BMC Bioinformatics Volume 7
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools:Post to:
|
Methodology articleEmpirical validation of the S-Score algorithm in the analysis of gene expression dataRichard E Kennedy1 , Kellie J Archer1,4 and Michael F Miles2,3,4  1Department of Biostatistics, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA 2Department of Pharmacology and Toxicology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA 3Department of Neurology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA 4Center for the Study of Biological Complexity, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA author email corresponding author email
BMC Bioinformatics 2006,
7:154doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-154 Abstract
Background
Current methods of analyzing Affymetrix GeneChip® microarray data require the estimation of probe set expression summaries, followed by application of statistical tests to determine which genes are differentially expressed. The S-Score algorithm described by Zhang and colleagues is an alternative method that allows tests of hypotheses directly from probe level data. It is based on an error model in which the detected signal is proportional to the probe pair signal for highly expressed genes, but approaches a background level (rather than 0) for genes with low levels of expression. This model is used to calculate relative change in probe pair intensities that converts probe signals into multiple measurements with equalized errors, which are summed over a probe set to form the S-Score. Assuming no expression differences between chips, the S-Score follows a standard normal distribution, allowing direct tests of hypotheses to be made. Using spike-in and dilution datasets, we validated the S-Score method against comparisons of gene expression utilizing the more recently developed methods RMA, dChip, and MAS5.
Results
The S-score showed excellent sensitivity and specificity in detecting low-level gene expression changes. Rank ordering of S-Score values more accurately reflected known fold-change values compared to other algorithms.
Conclusion
The S-score method, utilizing probe level data directly, offers significant advantages over comparisons using only probe set expression summaries. |