Table 1

Evaluation of the MSD method on the viral infection and drug response datasets using all genes
Dataset Number of genes Accuracy Relative accuracy Coverage Earliness F1
H3N2 23 77.78 85.71 100 62.50 0.5060
HRV 26 70.00 71.43 100 40.00 0.6462
Baranzini3A 3 70.00 73.91 95.83 46.26 0.6080
Baranzini3B 3 66.67 68.00 100 44.81 0.6039
Baranzini6 6 70.83 70.83 100 42.86 0.6325
Baranzini12 12 66.67 66.67 100 42.86 0.6154
Lin9 9 67.86 69.57 100 44.00 0.6136
Costa17 17 68.00 69.23 100 45.24 0.6067

The performance of the MSD method on 8 datasets is shown in the table. The MSD method achieved good accuracy on most of the datasets using a small fraction of the time series. The distribution of the statistics were skewed and not symmetric, so we report the median of the statistic.

Ghalwash and Obradovic

Ghalwash and Obradovic BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:195   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-195

Open Data