Table 10 |
||||||
|
ACT feature knock-out experiments for LR |
||||||
|
Features |
F1 score |
Specificity |
Sensitivity |
Accuracy |
Matthews Coef |
AUC iP/R |
|
|
||||||
|
B |
72.33 |
91.61 |
68.28 |
84.84 |
62.14 |
78.97 |
|
N |
50.05 |
94.10 |
38.20 |
77.88 |
40.75 |
60.12 |
|
C |
69.38 |
89.39 |
66.91 |
82.87 |
57.58 |
76.30 |
|
M |
69.61 |
90.83 |
65.37 |
83.44 |
58.53 |
75.06 |
|
|
||||||
|
BC |
74.57 |
92.69 |
70.09 |
86.13 |
65.34 |
80.75 |
|
BCM |
76.45 |
93.20 |
72.17 |
87.10 |
67.84 |
82.67 |
|
BNCM |
76.78 |
93.49 |
72.23 |
87.33 |
68.37 |
82.89 |
|
|
||||||
|
Results of feature knock-out experiments on the combined ACT training and development datasets for the logistic regression (LR) model (%). B – bag of words; N – named entities; C – contextual words surrounding proteins; M – MeSH descriptors. |
||||||
|
Wang et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12(Suppl 8):S11 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-S8-S11 |
||||||