Skip to main content
Download PDF

Views of Hong Kong Chinese medicine practitioners on the application of the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans” prepared by the Chinese medicine expert group of central authorities: a focus group study

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies volume 24, Article number: 184 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Drawing on the extensive utilization of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) to combat COVID-19 in Mainland China, experts designed a series of TCM anti-epidemic strategies. This study aims to understand Hong Kong CM practitioners’ application of and opinions on the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans.”

Methods

Online focus group interviews were conducted, and purposive sampling was employed to invite 22 CM practitioners to voluntarily participate in three interview sessions. The interviews were audio recorded, then transcribed verbatim. The transcripts were analyzed using template analysis.

Results

Three themes were derived: (1) facilitators of the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,” (2) barriers of the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,” and (3) expectations on improving the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans.” The participants could obtain relevant information from various sources, which highlights the value of the plans for TCM medicinal cuisine and non-pharmacologic therapies and guiding junior CM practitioners, supplementing Western medicine interventions, and managing Chinese herb reserves in clinics. However, the barriers included the lack of a specialized platform for timely information release, defective plan content, limited reference value to experienced CM practitioners, and lack of applicability to Hong Kong. The expectations of the CM practitioners for improving the plans were identified based on the barriers.

Conclusions

To enhance the implementation of the anti-epidemic plans, CM practitioners in Hong Kong expect to utilize a specific CM platform and refine the plans to ensure that they are realistic, focused, comprehensive, and tailored to the local context.

Peer Review reports

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic, caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, led to a global health crisis of unprecedented magnitude [1]. As the virus spread rapidly across borders, infecting millions and posing a threat to healthcare systems worldwide [2, 3], various medical approaches were explored to mitigate its impact [4,5,6]. Traditional Chinese medicine (TCM), with its rich history and holistic approach to healthcare, emerged as a valuable resource for combating diseases [7, 8]. Rooted in centuries of traditional knowledge and practices, TCM encompasses a range of modalities, including the use of Chinese herbs, acupuncture, moxibustion, and auricular therapy [9]. Such therapeutic techniques have been extensively examined and applied in China, suggesting their potential in managing infectious diseases [10]. In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, experts in TCM formulated and adopted specific anti-epidemic strategies based on their experience and the clinical plans implemented in Mainland China, to provide valuable insights and instructive recommendations for the effective utilization of TCM across populations and strata [7]. A comprehensive and integrative approach can be created to address the diverse needs of individuals affected by the pandemic by incorporating TCM into the existing healthcare framework [7].

Drawing on the extensive utilization of TCM in Mainland China to combat diseases, and considering the pre-existing clinical plans employed in Hong Kong, a group of experts formulated a series of TCM anti-epidemic strategies that are intended for practical implementation [11]. Such plans can serve as instructive guidelines for the CM domain and public, which outline the appropriate utilization of CM across strata and target populations. Specifically, the guidelines cater to close contacts, secondary close contacts, asymptomatic individuals, individuals displaying mild symptoms, patients receiving care in isolation facilities, and those in the process of recovery. The “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans” include “Recommendations on the Use of Proprietary Chinese Medicines at Home for COVID-19 (Pilot Version),” the “COVID-19 Chinese Medicine Treatment Plan (Pilot Version),” and “Guidance and Recommendations on Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Recovery Stage (Pilot Version)” [12]. To gain a deep understanding of Hong Kong CM practitioners’ application of and opinions on the guidelines, we designed and conducted focus group interviews. Many proprietary CMs in China are not available in Hong Kong; thus, we focused on the “COVID-19 Chinese Medicine Treatment Plan (Pilot Version)” and “Guidance and Recommendations on Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Recovery Stage (Pilot Version).”

Methods

Ethical approval

was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HSEARS20220428008). The Consolidated Criteria for Reporting Qualitative Research checklist was used to guide the reporting of this study [13].

Aim

This study aimed to explore and collect information on Hong Kong CM practitioners’ application experience in and opinions on the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,” specifically the “COVID-19 Chinese Medicine Treatment Plan (Pilot Version)” and “Guidance and Recommendations on Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Recovery Stage (Pilot Version).”

Design

This study employed a qualitative approach, that is, semi-structured focus group discussions. The research methodology will enable researchers to gain an in-depth understanding of specific topics and allow the active participation of the respondents, who are expected to contribute their expertise and experience.

Setting and sampling

All the respondents, who were registered CM practitioners, participated in the online focus group interviews. The participants were recruited from three local CM practitioner associations (i.e., Sin-Hua Herbalists & Herb Dealers’ Promotion Society, Hong Kong Baptist University School of Chinese Medicine Alumni Association, and the Chinese Medicine Alumni Association of CUHK) from July to September 2022. Purposeful sampling was conducted for the sample selection, and the CM practitioners who were willing to participate in the interviews were invited to join the study [14]. The CM practitioners who were included in the qualitative study (1) were registered TCM practitioners in Hong Kong and (2) had clinical experience in the diagnosis and treatment of at least 30 COVID-19 patients during the fifth wave of the COVID-19 pandemic in Hong Kong. Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants, and each focus group interview was led by the principal researcher (YSH) as the moderator, with a research assistant (MHL) as the assistant moderator. All the focus group interviews were conducted online via Zoom as a social-distancing measure during the COVID-19 pandemic and to prevent the spread of the virus.

