Table 1

Sensitivity and specificity of evolved SCFGs and other prediction methods
Grammar KH99 GG1 GG2 GG3 GG4 GG5 GG6 KH99 UNAfold RNAfold Pfold
Our data
Sensitivity 0.496 0.505 0.408 0.413 0.474 0.469 0.526
PPV 0.479 0.481 0.551 0.550 0.454 0.467 0.479
F–score 0.478 0.441 0.473 0.470 0.461 0.339 0.488
DE data
Sensitivity 0.465 0.466 0.372 0.379 0.408 0.487 0.465 0.47 0.558 0.558 0.39
PPV 0.406 0.405 0.643 0.646 0.344 0.432 0.376 0.45 0.501 0.495 0.69
F–score 0.480 0.468 0.466 0.472 0.430 0.479 0.451

The sensitivities, PPVs, and F–scores of grammars GG1–GG6 and KH99 on the evaluation set and on the on the [14] data, as well as the benchmarked sensitivities and PPVs of UNAfoldv3.8 and RNAfoldv1.85 on the [14] data. Results for KH99 and Pfold are taken from [14].

WJ Anderson et al.

WJ Anderson et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:78   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-78

Open Data