Table 2

Species-wise and overall comparisons between LASAGNA and ClustalW2
Species # better1 # ties2 # TFs3 p-value4
H. sapiens 54 (79.4%) 0 68 4.42×10−7
M. musculus 42 (79.2%) 0 53 1.41×10−5
D. melanogaster 22 (75.9%) 0 29 9.89×10−4
S. cerevisiae 9 (69.2%) 1 13 3.88×10−2
R. norvegicus 20 (76.9%) 1 26 1.54×10−3
Overall 147 (77.8%) 2 189 1.22×10−15

1. Number of TFs on which LASAGNA performs better than ClustalW2.

2. Number of TFs on which LASAGNA and ClustalW2 have the same performance.

3. Total number of TFs for a species.

4. Wilcoxon signed-rank test p-value.

Lee and Huang

Lee and Huang BMC Bioinformatics 2013 14:108   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-14-108

Open Data