Table 1 |
|||||||||||||
| Detection accuracy and computation time of four methods on simulated normal samples | |||||||||||||
| CNV size | CNV type | PennCNV | CBS | Fused Lasso | Group Fused Lasso | ||||||||
| TPR | FDR | TPR | FDR | TPR | FDR | TPR | FDR | ||||||
| 5 | Deletion | 83.80 | 4.92 | 78.20 | 0.68 | 63.93 | 1.74 | 64.27 | 1.83 | ||||
| Duplication | 58.53 | 4.67 | 11.67 | 10.26 | 20.00 | 37.76 | 39.87 | 14.33 | |||||
| 10 | Deletion | 95.03 | 1.45 | 88.37 | 0.56 | 88.50 | 0.60 | 88.87 | 0.56 | ||||
| Duplication | 93.43 | 0.78 | 56.50 | 4.40 | 83.90 | 12.60 | 91.60 | 3.85 | |||||
| 20 | Deletion | 94.63 | 0.58 | 90.50 | 0.39 | 90.80 | 0.47 | 90.83 | 0.47 | ||||
| Duplication | 96.13 | 0.92 | 86.22 | 3.58 | 92.77 | 4.95 | 94.98 | 2.13 | |||||
| 30 | Deletion | 94.57 | 0.28 | 93.30 | 0.29 | 89.38 | 0.52 | 89.77 | 0.53 | ||||
| Duplication | 96.09 | 0.05 | 90.77 | 1.61 | 94.32 | 1.78 | 94.98 | 1.29 | |||||
| 40 | Deletion | 97.83 | 0.59 | 97.58 | 0.09 | 97.28 | 0.19 | 97.28 | 0.19 | ||||
| Duplication | 94.61 | 0.46 | 92.77 | 0.98 | 93.94 | 1.15 | 94.63 | 0.75 | |||||
| 50 | Deletion | 94.33 | 0.07 | 92.76 | 0.04 | 90.47 | 0.11 | 90.48 | 0.11 | ||||
| Duplication | 94.50 | 0.09 | 93.81 | 0.74 | 93.11 | 0.79 | 93.64 | 0.49 | |||||
| Overall Deletion | 95.02 | 0.55 | 93.06 | 0.19 | 91.08 | 0.33 | 91.19 | 0.34 | |||||
| Overall Duplication | 93.82 | 0.44 | 86.92 | 1.55 | 90.56 | 2.85 | 92.46 | 1.38 | |||||
| Overall | 94.42 | 0.49 | 89.99 | 0.85 | 90.82 | 1.60 | 91.83 | 0.87 | |||||
| Time (sec.) | 0.48 (0.01) | 0.78 (0.69) | 0.22 (0.13) | 0.28 (0.05) | |||||||||
TPR and FDR are measured as the percentage of related SNPs. Overall accuracy is calculated by pooling all sequences with a given type of CNV. Also reported are the average and standard deviation of the number of seconds required for the analysis of one sequence.
Zhang et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:205 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-205