Skip to main content

Delayed presentation of Wilkie’s syndrome after scoliotic curve correction surgery: a case report

Abstract

Background

Superior mesenteric artery (SMA) syndrome, also known as Wilkie’s syndrome, is a rare but serious complication following scoliosis correction surgery. It occurs as a result of mechanical compression of third part of duodenum between the SMA and aorta. This condition occurs most commonly in significantly underweight patients with deformities, and usually during the first week following spinal deformity corrective surgeries. The angle between the abdominal aorta and the SMA gets reduced following spinal lengthening during deformity correction surgery causing compression of third part of duodenum resulting in development of SMA syndrome.

Case presentation.

We present a case of 17-year-old male with congenital scoliosis with a 70-degree scoliotic curve who underwent spinal deformity correction surgery with posterior instrumented fusion. Post-operative course was uneventful and the patient was discharged after suture removal on post-operative day 15. The patient presented after 21-days of symptom onset on post-operative-day 51, with a 3 week history of post-prandial vomiting, abdominal pain and distension which resulted in rapid weight loss of 11 kg. A CT-angiogram showed obstruction at third part of duodenum. After reviewing clinical and radiological profile of the patient, a diagnosis of SMA syndrome was made. Conservative management was tried, but due to rapid deterioration of patient condition and symptoms of complete intestinal obstruction, the patient was treated surgically by gastro-jejunostomy and side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy, which improved his condition.

Conclusion

SMA syndrome can occur much later than previously reported cases and with potentially life-threatening symptoms following scoliosis correction. Having a high index of suspicion, early recognition of condition and institution of appropriate treatment are essential to prevent occurrence of severe complications including risk of intestinal perforation and mortality. This case highlights management of delayed onset of SMA syndrome, with presentation further delayed after symptom onset, as is common in developing parts of the world, due to limited availability and accessibility of resources, and low socio-economic status of large segments of the population.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

SMA syndrome is one of the rare complications of scoliosis correction surgery. It occurs due to vascular compression of third part of duodenum between SMA and abdominal aorta when duodenum traverses in the axilla of SMA [1,2,3,4]. The incidence of SMA syndrome was reported to be from 0.013–4.7% [5]. Accurate diagnosis may pose a challenge, and if delayed, may lead to complete intestinal obstruction, for which emergency laparotomy may be required in order to salvage the patient. Mortality rate of up to 33% has been reported in such severe presentations [6]. With regards to SMA syndrome seen after deformity correrction surgeries, the mechanism involved is the reduction in the angle between the two vessels. The aorto-mesenteric angle ranges from 38–65 degrees and is occupied by mesenteric fat pad [7], with the aortomesenteric distance being 10-28 mm.

Conditions predisposing to SMA syndrome are vertebral lengthening after scoliosis correction, cast immobilization of spine in patient with decreased mesenteric fat (for example- underweight patients), considerable weight loss (for example- in malignancies) [8,9,10,11,12]. Corrective techniques in scoliosis result in significant lengthening of vertebral column and an extrinsic compression of distal duodenum as it passes through the sharp angle formed by aorta and spine posteriorly and the SMA anteriorly. Following scoliosis surgery this condition usually develops during first post-operative week [5, 13, 14]. We present a case of congenital scoliosis who underwent deformity correction and fusion with posterior spinal instrumentation, who had symptom onset at 4 weeks post-operatively, but presented to us with severe SMA syndrome, 7 weeks following surgery, which is a late presentation of SMA syndrome.

Case presentation

A 17-year-old male with non-contributory past history presented to our spine outpatient department with a deformity in the back noticed by the parents 2 years ago, which progressed gradually. Neurological status of the patient was normal.

On clinical examination left sided thoracolumbar curve was seen with left shoulder elevation, truncal shift to the left, left rib cage prominence posteriorly, which became more obvious on Adam’s forward bending test. There was left flank asymmetry, absence of neuro-cutaneous markers with no neuro-deficit. His weight was 51 kg and height measured 170 cm, with BMI being 17.64. Radiological evaluation shows left sided thoracolumbar curve with 70 degree Cobb’s angle with apex at D12 vertebra with D3, D7, D9 and D12 hemi-vertebra with fusion of right sided posterior element of D3 and D4 vertebra (Fig. 1, 2, 3).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Pre-operative standing, full length x-ray for scoliotic curve assessment. Cobb’s angle of 70 degrees was seen due to congenital scoliosis with D3, D7, D9 and D12 hemivertebra and fusion of right sided posterior element of D3 and D4 vertebra

