Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Bioinformatics and BioMed Central.

This article is part of the supplement: Italian Society of Bioinformatics (BITS): Annual Meeting 2005

Open Access Research article

Modelling the interaction of steroid receptors with endocrine disrupting chemicals

Pasqualina D'Ursi1, Erika Salvi2, Paola Fossa3, Luciano Milanesi2 and Ermanna Rovida2*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Biomedical Sciences and Technologies, University of Milan, Segrate, Milan, 20090, Italy

2 Institute for Biomedical Technologies, National Research Council, Segrate, Milan, 20090, Italy

3 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Genova, Genova 16132, Italy

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2005, 6(Suppl 4):S10  doi:10.1186/1471-2105-6-S4-S10

Published: 1 December 2005

Abstract

Background

The organic polychlorinated compounds like dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane with its metabolites and polychlorinated biphenyls are a class of highly persistent environmental contaminants. They have been recognized to have detrimental health effects both on wildlife and humans acting as endocrine disrupters due to their ability of mimicking the action of the steroid hormones, and thus interfering with hormone response. There are several experimental evidences that they bind and activate human steroid receptors. However, despite the growing concern about the toxicological activity of endocrine disrupters, molecular data of the interaction of these compounds with biological targets are still lacking.

Results

We have used a flexible docking approach to characterize the molecular interaction of seven endocrine disrupting chemicals with estrogen, progesterone and androgen receptors in the ligand-binding domain. All ligands docked in the buried hydrophobic cavity corresponding to the hormone steroid pocket. The interaction was characterized by multiple hydrophobic contacts involving a different number of residues facing the binding pocket, depending on ligands orientation. The EDC ligands did not display a unique binding mode, probably due to their lipophilicity and flexibility, which conferred them a great adaptability into the hydrophobic and large binding pocket of steroid receptors.

Conclusion

Our results are in agreement with toxicological data on binding and allow to describe a pattern of interactions for a group of ECD to steroid receptors suggesting the requirement of a hydrophobic cavity to accommodate these chlorine carrying compounds. Although the affinity is lower than for hormones, their action can be brought about by a possible synergistic effect.