Email updates

Keep up to date with the latest news and content from BMC Bioinformatics and BioMed Central.

Open Access Highly Accessed Software

MarVis: a tool for clustering and visualization of metabolic biomarkers

Alexander Kaever1, Thomas Lingner1, Kirstin Feussner2, Cornelia Göbel3, Ivo Feussner3 and Peter Meinicke1*

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Bioinformatics, Institute of Microbiology and Genetics, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

2 Department of Developmental Biochemistry, Institute for Biochemistry and Molecular Cell Biology, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

3 Department for Plant Biochemistry, Albrecht-von-Haller-Institute for Plant Sciences, Georg-August-University Göttingen, Göttingen, Germany

For all author emails, please log on.

BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:92  doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-92

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/10/92


Received:11 November 2008
Accepted:20 March 2009
Published:20 March 2009

© 2009 Kaever et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

Background

A central goal of experimental studies in systems biology is to identify meaningful markers that are hidden within a diffuse background of data originating from large-scale analytical intensity measurements as obtained from metabolomic experiments. Intensity-based clustering is an unsupervised approach to the identification of metabolic markers based on the grouping of similar intensity profiles. A major problem of this basic approach is that in general there is no prior information about an adequate number of biologically relevant clusters.

Results

We present the tool MarVis (Marker Visualization) for data mining on intensity-based profiles using one-dimensional self-organizing maps (1D-SOMs). MarVis can import and export customizable CSV (Comma Separated Values) files and provides aggregation and normalization routines for preprocessing of intensity profiles that contain repeated measurements for a number of different experimental conditions. Robust clustering is then achieved by training of an 1D-SOM model, which introduces a similarity-based ordering of the intensity profiles. The ordering allows a convenient visualization of the intensity variations within the data and facilitates an interactive aggregation of clusters into larger blocks. The intensity-based visualization is combined with the presentation of additional data attributes, which can further support the analysis of experimental data.

Conclusion

MarVis is a user-friendly and interactive tool for exploration of complex pattern variation in a large set of experimental intensity profiles. The application of 1D-SOMs gives a convenient overview on relevant profiles and groups of profiles. The specialized visualization effectively supports researchers in analyzing a large number of putative clusters, even though the true number of biologically meaningful groups is unknown. Although MarVis has been developed for the analysis of metabolomic data, the tool may be applied to gene expression data as well.

Background

Metabolomic profiling in general aims to identify or confirm biomarkers that are represented by specific metabolite intensity profiles in the context of different physiological and/or experimental conditions. These conditions may represent different phenotypes of a species, disease or environmental and genetic perturbations, or a time course comparing different developmental or physiological stages of an organism [1-4]. High-throughput analytical measurements, as obtained from mass spectrometry experiments [5,6], provide a large number of intensity profiles for accumulation of different metabolites. These data sets show an even higher complexity when repeated measurements for each condition have been performed. For an interpretation based on the experimental conditions these replicas need to be aggregated using e.g. the corresponding mean or median value. For comparative analysis of relative metabolite concentrations it is usually necessary to normalize the resulting intensity vectors, e.g according to a unit Euclidean or "city block" norm. In the following, the aggregated and normalized multivariate intensity profiles are referred to as marker candidates.

Clustering is a well-established technique in the context of gene expression analysis and coexpression studies [7,8]. Intensity-based clustering by analogy aims to group similar intensity profiles in order to identify interesting groups of marker candidates and visualize them in a convenient way. A major problem with the application of clustering algorithms is that an adequate number of clusters can often not be inferred automatically. A purely data-driven approach always bears the risk of over- or under-clustering because the correct number of clusters usually depends on task-specific constraints [9]. One-dimensional self-organizing maps [10] (1D-SOMs) realize a linear array of prototypes that correspond to local averages of the data, ordered according to their similarity. In metabolomic analysis the visualization of ordered prototypes provides a quick overview on relevant intensity patterns in the data and allows to easily merge neighboring groups of marker candidates into meaningful clusters. For example, in [11] we detected a significant number of clusters representing different physiological stages during a plant wounding time course as described in [12,13].