Fig. 2
figure 2

Pre-operative standing, full length lateral bending xray for scoliotic curve assessment showing a stiff curve not showing significant correction by bending, implying a stiff congenital curve

Fig. 3
figure 3

Pre-operative 3D reconstruction of CT scan showing the curve and the congenital disorder of segmentation in the form of hemivertebrae, butterfly vertebra. 3-dimensional anatomy of the curve is better appreciated

Preoperative evaluation was done and patient underwent scoliosis correction with posterior instrumented fusion from D4 to L4. Post-operative Cobb’s angle was 22 degree (Fig. 4) after correction (68.5% curve-correction) and had well-balanced spine in sagittal and coronal plane (Fig. 5). Post-operative course was uneventful and patient was discharged after suture removal on postoperative day 15. Patient had episodes of vomiting after consumption of food on post-operative day 30. There was no resolution of vomiting with antiemetic medication prescribed by local healthcare provider. Patient was brought to the hospital on post-operative day 51 with multiple episodes of vomiting, abdominal pain and distension. At the time of presentation to hospital, weight of the patient was 40 kg, due to weight loss of 11 kg over 3 weeks.

Fig. 4
figure 4

Immediate post-operative radiograph after deformity correction and instrumented fusion from D4 to L4 levels, showing good curve correction of 68.5% from pre-operative measurements. Posterior instrumented fusion with contoured rods and pedicle screws are visible

Fig. 5
figure 5

Comparison of pre-operative and post-operative standing image showing the correction and corrected sagittal and coronal balance. The trunk arm distance, the position of the head, level of the shoulder have all been corrected

He was further evaluated by ultrasonography and computed tomographic angiography which showed intestinal obstruction with greatly distended stomach with first and second part of the duodenum, with collapsed third part of duodenum. CT angiography showed decreased aorto-mesenteric angle of 20 degrees (normal-38–65 degrees) along with reduced aorto-mesenteric distance of 4.4 mm (normal-10–28 mm) which confirmed diagnosis of SMA syndrome (Fig. 6a and 6b).

Fig. 6
figure 6

CT angiogram showing reduction in aorto-mesenteric distance and aorto-mesenteric angle with dilated proximal duodenum and collapsed duodenum distal to the compression site between the aorta and SMA. a Arrow points to the angle formed between the abdominal aorta and its branch, the Superior Mesenteric artery. It is reduced to 20 degrees (normal – 38–65 degrees). This causes an extrinsic vascular compression over the third part of duodenum causing symptoms of intestinal obstruction. b Yellow arrow points to the dilated proximal duodenum, Red asterisk is the SMA, Green asterisk is the abdominal aorta, Purple arrow is the collapsed distal duodenum. Aorto-mesenteric distance is 4.4 mm (normal 10-28 mm)

Medical therapy with correction of dyselectrolemia, nasogastric tube decompression and intravenous hydration, complemented with nutritional support, was initiated. The patient continued to deteriorate on medical therapy. In view of a delayed presentation, severity of symptoms, and a picture of long-standing, gradually progressive symptom complex, the patient was treated surgically by exploratory laparotomy and gastro-jejunostomy with side-to-side jejuno-jejunostomy on post-operative day 54. Intraoperatively, a grossly dilated proximal duodenum and stomach was found, and distal part of the duodenum was collapsed beyond the compression caused between the SMA and the aorta. No other significant cause of obstruction was found. Postoperative course was uneventful, and the patient made complete recovery. He was discharged 14 days after surgery. Patient is doing well at 1-year follow up with maintained spinal correction, and no recurrence of gastrointestinal symptoms or complication os surgery.

Discussion

SMA Syndrome is defined as prolonged postoperative nausea and vomiting for more than one week associated with an ileus, requiring supplemental nutrition coupled with radiological confirmation of constriction of third part of duodenum and delayed gastric emptying [15].

