Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Bioinformatics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Research article

Frnakenstein: multiple target inverse RNA folding

Rune B Lyngsø1, James WJ Anderson1*, Elena Sizikova2, Amarendra Badugu3, Tomas Hyland4 and Jotun Hein1

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Statistics, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3TG, UK

2 Department of Computer Science, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3QD, UK

3 ETH Zürich, Department of Biosystems Science and Engineering, 4058 Basel, Switzerland

4 Mathematics Institute, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3LB, UK

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2012, 13:260  doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-260

Published: 9 October 2012

Abstract

Background

RNA secondary structure prediction, or folding, is a classic problem in bioinformatics: given a sequence of nucleotides, the aim is to predict the base pairs formed in its three dimensional conformation. The inverse problem of designing a sequence folding into a particular target structure has only more recently received notable interest. With a growing appreciation and understanding of the functional and structural properties of RNA motifs, and a growing interest in utilising biomolecules in nano-scale designs, the interest in the inverse RNA folding problem is bound to increase. However, whereas the RNA folding problem from an algorithmic viewpoint has an elegant and efficient solution, the inverse RNA folding problem appears to be hard.

Results

In this paper we present a genetic algorithm approach to solve the inverse folding problem. The main aims of the development was to address the hitherto mostly ignored extension of solving the inverse folding problem, the multi-target inverse folding problem, while simultaneously designing a method with superior performance when measured on the quality of designed sequences. The genetic algorithm has been implemented as a Python program called Frnakenstein. It was benchmarked against four existing methods and several data sets totalling 769 real and predicted single structure targets, and on 292 two structure targets. It performed as well as or better at finding sequences which folded in silico into the target structure than all existing methods, without the heavy bias towards CG base pairs that was observed for all other top performing methods. On the two structure targets it also performed well, generating a perfect design for about 80% of the targets.

Conclusions

Our method illustrates that successful designs for the inverse RNA folding problem does not necessarily have to rely on heavy biases in base pair and unpaired base distributions. The design problem seems to become more difficult on larger structures when the target structures are real structures, while no deterioration was observed for predicted structures. Design for two structure targets is considerably more difficult, but far from impossible, demonstrating the feasibility of automated design of artificial riboswitches. The Python implementation is available at http://www.stats.ox.ac.uk/research/genome/software/frnakenstein webcite.

Keywords:
RNA; Inverse folding; Genetic algorithm; Riboswitch