The 1D-SOM realizes a robust and reproducible ordering in particular with regard to changing data quality [11]. Unlike the classical two-dimensional self-organizing maps (2D-SOMs) [10], which are utilized in a number of software tools for gene expression analysis [14,15] and metabolomics [16,17], 1D-SOMs allow a simultaneous visualization of the clustering and the underlying intensity profiles by means of the topologically ordered prototype array. This visualization corresponds to a two-dimensional color-coded matrix, where the first dimension represents the prototype order and the second dimension represents the experimental conditions. While 2D-SOMs can be used to visualize the two-dimensional variation in a single condition, 1D-SOMs provide a complete view on the one-dimensional variation in all conditions simultaneously. Therefore, 1D-SOMs provide a convenient overview of highly complex metabolomic data sets. Beside a number of general software packages, like the well-known SOM toolbox [18] or the "Clustering for Business Analytics" and SOM packages for the R-project [19], several more specific tools [20-22] provide functions to order and visualize multivariate intensity profiles along a one-dimensional array. Though, none of them provides a specialized interface for convenient 1D-SOM visualization and analysis of metabolomics data.

In the following, we introduce the MarVis (Marker Visualization) tool, which implements the concept of 1D-SOM clustering and visualization. Based on an example workflow, the functionality and utility of MarVis is demonstrated.

Implementation

MarVis was written in the Matlab® programming language and has been compiled for Microsoft® Windows XP/Vista and Linux x86. Execution of the software requires installation of the Matlab® Compiler Runtime, which is provided with MarVis. The installation packages and the documentation can be downloaded from the project home page http://marvis.gobics.de webcite.

For data import and export MarVis uses the CSV (Comma Separated Values) file format, which can easily be processed by statistical analysis software and spreadsheet applications. Besides data set meta information and customizable headers, a CSV file for use with MarVis consists of marker candidate-specific lines. Each line contains data fields with intensity measurements for all conditions and replicas (for details see MarVis documentation). By default, MarVis performs an aggregation of repeated measurements for each condition using the corresponding mean or median value. The resulting intensity vectors are normalized before clustering using the Euclidean or "city block" norm or a z-score transformation. If alternatively normalized intensity profiles should be used for clustering, these user-normalized profiles can be stored as additional data in the CSV file. It is also possible to store additional marker candidate properties, which are displayed by MarVis as text. For high-contrast visualization of prototype and marker candidate profiles MarVis uses customizable colormaps, which map original and normalized intensity values to a broad color spectrum. The colormapping for original and normalized intensities is calculated independently according to the respective minimum and maximum intensity values.

Results

In the following, the functionality of MarVis is demonstrated on the basis of a metabolomic case study of a plant wounding experiment analyzed by ultra performance liquid chromatography coupled with an orthogonal time-of-flight mass spectrometer as described before in [11]. The data set contains 837 marker (metabolite) candidates for the wound response of the thale cress Arabidopsis thaliana under 8 conditions. The first four conditions reflect the metabolic situation within a wounding time course of wild type (wt) plants starting with the control plants followed by the plants harvested 0.5, 2 and 5 hours post wounding. The conditions 5 to 8 represent the same time course for the jasmonate deficient mutant plant dde 2-2 [23]. Each condition contains 9 replica samples. The corresponding data set is supplied with the MarVis tool as a CSV file (example data set 1).

File import

The data set is imported using the Open for clustering entry in the File menu. After choosing the input file (examples/dataset1.csv), MarVis displays the Import dialog, where the delimiter character (comma), the start row (5) and column of the header (3), the number of conditions (8), and the number of samples for each condition (9) are specified. In this example, we use the mean intensity value for aggregation of replicas and the Euclidean norm for normalization of intensity profiles (checkbox Import normalized markers deactivated, radio buttons mean and 2-norm selected).

Clustering

After confirmation of the import options, the Clustering dialog is opened. Here, a title (dataset1.csv) and the number of prototypes (e.g. 50) have to be specified. MarVis starts the iterative clustering process and displays the intermediate prototype intensity profiles for each clustering state and the number of currently associated marker candidates in a separate window. The clustering process for the example data set only takes a few seconds on a standard PC. After the clustering process has been finished, the clustering state can be selected according to the desired degree of prototype smoothing (see [11]) by adjusting a scrollbar (see figure 1). Here, we choose the final clustering state corresponding to a minimal amount of smoothing, which is suitable for analysis in most cases.

thumbnailFigure 1. Clustering progress window (final state). The clustering progress window after completion of the clustering process. The scrollbar in the middle of the window may be used to browse through intermediate clustering results with a higher smoothing over the prototype profiles. In the upper plot, MarVis displays the prototypes of the selected clustering state according to the current colormap. By default, MarVis uses the Jet colormap, i.e. red colors represent high intensities and blue colors represent low intensities. The vertical axis represents the different data set conditions, the horizontal axis corresponds to the prototype numbers. In the lower plot, the number of marker candidates that are associated with each prototype are represented as vertical bars with different height.

