Table 3

Comparison of error rates and speed
base-calling parameter estimation
Method error rate time (min) time (min)
Bustard 0.0152 2 (total)
Rolexa 0.0170 35 (total)
naiveBayesCall 0.0132 21 1139
BayesCall 0.0124 231 1139
ParticleCall
(via MCEM) 0.0124 88 1139
ParticleCall
(via PFEM) 0.0125 91 39

The base-calling error rate and the running times of different algorithms. ParticleCall is run using parameters obtained via the MCEM parameter estimation scheme as well as via the PFEM parameter estimation algorithm proposed in this paper. For Bustard and Rolexa, only the total running times are reported.

Shen and Vikalo

Shen and Vikalo BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:160   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-160

Open Data