Table 5 |
||||
| Correlations between predicted GBVs for trait A, B and C | ||||
| Data | Method | A-B (0.72) | A-C (0.0) | B-C (0.0) |
| I | MCBayes π = 0 | 0.588 ± 0.181 | −0.071 ± 0.175 | −0.091 ± 0.199 |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.699 ± 0.188 | −0.057 ± 0.250 | −0.076 ± 0.301 | |
| varBayes π = 0 | 0.688 ± 0.184 | −0.100 ± 0.241 | −0.077 ± 0.279 | |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.644 ± 0.169 | −0.053 ± 0.192 | −0.058 ± 0.247 | |
| Single-trait (MCBayes) π = 0 | 0.446 ± 0.132 | 0.058 ± 0.096 | 0.096 ± 0.121 | |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.452 ± 0.183 | 0.035 ± 0.090 | 0.060 ± 0.111 | |
| Simulated BV | 0.755 ± 0.133 | 0.003 ± 0.054 | 0.004 ± 0.060 | |
| II | MCBayes π = 0 | 0.606 ± 0.197 | −0.129 ± 0.113 | −0.071 ± 0.140 |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.721 ± 0.222 | −0.161 ± 0.149 | −0.128 ± 0.179 | |
| varBayes π = 0 | 0.614 ± 0.206 | −0.176 ± 0.135 | −0.090 ± 0.179 | |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.671 ± 0.210 | −0.153 ± 0.168 | −0.047 ± 0.193 | |
| Single-trait (MCBayes) π = 0 | 0.394 ± 0.115 | 0.020 ± 0.075 | 0.072 ± 0.111 | |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.479 ± 0.206 | −0.018 ± 0.084 | 0.022 ± 0.094 | |
| Simulated BV | 0.735 ± 0.166 | −0.031 ± 0.054 | −0.012 ± 0.041 | |
| III | MCBayes π = 0 | 0.530 ± 0.195 | −0.032 ± 0.223 | −0.037 ± 0.238 |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.662 ± 0.208 | −0.014 ± 0.326 | −0.013 ± 0.369 | |
| varBayes π = 0 | 0.555 ± 0.194 | −0.028 ± 0.218 | −0.023 ± 0.248 | |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.455 ± 0.167 | −0.001 ± 0.158 | 0.021 ± 0.190 | |
| Single-trait (MCBayes) π = 0 | 0.315 ± 0.106 | 0.029 ± 0.105 | 0.080 ± 0.134 | |
| 0 < π <1 | 0.323 ± 0.138 | 0.024 ± 0.097 | 0.057 ± 0.130 | |
Averages and standard errors are listed based on 100 replicates of simulated data in Data I and Data III and 20 replicates in Data II. Simulated BV indicates simulated breeding values, where expected correlations are 0.72, 0.0 and 0.0 for trait-pairs A-B, A-C and B-C as listed in parentheses. In Data III, correlations between simulated breeding values are the same as those in Data I.
Hayashi and Iwata BMC Bioinformatics 2013 14:34 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-34