Table 1

Summary from SWISSMODEL evaluation package pseudo-energies
E47/NeuroD1 TWI_A/TWI_B wt TWI_A/TWI_B R118C TWI_A/TWI_B S144R TWI_A/TWI_B K145E E47/TWI wt E47/TWI R118C E47/TWI S144R E47/TWI K145E
ENERGY ANALYSIS DFIRE -138.26 -143.02 -144.22 -144.23 -147.04 -146.4 -143.02 -146.87 -148.82
QMEAN6 0.668 0.762 0.757 0.806 0.804 0.854 0.835 0.840 0.855
Z-score -0.98 0.02 -0.03 0.47 0.45 -0.93 0.73 0.79 0.94
RAMACHANDRAN PLOT Most favored 95.2% 96.2% 97.1% 96.2% 97.1% 97.2% 95.3% 96.3% 96.3%
Allowed 1.9% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 2.9% 1.9% 3.7% 2.8% 2.8%
Generously allowed 1.9% 1.0% 0% 1.0% 0% 0% 0% 0.9% 0.9%
Disallowed 1.0% (K574/C) 0% 0% 0% 0% 0.9% (K32/A) 0.9% (K32/A) 0% 0%

The bad scores are in bold, and the template scores are in bolditalic column. For the Ramachandran plot, the percentages were related to the amount of residues in each area of the plot. TWI – TWIST1 monomer; wt – wild-type.

Maia et al.

Maia et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:184   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-184

Open Data