Table 3

Results of Experiment 2
Measure Ligand HEAD C4.5 <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M19','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M19">View MathML</a> <a onClick="popup('http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M20','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/13/310/mathml/M20">View MathML</a> t
Accuracy ETH 0.70 ± 0.02 0.62 ± 0.02 0.08 0.00074 6.28
PIF 0.87 ± 0.00 0.80 ± 0.02 0.06 0.00045 6.39
TCL 0.65 ± 0.02 0.57 ± 0.02 0.07 0.00022 10.85
NADH 0.75 ± 0.03 0.72 ± 0.02 0.03 0.00054 2.28
INH 0.83 ± 0.02 0.79 ± 0.01 0.04 0.00033 4.57
JPM 0.72 ± 0.02 0.65 ± 0.02 0.07 0.00061 5.90
Tree Size ETH 30.20 ± 38.09 539.80 ± 29.64 510.0 2147.38 23.95
PIF 17.80 ± 13.44 283.00 ± 39.97 265.2 1174.40 16.84
TCL 43.00 ± 37.49 588.00 ± 37.39 545.0 3193.11 20.99
NADH 87.00 ± 36.42 360.00 ± 22.33 273.0 2379.78 12.18
INH 42.80 ± 27.96 278.60 ± 24.80 235.8 1313.29 14.16
JPM 121.80 ± 65.60 483.80 ± 19.76 362.0 4152.00 12.23

Table 3 presents the classification accuracy and tree size of HEAD-DT and C4.5 in the ETH, PIF, TCL, NADH, INH, and JPM data sets. HEAD-DT results were obtained by running an evolved decision-tree algorithm tailored to each data set.

Barros et al.

Barros et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:310   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-310

Open Data