Table 2 |
|||
|
Summary of PROMPT's generic comparison methods and the corresponding examples presented. The symbol x in the data column means corresponding data values for the same protein, whereas a comma simply states that two sets of values are utilized. |
|||
|
Example |
Type of data used |
PROMPT methoda: |
Applied statistical methods d |
|
|
|||
|
Fold comparison of GroEL substrates with the whole proteome |
{ Nominal }, { Nominal } |
Categorical feature comparison b |
• Chi-Square test |
|
Fold enrichment of GroEL substrates |
{ Nominal }, subset of { Nominal } |
Categorical feature enrichment c |
• Sampling from hypergeometric distribution with correction |
|
Abundance distribution of essential vs. all proteins |
{ Numeric }, { Numeric } |
Numeric distribution comparison |
• Mann-Whitney (MW) and Kolmogorov-Smirnov (KS) of the whole distribution • MW and Chi-Square test of each bin separately |
|
Protein abundance vs. mRNA expression |
{ Numeric × Numeric } |
Numeric feature correlation |
• Pearson correlation coefficient and • Pearson correlation test |
|
|
|||
|
a Extensive description of each method can be found in the context sensitive help integrated in the PROMPT GUI, or in the manual supplied with PROMPT. b Both groups with categorical data can be independent from each other. c One group must be drawn from the other group. d As described in the Methods section |
|||
|
Schmidt and Frishman BMC Bioinformatics 2006 7:331 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-331 |
|||