Visualization and analysis

After selection of an appropriate clustering state for analysis, MarVis returns to the main window and displays the prototype profiles and the number of associated marker candidates in the upper right region. After mouse click on a column corresponding to a particular prototype, further information regarding this prototype is displayed in the other regions of the main window (see figure 2).

thumbnailFigure 2. MarVis main window. The main window of MarVis after selecting a cluster/prototype for further analysis. The window is divided into several regions, which display different information: The prototype plot (compare with figure 1) shows the array of prototypes according to the current colormap (region 1a) and the number of marker candidates in the associated clusters (region 1b). The cluster plot (2) displays the intensity profiles of marker candidates in the currently activated cluster where a white rectangle marks the currently activated candidate and the associated prototype. The marker information box (3) shows detailed information of all candidates in the currently activated cluster. The marker scatter plot (4) displays the retention time vs. the mass-to-charge-ratio of each marker candidate in the currently activated cluster using big red dots. The currently activated candidate is represented by a big blue dot. In the background all marker candidates of the current data set are plotted as small gray dots. The active-prototype/marker plot (5) displays the magnified prototype profile of the activated cluster according to the current colormap.

The prototype plot shows the array of prototypes according to the current colormap (region 1a) and additional information on the associated marker candidates (region 1b). The vertical axis of region 1a represents the number of data set conditions, while the horizontal axis corresponds to the prototype numbers. A cursor (represented by a white rectangle) marks the current prototype under investigation. By default, the displayed prototype profiles are equally spaced and region 1b shows the associated cluster sizes as a bar diagram. Clicking on the toggle view button changes between different graphical representation modes. Besides the default view, the prototype profiles can be spaced according to the size of their associated clusters, which helps to identify dominating intensity profiles (see figure 3). In this case, region 1b contains the original or normalized intensity profiles of the marker candidates associated with each prototype. The title above region 1a indicates, which graphical representation mode is currently activated. By clicking on one of the columns corresponding to a prototype (or using the left and right cursor keys) the associated cluster can be activated.

thumbnailFigure 3. Prototype plot. Two alternative display modes of the prototype plot (region 1a and 1b in figure 2): The first mode (top) corresponds to equally spaced prototype profiles with a cluster size bar plot in the lower part. The second mode (bottom) shows the prototypes spaced according to cluster size (upper box) and the normalized intensity profiles of the respective marker candidates (lower box).

For the data set of the wounding case study the prototype plot (figure 2, region 1a) reveals

• a block of marker candidates that show high intensities in the conditions representing wt plants only (prototype 1 to 18, condition 1 to 4)

• an intermediate block of different profiles representing high intensities across wt and dde 2-2 mutant plants (prototype 19 to 24)

• a block of prototypes that show high intensities in the jasmonate deficient mutant plants only (prototype 27 to 36, condition 5 to 8)

• and a block of candidates that particularly represent high concentrations in the third and eighth condition (prototype 40 to 50).

The first block corresponds to clusters in [11] that contain wound induced markers exclusively associated with wild type plants as described in [12,13]. In addition, clusters related to the third block contained markers that seem to be dependent on the jasmonate deficiency.

The corresponding bar diagram (figure 2, region 1b) shows that a number of clusters contain just a few or no marker candidates at all (e.g. cluster 30). These "sparse" clusters result from the restriction of the prototypes on a 1D-topology and usually indicate the use of too many prototypes.

The cluster plot (see figure 2, region 2) shows the intensity profiles of marker candidates in the activated cluster. Each column represents the intensity profile of a single marker candidate displayed according to the current colormap. A cursor (white rectangle) indicates the currently activated candidate. By clicking the toggle view button, MarVis switches between normalized and original intensities. By default normalized intensities are shown. The example data set shows large differences regarding the original intensity values. This results in a colormapping, where low original intensities cannot be visually distinguished. When the Logarithmic intensities checkbox in the View menu is activated, the colormapping for original intensity profiles is calculated logarithmically. This improves the visibility of small intensity differences significantly (see figure 4). The logarithmic transformation is only used for the visualization of original intensity profiles and does not affect the clustering results.

thumbnailFigure 4. Cluster plot. The cluster plot (region 2 in figure 2) with standard (left side) and logarithmical colormapping (right side) of the original intensity values (72 values for each marker candidate according to 8 different conditions and 9 replicas for each condition).

