Table 5 |
||||||
|
Comparison of two methods for predicting human proteins interacting with HPV proteins |
||||||
|
Test set |
Our representation |
Shen's representation |
||||
|
|
||||||
|
SN (%) |
SP (%) |
AC (%) |
SN (%) |
SP (%) |
AC (%) |
|
|
|
||||||
|
1 |
86.5 |
88.5 |
87.5 |
69.2 |
84.6 |
76.9 |
|
2 |
73.1 |
88.5 |
80.8 |
69.2 |
84.6 |
76.9 |
|
3 |
76.9 |
86.5 |
81.7 |
78.8 |
82.7 |
80.8 |
|
|
||||||
|
Average |
78.8 |
87.8 |
83.3 |
72.4 |
83.9 |
78.2 |
|
|
||||||
|
Comparison of our representation method with the method by Shen et al. [5] in terms of sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP) and accuracy (AC) with the HPV data. |
||||||
|
Cui et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13(Suppl 7):S5 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-S7-S5 |
||||||