Data collection

The focus group interviews were moderated in accordance with a practical guide to focus groups written by Krueger et al. [15]. A semi-structured interview guide was developed and revised on the basis of experts’ comments, including two TCM practitioners (YSH [PhD] and WFY [PhD]) and a qualitative researcher (HLC [PhD]). The guide consisted of four open-ended questions (Table 1). The moderator (YSH) establish a strong rapport with the participants, because some of them were alumni, and others were from the same local TCM associations. The moderator was an experienced Hong Kong CM practitioner with strong research expertise in TCM intervention and trained by an experienced qualitative researcher (HLC). In each interview session, the moderator introduced herself, explained the purpose and process of the meeting, highlighted the rules on confidentiality, explained the questions, constantly provided prompts and pauses to facilitate interaction between the group members without expressing any value judgments, and ensured that the participants were focused on the discussion. The assistant moderator (MHL) took notes throughout the discussion and operated the recording equipment during the interviews. Participation was voluntary. No other individuals besides the participants and researchers were present during the interviews. All the qualitative interviews were audio recorded. For confidentiality, all the participants were asked to turn off all audio and video devices to provide a natural and safe atmosphere. Each participant was offered a HKD 200 cash voucher for their participation.

Table 1 Questions for the semi-structured interview
Full size table

Data analysis

All the interviews were audio recorded, then transcribed verbatim in traditional Chinese before the data analysis. Each participant was renamed by using a code to ensure confidentiality. All the study-related documents and transcripts were deidentified, and all the audio files were destroyed after the completion of the transcription. Descriptive characteristics were used for the demographic data to provide the sample profile. The transcripts were analyzed using template analysis, which is a thematic analysis style that stresses the use of hierarchical coding [16, 17]. Template analysis can be roughly divided into several steps. (a) The transcripts were read to determine the a priori themes and conduct preliminary coding. (b) The initial template was defined. (c) All the data sets were examined systematically to modify the template by inserting, deleting, or merging contents, if necessary. (d) The template for the full data set was finalized. The assistant moderator (MHL) and first author (SCC) transcribed the interviews and coded the data. In addition, the two researchers independently read all the interview transcripts to gain an in-depth understanding of the data, completed the data immersion process, and performed independent coding by writing the words or codes from each interview that seemed to capture important thoughts or concepts. Then, the researchers compared the codes, finalized the initial coding scheme, and sorted the codes into emergent themes that represented the key findings from the interviews. The researchers resolved discrepancies by consulting the principal researcher (YSH). The other authors provided feedback on the data analyses. Coding management was facilitated using MS Word [18, 19].

Trustworthiness

Several strategies were used to determine the trustworthiness of the study findings based on the four criteria created by Lincoln: credibility, dependability, conformability, and transferability [20, 21]. (1) Credibility: The interview proposal was revised during two group meetings. The researchers were equipped with the required knowledge and expertise to perform their responsibilities. To reduce researcher bias, all the research team members provided feedback on the analyses and study findings. (2) Dependability: The findings were presented to the participants for comments and confirmation. The coding structure was validated by another researcher (SCC), then revalidated by the corresponding author (YSH) by reviewing the original transcript. (3) Confirmability: The transcripts were given to the participants for feedback. Therefore, negative case analysis was adopted to enhance the trustworthiness of the qualitative data. (4) Transferability: The researchers determined the richness of the data by applying saturation theory [22] and continued to gather data until new information was nearly exhausted by the time five sessions were reached [23].

Results

The focus group interviews were conducted in Cantonese between July and September 2022. A total of 31 Hong Kong CM practitioners were invited to participate in the study, and 22 accepted the invitation. Five focus group interviews were conducted. The interviews had a mean duration of 60.4 min and ranged from 37 min to 110 min. The number of participants in each group ranged from 3 to 6. Most of the participants in each group were acquainted with one another. Data saturation was applied to guide the data collection [22], with themes and subthemes that were established in the first three focus group interviews and enriched after the fifth focus group interview.

Sample profile

A total of 22 Hong Kong CM practitioners (9 women [41.0%] and 13 men [59.0%]) participated in the five focus group interview sessions. The mean age of the participants was 37.3 years (SD = 4.8). All the CM practitioners had at least a bachelor’s degree, 7 (31.8%) had a doctoral degree, and 12 (54.5%) had a master’s degree. The participants’ demographic information is presented in Table 2.

Table 2 Demographic Characteristics of Participants Interviewed (N = 22)
Full size table

Major themes

In terms of the CM practitioners’ experience with the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,” three themes were identified from the data: (1) facilitators of the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,” (2) barriers of the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,” and (3) expectations on improving the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans.” The specific subthemes under each theme were described, and Table 3 presents the code structure.

