Table 1

Comparison of different annotation methods in terms of AUC
Stage range Number of terms SVMSpatial+Sparse SVMSparse SVMSpatial SVMGlobal
4-6 10 .8284 ± .0321 .8250 ± .0319 .8064 ± .0321 .7984 ± .0320
20 .8310 ± .0286 .8240 ± .0293 .8046 ± .0292 .7965 ± .0302
30 .7982 ± .0408 .7892 ± .0399 .7777 ± .0400 .7635 ± .0405
7-8 10 .7808 ± .0285 .7685 ± .0297 .7567 ± .0301 .7472 ± .0293
20 .7734 ± .0431 .7619 ± .0427 .7444 ± .0496 .7309 ± .0484
9-10 10 .7917 ± .0260 .7816 ± .0270 .7652 ± .0264 .7538 ± .0265
20 .7971 ± .0335 .7829 ± .0344 .7706 ± .0344 .7476 ± .0349
11-12 10 .8526 ± .0248 .8478 ± .0249 .8316 ± .0243 .8257 ± .0240
20 .8574 ± .0206 .8437 ± .0214 .8275 ± .0215 .8091 ± .0228
30 .8275 ± .0252 .8085 ± .0254 .7940 ± .0274 .7673 ± .0268
40 .8193 ± .0290 .7991 ± .0306 .7810 ± .0304 .7560 ± .0321
50 .8084 ± .0351 .7894 ± .0363 .7648 ± .0370 .7426 ± .0382
13-16 10 .8807 ± .0221 .8659 ± .0223 .8632 ± .0218 .8398 ± .0225
20 .8504 ± .0172 .8301 ± .0182 .8304 ± .0180 .8001 ± .0177
30 .8344 ± .0197 .8089 ± .0198 .8066 ± .0190 .7713 ± .0198
40 .8175 ± .0196 .7892 ± .0208 .7847 ± .0211 .7496 ± .0223
50 .8038 ± .0249 .7748 ± .0208 .7672 ± .0261 .7340 ± .0271
60 .7947 ± .0282 .7657 ± .0299 .7613 ± .0300 .7281 ± .0310

Yuan et al.

Yuan et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2012 13:107   doi:10.1186/1471-2105-13-107

Open Data