Table 3 |
|||
|
Comparison of available features between existing ontology repositories and OntoCAT |
|||
|
OLS |
BioPortal |
OntoCAT |
|
|
|
|||
|
Web services |
SOAP |
REST |
REST |
|
Java API |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
Complexity (C) |
16 |
29 |
16 |
|
Richness (R) |
177 |
1405 |
≥ 1582 |
|
log R/C |
1.0 |
1.7 |
≥ 2.0 |
|
OWL support |
Yes |
Yes |
|
|
OBO support |
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
|
Local ontologies |
Yes |
||
|
Open source |
Apache License |
Apache License |
LGPL v.3 |
|
|
|||
|
Complexity is represented as a number of public methods available in the respective Java API interface or different web services signatures where the former is not available. Richness is measured as a number of hits returned from a non exact query for 'thymus'. A logarithm of richness and complexity quotient is provided as a single score to judge the relation between the two. It is higher the richer the source and less complex it is to access [created on 27-07-2010]. |
|||
|
Adamusiak et al. BMC Bioinformatics 2011 12:218 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-218 |
|||