The marker information box (see figure 2, region 3) shows a table of available information on all marker candidates in the currently activated cluster. Each candidate is represented by one row. Apart from marker candidate ID (second column), retention time (rt, third column) and mass-to-charge-ratio (m/z, fourth column), also the values for additional data attributes (see section "Implementation") are displayed. In this example, the column KWpValue represents p-values obtained from a Kruskal-Wallis test [24]. These values have been used as a quality measure for selection of marker candidates in [11]. By pressing the up and down cursor keys or selecting a particular row via mouse click, the specific candidate can be highlighted. Within the marker information box, the candidates are sorted by retention time. MarVis keeps this order of the input file when displaying the candidates of single clusters.

The marker scatter plot (see figure 2, region 4) displays the rt vs. m/z values of each marker candidate in the currently activated cluster using big red dots. The currently activated candidate is represented by a big blue dot. In the background all marker candidates of the data set are plotted as small gray dots. By clicking into the plot a particular candidate can be activated. Using the scatter plot, putative isotopomers or adducts of compounds can easily be identified by vertical stacks of candidates that do not differ in retention time (see figure 2, region 4).

The active-prototype/marker plot (see figure 2, region 5) by default displays the magnified prototype of the activated cluster according to the current colormap.

Additional functionality

MarVis stores a list of selected marker candidates in memory. Single candidates or entire clusters can easily be added to or removed from this list. The selected marker candidates can be exported as a CSV file for further analysis, e.g. for identification of related metabolic pathways based on mass values of candidates [25]. The candidates may also be re-clustered using a lower number of prototypes in order to avoid sparse clusters. In addition to the export of selected marker candidates, MarVis can save the entire clustering result as a CSV file. This includes the marker data with additional values for normalized marker candidates (sorted by cluster order), cluster number, and intensity profiles of the associated prototypes. The current settings, which include the data set and all user-specific parameters (e.g. current colormap, visualization properties, dialog entries), can be saved and restored. For details on the above-mentioned functions see the MarVis documentation.

Conclusion

MarVis provides a graphical user interface for exploratory data analysis, well-suited for the visualization of metabolomic intensity profiles. The realization of 1D-SOMs gives a convenient overview of multivariate data sets. In particular, the specialized visualization effectively supports researchers to cope with the problem of an unknown number of biologically meaningful groups of intensity profiles. In that way, interesting groups can easily be identified based on their intensity patterns and their position in the prototype array. Additional data attributes that support the analysis and interpretation of marker candidates can be integrated in MarVis using customized data fields in the CSV input file. By using the CSV export functions, the clustering results can be imported and processed by other statistical analysis software. The customizable CSV file format also allows to import, cluster and analyze experimental data from other than metabolomic studies, e.g. from gene expression experiments. An example application on gene expression data is shown in the MarVis documentation.

Availability and requirements

Project name: MarVis

Project home page: http://marvis.gobics.de webcite

Operating system(s): Microsoft® Windows XP/Vista and Linux x86

Programming language: Matlab®

Other requirements: Matlab® Compiler Runtime 7.8 (provided with MarVis)

License: Free for academic use

Authors' contributions

AK implemented the MarVis graphical user interface and drafted parts of the manuscript. TL contributed conceptually and drafted parts of the manuscript. KF, CG and IF provided the metabolomic case study data set, tested the software, contributed conceptually and drafted parts of the manuscript. PM implemented the clustering algorithm and drafted parts of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work was partially supported by Federal Ministry of Research and Education (BMBF) project "MediGRID" (BMBF 01AK803G) and by German Research Council project "Signals in the Verticillium-plant interaction" (DFG FOR-546). We are grateful to Dr. Ingo Heilmann for discussions and critical reading of the manuscript.

References

  1. Fiehn O, Kopka J, Dörmann P, Altmann T, Trethewey R, Willmitzer L: Metabolite profiling for plant functional genomics.

    Nature Biotechnology 2000, 18:1157-1161. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Shulaev V, Cortes D, Miller G, Mittler R: Metabolomics for plant stress response.

    Physiologia Plantarum 2008, 132(2):199-208. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Tarpley L, Duran A, Kebrom T, Sumner L: Biomarker metabolites capturing the metabolite variance present in a rice plant developmental period.

