Table 1 |
|||
|
Summary of piRNA cluster identification methods and results from previous studies |
|||
|
study |
organism |
identified clusters |
criteria for detection of clusters |
|
|
|||
|
Aravin et al. 2006 [3] |
human/mouse |
14/42 |
at least 4 piRNA loci per cluster, maximum distance between two piRNA loci 15 kb |
|
|
|||
|
Girard et al. 2006 [4] |
human/mouse/rat |
186/123/157 |
at least 5 piRNA loci/5kb, at least 10 piRNA loci per cluster, only sequence reads that mapped 1-5 times to the genome were considered, sequence reads mapped to genome allowing up to 2 mismatches |
|
|
|||
|
Lau et al. 2006 [5] |
mouse/rat |
94/100 |
at least 20 single-copy loci, at least 1 piRNA locus/kb |
|
|
|||
|
Lakshmi and Agrawal 2007 [7] |
human/mouse/rat |
114/2710/189 |
at least n** single-copy loci/20kb, at least 2 piRNA loci/kb |
|
|
|||
|
Grivna et al. 2006 [12] |
mouse |
35 |
* |
|
|
|||
|
Watanabe et al. 2006 [13] |
mouse |
34 |
p < = 0.05, where p = (s/S)n-1×NCn S: genome size (bp), s: cluster size (bp), N: total number of sequence hits, n: number of hits in cluster |
|
|
|||
|
*method not explained in more detail, ** based on hit density for each organism [7]. |
|||
|
Rosenkranz and Zischler BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:5 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-5 |
|||