Table 1 |
|||
|
Specific MEA methods tested in this study. |
|||
|
Method Name |
Motif Affinity Function (Xg) |
Biological Signal (Yg) |
Partition Maximization Variants |
|
|
|||
|
Fisher |
MC: {0, 1} |
1/p |
YFP, YCPM, YUPM |
|
mHG |
MC: {0, 1, 2} |
1/p |
YFP, YCPM, YUPM |
|
Ranksum |
AMA |
1/p |
YFP, YCPM, YUPM |
|
Clover |
AMA |
1/p |
YFP, YCPM, YUPM |
|
PASTAA |
AMA-like |
1/p |
X, YCPM |
|
Spearman |
AMA |
1/p |
none |
|
LR |
RMA |
-log(p) |
none |
|
|
|||
|
The method names refer to the association function they use: "Fisher" (Fisher Exact Test), "mHG" (multi-hypergeometric test), "Ranksum" (Ranksum or Mann-Whitney U Test), "Clover", "Spearman" (Spearman's rank correlation coefficient) and "LR" (linear regression). For Fisher, the MC motif affinity function is capped at 1 match; for mHG, the MC function is capped at 2 matches. We set tm = 0.0002 for the MC motif affinity function (i.e., matches have PWM score with p-value less than 0.0002). In all methods except LR, Yg is defined as 1/p, where p is the p-value of a microarray probe fluorescence signal; for the LR method, Yg is defined as p. |
|||
|
McLeay and Bailey BMC Bioinformatics 2010 11:165 doi:10.1186/1471-2105-11-165 |
|||