    BMC Plant Biol 2005, 5:8. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  4. Malitsky S, Blum E, Less H, Venger I, Elbaz M, Morin S, Eshed Y, Aharoni A: The transcript and metabolite networks affected by the two clades of Arabidopsis glucosinolate biosynthesis regulators.

    Plant Physiol 2008, 148:2021-2049. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Dettmer K, Aronov PA, Hammock BD: Mass spectrometry-based metabolomics.

    Mass Spectrom Rev 2007, 26:51-78. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  6. Grata E, Boccard J, Guillarme D, Glauser G, Carrupt P, Farmer E, Wolfender J, Rudaz S: UPLC-TOF-MS for plant metabolomics: a sequential approach for wound marker analysis in Arabidopsis thaliana.

    J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci 2008, 871:261-270. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  7. Jiang D, Tang C, Zhang A: Cluster Analysis for Gene Expression Data: A Survey.

    IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 2004, 16(11):1370-1386. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  8. D'haeseleer P: How does gene expression clustering work?

    Nature Biotechnology 2005, 23:1499-1501. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Jain AK, Dubes RC: Algorithms for clustering data. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc; 1988.

  10. Kohonen T: Self-Organizing Maps. Secaucus, NJ, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc; 1995.

  11. Meinicke P, Lingner T, Kaever A, Feussner K, Göbel C, Feussner I, Karlovsky P, Morgenstern B: Metabolite-based clustering and visualization of mass spectrometry data using one-dimensional self-organizing maps.

    Algorithms for Molecular Biology: AMB 2008, 3:9. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  12. Glauser G, Grata E, Dubugnon L, Rudaz S, Farmer E, Wolfender J: Spatial and temporal dynamics of Jasmonate synthesis and accumulation in Arabidopsis in response to wounding.

    J Biol Chem 2008, 3283:16400-7. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Miersch O, Neumerkel J, Dippe M, Stenzel I, Wasternack C: Hydroxylated jasmonates are commonly occurring metabolites of jasmonic acid and contribute to a partial switch-off in jasmonate signaling.

    New Phytol 2008, 177:114-127. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  14. Tamayo P, Slonim D, Mesirov J, Zhu Q, Kitareewan S, Dmitrovsky E, Lander E, Golub T: Interpreting patterns of gene expression with self-organizing maps: Methods and application to hematopoietic differentiation.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1999, 96(6):2907-2912. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  15. Eichler G, Huang S, Ingber D: Gene Expression Dynamics Inspector (GEDI): for integrative analysis of expression profiles.

    Bioinformatics 2003, 19(17):2321-2322. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  16. Kouskoumvekaki I, Yang Z, Jónsdóttir S, Olsson L, Panagiotou G: Identification of biomarkers for genotyping Aspergilli using non-linear methods for clustering and classification.

    BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:59. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  17. Sato S, Arita M, Soga T, Nishioka T, Tomita M: Time-resolved metabolomics reveals metabolic modulation in rice foliage.

    BMC Systems Biology 2008, 2:51. PubMed Abstract | BioMed Central Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL

  18. Vesanto J, Alhoniemi E, Himberg J, Kiviluoto K, Parviainen J: Self-Organizing Map for Data Mining in Matlab: The SOM Toolbox.

    Simulation News Europe 1999., 25(54) OpenURL

  19. Gentleman R, Ihaka R, et al.: The R Project for Statistical Computing. [http://www.r-project.org/] webcite

  20. Eisen M, Spellman P, Brown P, Botstein D: Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns.

    Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 1998, 95(25):14863-14868. Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  21. de Hoon M, Imoto S, Nolan J, Miyano S: Open source clustering software.

    Bioinformatics 2004, 20(9):1453-1454. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  22. Saldanha A: Java Treeview-extensible visualization of microarray data.

    Bioinformatics 2004, 20(17):3246-3248. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  23. von Malek B, Graaff E, Schneitz K, Keller B: The Arabidopsis male-sterile mutant dde2-2 is defective in the ALLENE OXIDE SYNTHASE gene encoding one of the key enzymes of the jasmonic acid biosynthesis pathway.

    Planta 2002, 216:187-192. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  24. Gibbons J, Chakraborti S: Nonparametric Statistical Inference. CRC Press; 2003. OpenURL

  25. Suhre K, Schmitt-Kopplin P: MassTRIX: mass translator into pathways.

    Nucleic Acids Res 2008, 36:W481-484. PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text | PubMed Central Full Text OpenURL