Table 3 Code structures
Full size table

Facilitators of “Chinese medicine anti-epidemic plans”

This theme consisted of four subthemes: (a) diversified information channels, (b) reference value of the plans, (c) the value to patients, and (d) the value to TCM practitioners.

Diversified information channels

All the participants mentioned that they had read or heard about the documents, and their ways of obtaining information varied, such as from TCM groups, social media, the workplace, nongovernment organizations, hospital authorities, peer exchanges, and TCM training. A participant (P1) shared that he obtained information on the documents from “some TCM groups or classmate groups shared [the documents] with everyone.” Another participant (P2) mentioned, “I remember I hearing about that on TV news and I had seen it in the association.”

Reference value of the plans

Most of the participants believed that the reference value of the “COVID-19 Chinese Medicine Treatment Plan (Pilot Version)” focused on TCM medicinal cuisine and non-pharmacologic therapies (e.g., acupuncture and acupressure). A participant (P11) said, “Rehabilitation guidelines have their benefits, such as [for a] TCM medicinal cuisine. If patients have any inquiries, then you can answer them by referring to the guidelines.” According to another participant (P5), “Acupuncture and moxibustion interventions are described in detail instead, specific acupuncture points and duration are covered, massage therapy techniques are also included ”.

The value to patients

Most of the CM practitioners affirmed the value of the “Guidance and Recommendations on Chinese Medicine Rehabilitation During COVID-19 Recovery Stage (Pilot Version)” to inpatients and patients with chronic underlying diseases or deficiency syndromes. One of the participants (P16) depicted the target users of CM prescriptions in the guidelines: “They were sent from hospitals to AsiaWorld-Expo Asia World-Expo(a quarantine center operated by the Hong Kong Government). Most are old, with chronic diseases and deficiency syndromes. I think that the prescription is really useful for elderly people. They don’t cough much and their symptoms are related to comorbid chronic diseases. Most cases have recovered from illness after taking traditional Chinese medicine.” One participant (P15) suggested the application of the guidelines in quarantine centers in Hong Kong: “It was used frequently in AsiaWorld-Expo Asia World-Expo.”

The value to TCM practitioners

The participants narrated the value of the two documents to Hong Kong CM practitioners from several aspects, including guiding the functions of new CM practitioners with little clinical experience, complementing Western medicine interventions, and managing Chinese herb reserves and prescription formulation. A participant (P21) agreed with the reference value of the documents to junior CM practitioners but disagreed with their value to experienced CM practitioners: “For fresh graduates TCM practitioners believe it has a reference value, while highly experienced ones think it has none.” A participant (P16) believed that the documents may help doctors use CM interventions to complement Western medicine: “[For some COVID-19 symptoms], Western medicine can’t do much, there were no Covid-19 antivirals at that time…there is really no medicine to treat him. Just take these traditional Chinese medicines.” Another participant (P7) mentioned that the documents could guide CM practitioners’ prescription ideas and reserves of different CMs in hospitals and clinics: “After looking through this material, I may remind myself that such people (patients) exist. I may not have made a prescription for a pure ginseng decoction before. Should I prepare some Codonopsis pilosula (similar effect to ginseng) in the clinic first? Compared to the one released by the National Health Commission, this (Hong Kong) version may provide more insight in these areas.”

Barriers of the “Chinese medicine anti-epidemic plans”

The barriers to the application of the anti-epidemic plans included five subthemes: (a) issues on plan release, (b) defects in the content of the plans, (c) low reference value to TCM practitioners, and (d) unsuitable for local application.

Issues on plan release

Despite all the channels through which the participants could obtain information on the plans, they all believed that the dissemination of the plans was problematic. The main problem was the lack of a specialized platform for CM practitioners in Hong Kong to get official guidance or information on the plans. A participant (P7) expressed this point, as follows: “I know from the news that there would be a plan, but it is difficult to search, no matter which channel you used. We currently do not have an official channel for traditional Chinese medicine.” Another problem was the late release of the documents, which missed the peak of the pandemic. “I feel that if it were released earlier, with this version, I could accept it. Because at that time, when everyone started their clinical work, we had no chance to see these patients. This plan tells us what we will encounter, so it is all right. However, it was released in April, and the peak was over” (P15).

Defects in the content of plans

The participants generally believed that the content of the plans was defective in several respects. First, the intervention methods occasionally crossed the broad line between prevention, treatment, and prognosis, which were confusing. “I don’t know why in the industry there is often confusion between prevention, treatment and post-treatment. Why does one prescription, initially meant for prevention, turned into that for post-treatment? I think this is a big issue” (P17). Second, the feasibility of TCM medicinal cuisine and non-pharmacologic therapies was limited, and preparations for all the materials needed for TCM medicinal cuisine therapy and manipulations of external therapies (e.g., acupuncture and tuina) were complicated. A CM practitioner (P12) complained, “In addition, they (the suggested plans) are very complicated. Siraitia grosvenorii, ficus carica, asian pear, orange, radish, and olives should be all included, which is difficult. Some of them are complicated. I won’t do moxibustion and massage, so I won’t refer to the plan.” Third, the effect of the plans on the sequelae of the pandemic was limited. A participant (P16) pointed out: “Many patients who suffered from COVID-19 have different diseases (symptoms), these Chinese medicine prescriptions are useless, for those with emotional problems, these prescriptions may not help.”