Symptoms of SMA syndrome usually occur after five to seven days of scoliosis surgery [5, 6, 13, 14, 16]. Patients often present with persistent bilious or non-bilious vomiting along with abdominal distension and epigastric tenderness. Post-operative paralytic ileus is a close differential, which occurs secondary to general anaesthesia, to electrolyte imbalance or to opioids for pain. Delayed onset of persistent recurrent vomiting following scoliosis correction surgery should raise suspicion of SMA syndrome especially in high risk patients, as opposed to paralytic ileus, which is usually seen immediately post-operatively [17], within a few hours to 1–2 days postoperatively and spontaneously resolves in 3–5 days [14].

At risk are those patients who underwent scoliosis surgery, had a staged procedure, a lumbar modifier of B or C as per Lenke classification, a low preoperative BMI of less than 18 [18], or patients having weight percentile for height of 5% [19]. and increased stiffness of a thoracic scoliosis [5, 20]. height > 50%, weight < 25% percentile, BMI < 25th percentile, sagittal kyphosis, increased thoracic rigidity and acute spinal lengthening. It is to be noted that the degree of scoliotic deformity correction was not significantly correlated to the development of SMA syndrome [14, 21, 22]. Our patient had a BMI of 17.64, which falls under the at-risk category. Low weight for height indirectly translates to reduced amount of body fat, including mesenteric fat.

In our case patient developed recurrent vomiting with abdominal distension on postoperative-day 30, which was managed with some anti-emetic medication by the local healthcare provider, without any improvement. Patient presented to our institute 3 weeks post-symptom onset. The delay in seeking proper healthcare for disease is commonly seen in developing parts of the world, often leading to challenges that would otherwise be possible to avoid via timely intervention.

SMA syndrome is diagnosed by a battery of tests starting with a plain abdominal X-ray, barium swallow X-ray, computed tomography (CT), abdominal ultrasound (US), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), endoscopy and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) [23].

Most of the cases of SMA syndrome can be managed conservatively in the form of insertion of nasogastric tube, intravenous hydration and correction of electrolyte imbalance – the ‘drip and suck’ approach, along with low volume, high calorie diet [17, 23]. Oral intake should be restricted. A nasojejunal feeding tube must be considered and passed distal to the site of the duodenal obstruction using imaging assistance to provide enteral feedings and achieve gradual weight gain, or if necessary total parenteral nutrition should be given [5]. Medical management may be successful in patients with a short history, moderate symptoms and incomplete duodenal obstruction [24]. Medical management should be tried for a minimum of 6 weeks in appropriate clinical setting [25]. Simple postural changes like knee chest position, left lateral decubitus position and upright position may facilitate decompression. Additional treatment strategies include strengthening of lax abdominal musculature to correct exaggerated lumbar lordosis [15, 26].

Indications for surgical management include failure of medical management for a reasonable period of time, a long interval between symptom onset and presentation, presence of life threatening complications like metabolic alkalosis, electrolyte imbalance and aspiration pneumonia and complete intestinal obstruction [27]. Most of the reported deaths by the condition involve patients in whom the diagnosis was markedly delayed or was completely missed [5]. In our case, early surgical management was proposed for the patient, in view of clinical worsening even after institution of medical therapy, to the point that the patient developed symptoms of frank complete intestinal obstruction. According to a metaanalysis of post-deformity correction SMA syndrome, 73.1% were treated conservatively 26.9% were managed operatively after the conservative treatment failed [44]. A variety of surgical options for failure of conservative management are now available-

  • Duodenojejunostomy [28, 29] being the most commonly done procedure, involves constructing an anastomosis to bypass the obstruction in the third part of the duodenum. However, the final decision of type of procedure is up to the surgeons discretion.

  • Gastro-jejunostomy [24], which was the operating surgeon’s preference as per his training, was done in this case. However, it is noteworthy that gastrojejunostomy may have increased risk of peptic ulceration and other postoperative complications like blind loop syndrome and recurrence of symptoms due to non-decompression of the duodenum. No such adverse events were seen to occur in this case.

  • Ladd procedure [30, 31]- steps of the procedure include mobilization of the Ligament of Treitz, mobilization of the right colon, complete derotation of the duodenum, delivery of the small bowel to the right upper quadrant, and appendectomy

  • Strong procedure [3, 24, 32, 33]—Division of the ligament of Treitz with mobilization of the duodenum for caudal displacement. This option has a failure rate of 25%

  • Vascular infrarenal transposition of the SMA [34]—safe and feasible surgical option with more physiologically favourable outcomes comparable to gastrointestinal bypasses

  • Various modern modalities of performing the above surgeries such as robotic surgery and laparoscopy have been used [32, 35,36,37,38,39,40]

  • Total gastrectomy with oesophago-jejunal anastomosis [41].

