Table 4

SIGI's performance in predicting the donor genome for synthetic genes modelling the amelioration process.

Acceptor
Cut-off AMELI
Donor





I
II
III
IV
V
VI
VII
VIII

Mesorhizobium loti
0.05
0.50 7/2
0.50 69/1
0.50 34/11
0.50 26/1
0.50 115/0
0.10 1/2
0.50 54/89
0.50 51/52

0.10
0.75 286/16
0.75 329/3
0.50 82/17
0.50 298/7
0.50 360/7
0.50 399/6
0.50 154/251
0.50 193/265

0.25
0.75 360/23
0.75 359/3
0.50 90/20
0.95 485/8
0.25 58/8
0.50 482/7
0.50 161/259
0.50 207/277


0.95 476/13
0.95 486/2
0.95 489/7
0.95 485/8
0.95 497/1
0.95 499/0
0.95 499/0
0.95 302/198
Escherichia coli K-12
0.05
1.00 32/6
0.50 38/0
0.50 69/1
0.95 10/2
0.75 73/1
0.90 88/3
0.75 45/3
0.75 133/7

0.10
0.95 349/39
0.75 455/1
0.75 454/8
0.50 392/6
1.00 444/4
0.90 455/6
0.50 433/21
0.75 446/27

0.25
1.00 378/69
0.75 484/1
0.75 490/8
0.50 471/8
1.00 496/4
0.90 492/8
0.50 473/27
0.75 469/31


0.95 386/44
0.95 499/0
0.95 497/2
0.95 497/2
0.95 498/2
0.95 495/5
0.95 499/1
0.95 499/1
Pyrococcus horikoshii
0.05
0.75 134/1
0.50 1/0
0.75 5/0
0.50 8/0
0.75 98/2
0.75 58/1
0.50 23/11
0.90 303/84

0.10
0.75 389/1
0.95 358/2
0.75 137/0
0.50 120/1
0.75 455/8
0.75 440/5
0.50 258/153
0.90 381/110

0.25
0.75 411/1
0.95 466/2
0.50 23/0
0.50 177/1
0.75 484/9
0.75 494/6
0.50 324/176
0.90 388/112


0.95 498/0

0.95 428/0
0.95 500/0
0.95 494/6
0.95 496/4
0.95 476/26
0.95 460/40
Clostridium acetobutylicum
0.05
1.00 20/7
0.50 5/1
0.75 134/42
0.50 46/37
0.75 157/6
0.50 50/32
0.25 60/20
0.75 121/242

0.10
1.00 60/39
0.00 4/2
0.75 335/137
0.50 309/148
0.75 452/19
0.50 299/167
0.25 312/151
0.75 181/306

0.25
1.00 79/44
0.00 7/2
0.75 354/146
0.50 338/162
0.50 472/23
0.25 378/122
0.25 339/161
0.75 188/312


0.95 66/35
0.95 155/0
0.95 405/95
0.95 495/5
0.95 494/6
0.95 496/4
0.95 470/30
0.95 405/95

For each pair of donor and acceptor, the worst case is given for three values of AMELI. Each entry lists the fraction FRAC and the number of correct/incorrect prediction generated for a dataset consisting of 500 sequences. The last line gives the number of correct/incorrect predictions for a FRAC value of 0.95.

Merkl BMC Bioinformatics 2004 5:22   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-22