Low reference value to TCM practitioners

Many of the participants doubted the reference value of the plans to experienced CM practitioners, though they may provide some useful information to new CM practitioners. CM practitioners may have accumulated considerable experience by the time the plans were released, and the participants did not completely agree with the prescriptions in the plans. “After the clinical guidelines were released, we had already conducted consultation with a lot of patients, the variant was Omicron, and we had basically mastered the entire pattern. So, the subsequent information didn’t hold much reference value for us.” (P1).

Unsuitable for local application

The participants believed that the plans were not fully suitable for Hong Kong. On the one hand, the plans lacked typical local TCM patterns, such as the dampness–heat pattern. A participant (P12) said, “It does not cover the therapy for the late-stage damp–heat diseases and warm-heat diseases. There is no content related to the warm-heat disease.” On the other hand, outpatients accounted for the vast majority of the individuals who sought CM treatment, which differed from the mainland. Therefore, the feasibility of the plans was considerably compromised. “I understand all the contents in the COVID-19 guidelines, but it is difficult to implement in Hong Kong due to insufficient conditions. Most of the cases we have are outpatient visits (outpatient visits refer to patients who are not isolated in facilities such as the AsiaWorld-Expo or Mobile Cabin Facilities Asia World-Expo)” (P9).

Expectations on improving the “Chinese medicine anti-epidemic plans”

The expectations of the CM practitioners included three subthemes: (a) plan release mechanism improvement, (b) plan content improvement, (c) enrichment of information sources for plan development, and (d) plan localization.

Plan release mechanism improvement

The participants proposed several ideas for improving the mechanism for releasing the plans. Most of the CM practitioners believed that an official institution or sector was needed for the dissemination of CM-related information. One participant (P22) mentioned that Hong Kong could learn from the mainland regarding this aspect: “In mainland China, the National Health Commission and State Administration of Traditional Chinese Medicine are responsible for jointly organizing experts to formulate these diagnosis and treatment plans, which are then publicly released. Therefore, a similar institution should be established in Hong Kong.” Another participant (P18) expected the creation of a local version of the plans, as the pronunciation of some words is different between Mandarin and Cantonese: “For respiratory therapy, shall it be practiced using Mandarin pronunciation? If it is pronounced in Mandarin, then it is different from our Cantonese pronunciation. Thus, do we need to do a Cantonese version?” Pronunciation is essential for respiratory therapy, which involves patients’ self-practice and training of their vocal resonance chamber to improve their breathing. A few of the participants expressed that the plans should be timely and updated continuously to provide forward-looking information. One participant (P15) illustrated the need for quarterly updates: “There should be an organization responsible for updating the information for doctors regularly (e.g., quarterly updates).”

Plan content improvement

All the participants expressed their expectations on the improvement of the content of the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans.” For supplementary diagnosis and treatment, expectations in three areas were expressed, that is, disease symptoms and transmission, the coordination mode of CM and Western medicine, and the refinement of the content of nondrug treatment. A participant (P3) hoped to learn the difference between COVID-19 symptoms and common cold symptoms: “I would like to know how those symptoms differ from the symptoms I usually see or how they differ from the cold symptoms I have seen before.” Another participant (P22) emphasized its significance for screening critical symptoms: “Pathogenesis, disease mechanisms, and identifying high-risk groups, so that doctors know which are critical symptoms and how to handle them accordingly.” One of the participants (P5) believed that CM practitioners should know how to combine the CM plans with Western medicine: “Add more content about Western medicine, including the intervention time of TCM. At that time, I could imagine that the combination of Chinese and Western medicines would be even better. This plan then will have great reference value, such as what kind of dialectics and what medicine to use. ” She (P5) also expressed that additional information should be provided in the section on acupuncture: “For acupuncture, there is no distinction between main acupoints, and there is no selection of acupoints based on syndrome differentiation. I believe that it can be written in more detail, and there are some aspects that I don’t know why they do it in this way?” Besides the above expectations on diagnosis and treatment, most of the participants strongly recommended the provision of targeted and specific treatment plans for different user groups. “Write down how to use Western and traditional Chinese medicine in parallel, and then observe the clinical performance of [the] patients. In this way, there is a clinical reference value. Medication treatment should be more clear, precise, and targeted; We cannot always generalize” (P9). Another participant (P22) said, “If a plan is issued, it may need to be divided into different directions. One is targeting the community, which can be accessed earlier. The other one is for various centers (isolation facilities).” Some of the CM practitioners hoped for experts to supplement the documents with references. According to one participant (P8), “The clinical protocol should have references. If there are references, everyone can look them up for further review. Maybe this could be much better?” Case reports during a COVID-19 outbreak were also expected to be summarized and added to the documents for experience sharing among CM practitioners. A participant (P2) expressed, “I think sharing actual cases, has more practical utility, and without pulse taking and tongue inspection, how do they prescribe medication and diagnose? I think these experiences are useful, but it may be challenging to incorporate them into the guidelines.”

