 cultures not exposed to ethanol by the average expression level in the 4 ethanol-challenged cultures. A negative sign has been included to indicate that these genes are down-regulated as the result of the ethanol challenge.

Rollins et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7:377   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-377

Open Data