A table including reports of surgically managed patients has been included (Table 1).

Table 1 List of studies including patients which were required to be managed surgically over 43 years [28,29,30, 41, 43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50]

SMA arises from aorta at the level of first lumbar vertebra. Third part of duodenum lies at an acute angle ranging from 38 to 65 degrees [42], between the abdominal aorta posteriorly and SMA anteriorly, with the normal distance between them being in the range of 10-28 mm [42]. There is a positive correlation between BMI and both the above mentioned values. Hence, as BMI increases so do both the values, and vice versa. Reduction in this angle can lead to compression of duodenum which can be predisposed by many factors like rapid reduction in body weight, reduced retroperitoneal fat content, or acute spinal lengthening [19, 42]. An aortomesenteric angle below 22 degrees and an aortomesenteric distance lesser than 8 mm is the threshold for the radiological diagnosis of SMA syndrome in the appropriate clinical setting [23]. Scoliosis associated with increased sagittal kyphosis is usually associated with collapse of trunk, and following correction of deformity elongation of trunk becomes more remarkable leading to further narrowing of aorto-mesenteric angle [14]. Acute lengthening of spine during deformity correction significantly contributes to narrowing of aorto-mesenteric angle and hence leading to development of SMA syndrome [22]. Combined risk factors of low preoperative body mass index and rapid postoperative weight loss should raise index of suspicion for early diagnosis of SMA syndrome and starting appropriate management [13].

Our patient developed rapid weight loss of 11 kg post-operatively, bringing the BMI further down to 13.84, and also had acute lengthening of spinal column which predisposed to narrowing of aorto-mesenteric angle to 20 degrees and aortomesenteric distance to 4.4 mm, leading to compression of third part of duodenum and hence, to the development of SMA syndrome.

Onset of SMA syndrome usually starts within 7 days of spinal deformity correction surgery, but late onset disease has been reported in literature ranging from several weeks to 4 years after scoliosis surgery [15, 16, 20, 43]. Onset of symptoms in this case was late, started from post-operative day 30, and diagnosis of SMA syndrome was confirmed when radiological investigations were performed when at the time of presentation of the patient to our institute 3 weeks after symptom onset, on post-operative day 51. Hence, this case reports late presentation of SMA syndrome with further delay in seeking specialist medical care, along with failure of conservative management and patient deterioration, and hence was treated surgically in the form of gastro-jejunostomy with side to side jejuno-jejunostomy.

Conclusion

Early diagnosis and management are the key factors for successful treatment of SMA syndrome. Most of the patients who undergo early diagnosis can be managed conservatively in the form of nasogastric decompression, electrolyte correction and nutritional support. High index of suspicion will lead to early diagnosis and appropriate conservative management.

The significance of close monitoring of rapid post-operative weight loss and need for early intervention cannot be over-emphasized. We have presented a case of SMA syndrome with late onset and further delay in seeking specialist medical attention, leading to failure of conservative management hence required surgical treatment in the form of gastro-jejunostomy and side to side jejuno-jejunostomy.

If diagnosis of SMA syndrome is missed, it can cause considerable morbidity and result into potentially life threatening complications like intestinal perforation, septicaemia and mortality.

Availability of data and materials

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

SMA:

Superior mesenteric artery

CT:

Computed Tomography

References

  1. Dorph MH. The cast syndrome: review of the literature and report of a case. N Engl J Med. 1950;243:440–2. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM195009212431203.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmed AR, Taylor I. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 1997;73:776–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Strong EK. Mechanics of arteriomesenteric duodenal obstruction and direct surgical attack upon etiology. Ann Surg. 1958;148:725–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Wilkie DPD. Chronic duodenal ileus. Br Med J. 1921;2:793–5.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Tsirikos AI, Jeans LA. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in children and adolescents with spine deformities undergoing corrective surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2005;18:26371.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hod-Feins R, Copeliovitch L, Abu-Kishk I, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome after scoliosis repair surgery: a case study and reassessment of the syndrome’s pathogenesis. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2007;16:345–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilkie DPD. Chronic duodenal ileus. Br J Surg. 2005;9(34):204–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bjs.1800093405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Almgren B, Juhl M. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome complicating treatment with balanced traction: a case report. Acta Orthop Scand. 1977;48(1):25–8. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453677708985106

