|
BMC Bioinformatics Volume 10
|
Viewing options:Associated material:Related literature:- Articles citing this article
- Other articles by authors
- Related articles/pages
Tools: Post to:
|
 Methodology articlePhylogenetic analysis of modularity in protein interaction networksSinan Erten* 1 , Xin Li* 1 , Gurkan Bebek2,3,4,5 , Jing Li1,2,3,4 and Mehmet Koyutürk1,2  1Department of Electrical Engineering & Computer Science, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA 2Case Center for Proteomics & Bioinformatics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA 3Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA 4Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, USA 5Genomic Medicine Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, USA author email corresponding author email* Contributed equally
BMC Bioinformatics 2009,
10:333doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-333
|
|
| Published: |
14 October 2009 |
Abstract
Background
In systems biology, comparative analyses of molecular interactions across diverse species indicate that conservation and divergence of networks can be used to understand functional evolution from a systems perspective. A key characteristic of these networks is their modularity, which contributes significantly to their robustness, as well as adaptability. Consequently, analysis of modular network structures from a phylogenetic perspective may be useful in understanding the emergence, conservation, and diversification of functional modularity.
Results
In this paper, we propose a phylogenetic framework for analyzing network modules, with applications that extend well beyond network-based phylogeny reconstruction. Our approach is based on identification of modular network components from each network separately, followed by projection of these modules onto the networks of other species to compare different networks. Subsequently, we use the conservation of various modules in each network to assess the similarity between different networks. Compared to traditional methods that rely on topological comparisons, our approach has key advantages in (i) avoiding intractable graph comparison problems in comparative network analysis, (ii) accounting for noise and missing data through flexible treatment of network conservation, and (iii) providing insights on the evolution of biological systems through investigation of the evolutionary trajectories of network modules. We test our method, MOPHY, on synthetic data generated by simulation of network evolution, as well as existing protein-protein interaction data for seven diverse species. Comprehensive experimental results show that MOPHY is promising in reconstructing evolutionary histories of extant networks based on conservation of modularity, it is highly robust to noise, and outperforms existing methods that quantify network similarity in terms of conservation of network topology.
Conclusion
These results establish modularity and network proximity as useful features in comparative network analysis and motivate detailed studies of the evolutionary histories of network modules. |