Enrichment of information sources for plan development

The participants expected the information sources of the documents to be enriched in three aspects. First, local institutions should rapidly collect information on treatment experiences and epidemic characteristics to summarize the disease patterns. “Because nobody knows the characteristics and pattern of the disease in the human body, everyone is exploring. If you have the information, write it down” (P1). Second, a communication platform should be set up in Hong Kong for CM practitioners to pool their ideas. “Experience can be presented on a platform. Those who have less experience can gradually learn from more experienced TCM practitioners. This way, when others are working, there will be new experiences. This will not only help quickly establish a systematic framework, but it also adds reference value” (P5). Third, the plans should originate from clinical treatment experiences and refer to the diagnosis and treatment ideas of experts from different folk schools. “Different schools of thought, for example, those who use classical prescriptions, may have a different perspective from other TCM practitioners. There will be more diverse reference ideas and elements. I think this is better when compared to the current textbook-style or syndrome-based approach” (P4).

Plan localization

Most of the participants challenged the localization of the plans and presented two ways to localize the plans. On the one hand, the plans should be formulated in accordance with the locality, time, and persons involved. One participant (P17) explained this point: “I believe that for the same viral pathogen, there should be variations based on different seasons and weather conditions.” On the other hand, local CM practitioner groups in Hong Kong should be involved in the development of the plans. One participant (P15) emphasized its importance: “You need frontline TCM experts from our region. You definitely won’t have enough knowledgeable understanding of our situation compared to local TCM practitioners who have been practicing here for over a decade.”

Discussion

This focus group interview study is the first to comprehensively explore the perspectives of Hong Kong CM practitioners on the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans.” Focus group interviews can enable the thorough exploration of research topics by capturing the diverse perspectives of the participants, resulting in detailed and comprehensive data for a nuanced understanding of their ideas and experiences [24]. The group format can foster dynamic discussions, stimulating idea generation, novel insights, and the expression of perspectives that may be missed in individual interviews. Such interactions can enhance our understanding of complex social phenomena [2]. The qualitative data demonstrate the Hong Kong CM practitioners’ views on the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans,” with three themes: facilitators, barriers, and expectations. The participants can obtain relevant information from various sources, highlighting the value of the plans for TCM medicinal cuisine and non-pharmacologic therapies as well as for guiding junior CM practitioners, supplementing Western medicine interventions, and managing Chinese herb reserves in clinics. However, the barriers include the lack of a specialized platform for timely information release, defective plan content, limited reference value to experienced CM practitioners, and lack of local applicability to Hong Kong. The CM practitioners’ expectations on the improvement of the plans are based on the identified barriers.

The findings of this study reflect the characteristics of TCM diagnosis and treatment as well as the situation of the plan application in Hong Kong, which are in line with the findings of previous studies. Many clinical trials have suggested the beneficial effects of TCM interventions on chronic diseases or conditions, such as knee osteoarthritis [25], frozen shoulder [26], diabetes [27], asthma [28], and insomnia [29], especially in older adults. Several studies also examined and supported the effects and feasibility of self-administered TCM interventions, such as self-acupressure [30], self-moxibustion [31], parent-administered tui na [32], qigong [33], and TTCM medicinal cuisines [34]. A review on TCM medicinal cuisine and herbal medicine for COVID-19 prevention reported evidence supporting the potential antiviral ability of foods and herbs against SARS-CoV-2 and that foods and herbs can be used as TCM medicinal cuisine or complementary therapy to prevent infection and strengthen immunity [35]. Previous studies also supported the combination of TCM intervention and Western medicine. A systematic review with a meta-analysis on the use of Chinese herbs for COVID-19, involving 732 participants, reported that the combination of Chinese herbs and standard care has a superior effect on changes in symptoms and the sign core (− 1.30 by SMD, 95% CI [− 2.43, − 0.16]; three studies; n = 261, P = 0.03) and inflammatory marker C-reactive protein (CRP, mg/L; −11.82 by MD, 95% CI [− 17.95, − 5.69]) and suggested that Chinese herbs, as an adjunct treatment, with standard care can help improve treatment outcomes in COVID-19 cases [36]. Another systematic review that involved 19 clinical trials and 1,474 participants obtained similar results and concluded that the treatment of COVID-19 with CM and Western medicine may be effective in controlling symptoms and reducing the disease progression rate [37].