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Barner HB, Sherman CD. Vascular compression of the duodenum. Int Abstr Surg. 1963;117:103–18.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hutchinson DT, Bassett GS. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in pediatric orthopedic patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1990;250:250–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Reckler JM, Bruck HM, R M, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome as a consequence of burn injury. J Trauma. 1972;12(11):979–85. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197211000-00008.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lescher TJ, Sirinek KR, Pruitt BA. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in thermally injured patients. J Trauma Inj Infect Crit Care. 1979;19(8):567–71. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-197908000-00004.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Altiok H, Lubicky JP, DeWald CJ, Herman J. The superior mesenteric artery syndrome in patients with spinal deformity. Spine. 2005;30:2164–70. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000181059.83265.b2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhu ZZ, Qiu Y. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following scoliosis surgery: its risk indicators and treatment strategy. World J Gastroenterol. 2005;11:3307–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Maharajan K, Thambiah JS. Unusual delayed presentation of superior mesentericartery syndrome following scoliosis correction surgery—a case report and review of literature. J Spine Surg. 2017;3(2):272–7. https://doi.org/10.21037/jss.2017.06.09.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Abol Oyoun N, Kadhim M, Dormans JP. Late-onset superior mesenteric artery syndrome four years following scoliosis surgery – a case report. SICOT-J. 2015;1:12. https://doi.org/10.1051/sicotj/2015010.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Lam DJL, Lee JZJ, Chua JHY, Lee YT, Lim KBL. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following surgery for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: A case series, review of the literature, and an algorithm for management. J Pediatr Orthop B. 2014;23(4):312–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24681492/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Smith BG, Hakim-Zargar M, Thomson JD. Low body mass index: A risk factor for superior mesenteric artery syndrome in adolescents undergoing spinal fusion for scoliosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009;22(2):144–8. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19342937/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shah MA, Albright MB, Vogt MT, Moreland MS. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome in scoliosis surgery: weight percentile for height as an indicator of risk. J Pediatr Orthop. 2003:665–668. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004694-200309000-00018. Published online September.

  20. Braun SV, Hedden DM, Howard AW. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following spinal deformity correction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(10):2252. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.E.00348.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Abulhail S, Elmhiregh A, Moghamis I, Baco AM. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome after scoliosis correction surgery - A case report. Journal of Orthopaedic Reports. 2022;1(4):100086. Available from:  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jorep.2022.100086.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Qian BP, Ji ML, Jiang J, Zhu ZZ, Wan B, Qiu Y. Anatomic relationship between superior mesenteric artery and aorta before and after surgical correction of thoracolumbar kyphosis. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2013;26(7):E293–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/BSD.0b013e318286b8f6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Oka A, Awoniyi M, Hasegawa N, Yoshida Y, Tobita H, Ishimura N, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: Diagnosis and management. World J Clin Cases. 2023;11(15):3369–84. Available from: https://doi.org/10.12998/wjcc.v11.i15.3369.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Chrysikos D, Troupis T, Tsiaoussis J, Sgantzos M, Bonatsos V, Karampelias V, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: a rare case of upper gastrointestinal obstruction. J Surg Case Rep. 2019;2019(3):rjz054. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1093/jscr/rjz054.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Shin MS, Kim JY. Optimal duration of medical treatment in superior mesenteric artery syndrome in children. J Korean Med Sci. 2013;28(8):1220. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3346/jkms.2013.28.8.1220.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  26. Hines JR, Gore RM, Ballantyne GH. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Am J Surg. 1984;148(5):630–2. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/6496852/.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mandarry M, Zhao L, Zhang C, et al. A comprehensive review of superior mesenteric artery syndromeÜbersicht zum Arteria mesenterica superior-Syndrom. Eur Surg. 2010;42:229–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Moskovich R, Cheong-Leen P. Vascular compression of the duodenum. J R Soc Med. 1986;79:465–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Keskin M, Akgul T, Bayraktar A, et al. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: an infrequent complication of scoliosis surgery. Case Rep Surg. 2014;2014:263431.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Amy BW, Priebe CJJr, King A. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome associated with scoliosis treated by a modified Ladd procedure. J Pediatr Orthop. 1985;5:361–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Alsulaimy M, Tashiro J, Perez EA, Sola JE. Laparoscopic Ladd’s procedure for superior mesenteric artery syndrome. J Pediatr Surg. 2014;49(10):1533–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25280662/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wasef K, Hudnall A, Schmidt CR, Marsh JW, Boone BA. Robotic modified Strong procedure for superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11(7):e7651. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.7651.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  33. Merrett ND, Wilson RB, Cosman P, Biankin AV. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome: Diagnosis and treatment strategies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2009;13(2):287–92. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18810558/.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Ali T, Tomka J, Bakirli I, Bakirov I. Surgical treatment of Wilkie’s syndrome by vascular transposition. Cureus. 2022;14(4):e24251. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/35475250/.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Robotic gastrojejunostomy to treat superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a young adult male [Internet]. ACS. [cited 2024 Apr 14]. Available from: https://www.facs.org/for-medical-professionals/news-publications/journals/case-reviews/issues/v4n2/16-seaver-robotic-gastrojejunostomy/

