Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Bioinformatics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Research article

Comparison of computational methods for identifying translation initiation sites in EST data

Afshin Nadershahi1, Scott C Fahrenkrug2 and Lynda BM Ellis3*

Author Affiliations

1 College of Biological Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA

2 Department of Animal Science, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN 55108 USA

3 Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2004, 5:14  doi:10.1186/1471-2105-5-14

Published: 16 February 2004

Abstract

Background

Expressed Sequence Tag (EST) sequences are generally single-strand, single-pass sequences, only 200–600 nucleotides long, contain errors resulting in frame shifts, and represent different parts of their parent cDNA. If the cDNAs contain translation initiation sites, they may be suitable for functional genomics studies. We have compared five methods to predict translation initiation sites in EST data: first-ATG, ESTScan, Diogenes, Netstart, and ATGpr.

Results

A dataset of 100 EST sequences, 50 with and 50 without, translation initiation sites, was created. Based on analysis of this dataset, ATGpr is found to be the most accurate for predicting the presence versus absence of translation initiation sites. With a maximum accuracy of 76%, ATGpr more accurately predicts the position or absence of translation initiation sites than NetStart (57%) or Diogenes (50%). ATGpr similarly excels when start sites are known to be present (90%), whereas NetStart achieves only 60% overall accuracy. As a baseline for comparison, choosing the first ATG correctly identifies the translation initiation site in 74% of the sequences. ESTScan and Diogenes, consistent with their intended use, are able to identify open reading frames, but are unable to determine the precise position of translation initiation sites.

Conclusions

ATGpr demonstrates high sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy in identifying start sites while also rejecting incomplete sequences. A database of EST sequences suitable for validating programs for translation initiation site prediction is now available. These tools and materials may open an avenue for future improvements in start site prediction and EST analysis.