In this study, online focus group interviews are conducted because of the COVID-19 pandemic. Although some researchers believe that online methods are far from the traditional notion of face-to-face interaction, online moderators who facilitate the focus group discussion have no active role, and such methods lack participant engagement and a sense of response immediacy [38, 39], the online method used in this study made the data collection easy and safe for the CM practitioners and research team during the pandemic. Some researchers believe that Internet-assisted methods can offer effective means for capturing the essential elements in a focus group. Moreover, some studies suggested that the online environment may reduce the inhibitions of focus group participants and facilitate free-flowing discussions [40, 41]. A study comparing face-to-face focus group and online focus group discussions via 16 interview sessions (a total of 48 participants) found that the online focus group communication generated a high volume of ideas and solutions [42]. In our previous study, we also conducted online focus group interviews for qualitative data collection and examined their feasibility, convenience, and safety during the pandemic [43]. This strategy can enable the participation of an adequate number of CM practitioners, and the interviews were conducted in a timely manner. Although limitations associated with online focus group discussions exist, the effectiveness of qualitative data collection in this research and in previous studies is certain [44]. Therefore, in situations where face-toface focus group interviews are inconvenient or impractical due to certain reasons, real-time online methods can serve as promising alternatives for qualitative researchers.

For the issue of plan release and information sharing, though various channels are available to the practitioners for obtaining relevant information, such as TCM groups, social media, and professional training, the absence of an official platform or institution dedicated to the dissemination of TCM information in Hong Kong poses a significant challenge. This deficiency in the infrastructure may result in CM practitioners missing important guidance documents. The establishment of a platform would provide practitioners with a centralized and standardized resource hub and ensure the accessibility of essential guidance documents. For example, in Mainland China, the most important guidance plans are released on the official website of the central government [11]. Although several TCM platforms exist, such as the Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong [45], Hong Kong Chinese Medicine Development Fund Resource Platform [46], and GovHK Chinese Medicine Sect. [47], no official platform exists for TCM information releasing, sharing, and exchanging [48]. Thus, the creation of an electronic platform is encouraged for the release of official CM instructions or for the exchange of clinical information among CM practitioners in an effective and timely manner.

Plan localization was mentioned repeatedly by several CM practitioners. The limitations of the practicability of the plans in Hong Kong are reflected in three aspects. First, the dampness–heat pattern is the most common pattern in Hong Kong owing to its geographical location and weather [49,50]; however, the plans do not address the diagnosis and treatment of dampness–heat patterns. Second, the vast majority of patients who visit CM clinics in Hong Kong are outpatients, which differs from the mainland where the plans are more convenient for inpatients. In the future, the first CM hospital in Hong Kong will accept outpatients and inpatients [51], which may enhance the practicability of the CM plans in Hong Kong. Third, patent CMs as well as some Chinese herbs or materials for TCM medicinal cuisine therapy are not commonly used in Hong Kong owing to regulations and other factors, making their purchase difficult. Based on different situations, CM practitioners suggested supplementing the plans and allowing local CM experts to participate in their drafting or adjustment. Local CM researchers and clinical practitioners should cooperate closely to give professional and timely advice for the guidance documents during the pandemic to enhance their suitability for local use.

The research findings have several implications. For CM practitioners, this study highlights the value of the CM medicinal cuisine and non-pharmacologic therapies, to CM practitioners, especially those who are junior, to provide a more holistic care to the patients in clinical practice. For policymakers, this work identifies the merits and limitations of the current guidelines, which will inform the preparation of similar guidelines in the future. Hong Kong CM practitioners and researchers are encouraged to participate in the writing of the plans for localization. Our findings also reveal CM pracitioners’ opinions on the need for a specialized platform in Hong Kong for timely information release and experience sharing among CM practitioners and researchers. For Hong Kong citizens, this study points out that some of the suggested interventions are not available to the public, such as respiratory therapy, patent CMs, and TCM medicinal cuisine materials. Hence, the content can be further adapted to fit the local context.

Limitations

This focus group interview study has several limitations. First, we did not conduct a pilot test to examine the feasibility of the study design, which may be useful for adjusting the methods for the research questions. Second, in online focus groups, moderators may miss the participants’ body language, which may provide information on how the participants feel about a question. Third, the moderator was acquainted with the participants, and the participants were acquainted with one another owing to their occupation, which may have affected how the participants responded to the questions and interacted with one another.

Conclusions

The facilitators of the application of the plans included a variety of information sources, the feasibility of TCM medicinal cuisine and non-pharmacologic therapies, and the plans’ value for leading junior CM practitioners, supplementing Western medicine interventions, and guiding Chinese herb reserves in clinics. The barriers to the application of the plans included the lack of a specialized CM platform for information release and exchange, defective plan content, and lack of localization in Hong Kong. Accordingly, the CM practitioners expected to have a specific CM platform and to perfect the plans to make them feasible, targeted, thorough, and localized. To enhance the implementation of the anti-epidemic plans, the CM practitioners from Hong Kong expected to utilize a specific CM platform and refine the plans to ensure that they are realistic, focused, comprehensive, and tailored to the local context.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

TCM:

traditional Chinese medicine

CM:

Chinese medicine

References

  1. Ovallath S. Covid-19. New York: Nova Medicine & Health; 2020.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Acocella I. The focus groups in social research: advantages and disadvantages. Qual Quant. 2012;46(4):1125–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-011-9600-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tenforde MW, Kim SS, Lindsell CJ, Rose EB, Shapiro NI, Clark Files D, et al. Symptom duration and risk factors for delayed return to usual health among outpatients with covid-19 in a multistate health care systems network - United States, march-June 2020. MMWR Morbidity Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(30):993–8. https://doi.org/10.15585/MMWR.MM6930E1.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumenthal D, Fowler EJ, Abrams M, Collins SR. Covid-19 — implications for the health care system. N Engl J Med. 2020;383(15):1483–8. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2021088.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaklauskas A, Abraham A, Okoye K, Guggari S, Kaklauskas AA. Lessons from covid-19: impact on healthcare systems and technology. London: Academic; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Moon JR, Ascher AF. Post-covid-19 health care system: a call for community-based, person-centered, and primary care driven care. Am J Public Health (1971). 2021;111(8):1451–5. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ren Jl, Zhang AH, Wang XJ. Traditional Chinese medicine for covid-19 treatment. Pharmacol Res. 2020;155:104743. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phrs.2020.104743.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhai H. Use of patented traditional Chinese medicine against covid-19: a practical manual. New Jersey: Chemical Industry Press/World Scientific; 2021.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan CS, Bieber EJ, Bauer BA. Traditional Chinese medicine. London: Informa Healthcare; 2011.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  10. Ma Y, Chen M, Guo Y, Liu J, Chen W, Guan M, et al. Prevention and treatment of infectious diseases by traditional Chinese medicine: a commentary. APMIS: acta pathologica. Microbiol et Immunol Scand. 2019;127(5):372–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/apm.12928.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Central People’s Government of the People’s Republic of China. Notice on issuing guidance and suggestions on traditional chinese medicine rehabilitation during the recovery period of novel coronavirus pneumonia (trial) 2020 [https://www.gov.cn/zhengce/zhengceku/2020-02/24/content_5482544.htm.

  12. Chinese Medicine Regulatory Office DoH, The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Mainland chinese medicine expert group of central authorities introduces chinese medicine anti-epidemic plans 2021 [https://www.cmro.gov.hk/html/eng/whats_new/COVID-19_anti-epidemic/chinese_medicine_anti-epidemic_plans.html.

  13. Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (coreq): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–57. https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzm042.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Suri H. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qualitative Res J. 2011;11(2):63–75. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ1102063.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 4th ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: SAGE; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  16. Brooks J, McCluskey S, Turley E, King N. The utility of template analysis in qualitative psychology research. Qualitative Res Psychol. 2015;12(2):202–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2014.955224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Nigel K. University of huddersfield inspiring global professionals: Template analysis 2023 [https://research.hud.ac.uk/research-subjects/human-health/template-analysis/.

  18. Kisorio LC, Langley GC. Intensive care nurses’ experiences of end-of-life care. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016;33:30–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iccn.2015.11.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Qazi A, Spector A, Orrell M. User, carer and staff perspectives on anxiety in dementia: a qualitative study. J Affect Disord. 2010;125(1):295–300. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.12.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Forero R, Nahidi S, De Costa J, Mohsin M, Fitzgerald G, Gibson N, et al. Application of four-dimension criteria to assess rigour of qualitative research in emergency medicine. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18(1):120. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2915-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Parks, Calif: Sage; 1985.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Anderson GJ. Fundamentals of educational research. 2nd ed. London;: Falmer; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Morse JM. Critical analysis of strategies for determining rigor in qualitative inquiry. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(9):1212–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732315588501.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Walden GR. Focus group research. Los Angeles, California;: SAGE; 2012.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Yeung WF, Chen SC, Cheung DST, Wong CK, Chong TC, Ho YS, et al. Self-Administered Acupressure for Probable Knee Osteoarthritis in Middle-Aged and Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(4):e245830. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.5830.

  26. Ben-Arie E, Kao PY, Lee YC, Ho WC, Chou LW, Liu HP. The effectiveness of acupuncture in the treatment of frozen shoulder: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine. 2020;2020:9790470–14. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/9790470.

  27. Tong XL, Dong L, Chen L, Zhen Z. Treatment of diabetes using traditional Chinese medicine: past, present and future. The American journal of Chinese medicine (1979). 2012;40(5):877–86. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0192415X12500656.

  28. Li XM. Treatment of asthma and food allergy with herbal interventions from traditional Chinese medicine. Mt Sinai J Med. 2011;78(5):697–716. https://doi.org/10.1002/msj.20294.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Yeung WF, Chung KF, Leung YK, Zhang SP, Law ACK. Traditional needle acupuncture treatment for insomnia: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Sleep Med. 2009;10(7):694–704. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sleep.2008.08.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Yeung WF, Yu BYM, Chung KF, Zhang ZJ, Lao L, Ho FYY, et al. Self-administered acupressure for insomnia disorder: a randomized controlled trial. Phytomedicine. 2022 May;99:153993.

  31. Liu F, Lyu Z, Lin S, Li Z, Xiu H. Effects of moxibustion on cognition and activities of daily living in post-stroke cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2023;55(2):464–76. https://doi.org/10.1111/jnu.12846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Chen SC, Cheng HL, Han LF, Wu GT, Zhang RY, Suen LKP, et al. Parent-administered pediatric tuina for the treatment of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder symptoms: process evaluation of a pilot randomized controlled trial. Complement Ther Med. 2022;70:102854. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ctim.2022.102854.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Zou L, Sasaki JE, Wang H, Xiao Z, Fang Q, Zhang M. A systematic review and meta-analysis of baduanjin qigong for health benefits: Randomized controlled trials. Evidence-based complementary and alternative medicine. 2017;2017:4548706-17. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/4548706.

  34. Zhou X, Wang G, Lai L, Xu L, Shen Q, Wang Y, et al. Traditional Chinese medicine diet paratherapy for alleviating toxicity in chemotherapy and radiotherapy in cancer patients: a meta-analysis. Ciência E tecnologia de Aliment. 2021;41(suppl 2):753–62. https://doi.org/10.1590/fst.31720.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Panyod S, Ho CT, Sheen LY. Dietary therapy and herbal medicine for covid-19 prevention: a review and perspective. J Traditional Complement Med. 2020;10(4):420–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtcme.2020.05.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Fan AY, Gu S, Alemi SF. Chinese herbal medicine for covid-19: current evidence with systematic review and meta-analysis. J Integr Med. 2020;18(5):385–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joim.2020.07.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Luo X, Ni X, Lin J, Zhang Y, Wu L, Huang D, et al. The add-on effect of Chinese herbal medicine on covid-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Phytomedicine (Stuttgart). 2021;85:153282. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.phymed.2020.153282.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Matthews J, Cramer E. Using technology to enhance qualitative research with hidden populations. Qualitative Rep. 2015. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2008.1600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. O’Connor H, Madge C. Focus groups in cyberspace: using the internet for qualitative research. Qualitative Market Res. 2003;6(2):133–43. https://doi.org/10.1108/13522750310470190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Stover CM. The use of online synchronous focus groups in a sample of lesbian, gay, and bisexual college students. Computers Inf Nurs. 2012;30(8):395–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/NXN.0b013e3182636921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Turney L, Pocknee C. Virtual focus groups: new frontiers in research. Int J Qualitative Methods. 2005;4(2):32–43. https://doi.org/10.1177/160940690500400203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Reid DJ, Reid FJM. Online focus groups: an in-depth comparison of computer-mediated and conventional focus group discussions. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012. p. IV33.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Chen SC, Cheng HL, Wang DD, Wang SS, Yin YH, Suen LKP, et al. Experience of parents in delivering pediatric tuina to children with symptoms of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder during the covid-19 pandemic: qualitative findings from focus group interviews. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2023;23(1):53–. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-023-03891-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Tuttas CA. Lessons learned using web conference technology for online focus group interviews. Qual Health Res. 2015;25(1):122–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732314549602.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chinese Medicine Council of Hong Kong. Regulation of chinese medicine and chinese medicine practitioners [https://www.cmchk.org.hk/.

  46. Chinese Medicine Development Fund. Chinese medicine development fund chinese medicine resource platform 2012 [https://www.cmresource.hk/main.php.

  47. The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Chinese medicine: Health & medical services 2021 [https://www.gov.hk/en/residents/health/chinesemedicine/.

  48. The Government of Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. Lcq4: Developing traditional chinese medicine 2023 [https://www.info.gov.hk/gia/general/202302/15/P2023021500689.htm?fontSize=1.

  49. Ruan JY, Chen SC, Ho YS, Wong VT, Lam MY, Tsang HWH, et al. Chinese Medicine Practitioners? Consensus on Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnostic Patterns, Symptoms, and Herbal Formulas for Covid-19 Survivors: A Delphi Study. Eur J Integr Med. 2024;66:102339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2024.102339.

  50. Liu SN. A study on the correlation between hong kong ecological environment and external dampness syndrome of hong kong people. Beijing University of Chinese Medicine; 2009.

  51. Health Bureau H. Chinese medicine hospital project 2022 [https://www.healthbureau.gov.hk/en/chinese_medicine/outpatient/index.html.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors did not receive any financial assistance for conducting the research, contributing to the authorship, or publishing this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Nursing, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, 11 Yuk Choi Road, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, China

    Shu Cheng Chen, Wing Fai Yeung, Hui Lin Cheng, Man Ho Li & Yuen Shan Ho

Authors
  1. Shu Cheng Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Wing Fai Yeung
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hui Lin Cheng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Man Ho Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Yuen Shan Ho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YSH concepted and designed this study; HLC and WFY guided the methodology, YSH and MHL moderated the focus group interviews; MHL and SCC conducted data analysis; SCC drafted this manuscript; WFY and YSH edited and revised this manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuen Shan Ho.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Hong Kong Polytechnic University (HSEARS20220428008). Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants or their legal guardian.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, S.C., Yeung, W.F., Cheng, H.L. et al. Views of Hong Kong Chinese medicine practitioners on the application of the “Chinese Medicine Anti-epidemic Plans” prepared by the Chinese medicine expert group of central authorities: a focus group study. BMC Complement Med Ther 24, 184 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04469-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12906-024-04469-3

Keywords

BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies

ISSN: 2662-7671

Contact us