  36. Yao S-Y. Minimally invasive surgery for superior mesenteric artery syndrome: A case report. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(45):12970. Available from: https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v21.i45.12970.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Alnaami MY. Robotic management of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2012;22(3):e144–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22678337/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Barchi LC, Alves AM, Jacob CE, Caldas Bresciani CJ, Yagi OK, Nogueira TG, et al. Favorable minimal invasive surgery in the treatment of superior mesenteric artery syndrome: Case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2016;29:223–6. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27914348/.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  39. Prieto JM, Halbach JL, Ignacio RC, Lazar DA. Laparoscopic duodenojejunostomy for superior mesenteric artery syndrome in a 13 year-old boy. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2021;69(101866):101866. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsc.2021.10186621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kingham TP, Shen R, Ren C. Laparoscopic treatment of superior mesenteric artery syndrome. JSLS. 2004;8(4):376–9. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/15554285/.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Kennedy RH, Cooper MJ. An unusually severe case of the cast syndrome. Postgrad Med J. 1983;59:539–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Ozkurt H, Cenker MM, Bas N, Erturk SM, Basak M. Measurement of the distance and angle between the aorta and superior mesenteric artery: normal values in different BMI categories. Surg Radiol Anat. 2007;29(7):595–9. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-007-0238-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Pan CH, Tzeng ST, Chen CS, Chen PQ. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome complicating staged corrective surgery for scoliosis. J Formos Med Assoc. 2007;106(2):S37–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-6646(09)60351-X.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Fan Y, Cai M, Wang J, Xia L. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following scoliosis surgery: A systematic review of case reports. Ann Vasc Surg. 2021;76:514–35. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33905850/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Andrews SN, Sanders G, Cooper MJ. The acute surgical abdomen following Kyphoscoliosis corrective surgery. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2005;87(5):3–5. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16402459/.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Horn PL, Beeb AC, King DR. A Rare Cause of Postoperative Abdominal Pain in a Spinal Fusion Patient. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2015;44(9):E350–4. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26372764/.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cullis PS, Gallagher M, Sabharwal AJ, Hammond P. Minimally invasive surgery for superior mesenteric artery syndrome: a case report and literature review. Scott Med J. 2016;61(1):42–7. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26659453/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. A. Crowther MA, Webb PJ, Eyre-Brook IA. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome following surgery for scoliosis. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;27(24):E528. Available from: https://journals.lww.com/spinejournal/abstract/2002/12150/superior_mesenteric_artery_syndrome_following.23.aspx

  49. Ovalle-Chao C, Hinojosa-Martinez LM, Gutierrez-Castillo A, Velazco-De La Garza JH, Flores-Villalba E, Diaz-Elizondo JA, et al. Acute-onset of superior mesenteric artery syndrome following surgical correction of scoliosis: Case report and review of literature. J Pediatr Surg Case Rep. 2017;19:31–3. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsc.2017.02.008

  50. Rai RR, Shah S, Palliyil NS, Dalvie S, Shah R. Superior mesenteric artery syndrome complicating spinal deformity correction surgery: A case report and review of the literature. JBJS Case Connect. 2019;9(4):e0497–e0497. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31789665/.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

Not applicable.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

T. R. was the treating surgeon and compiled all the data regarding the case. Y. V., D. J. and A. P. have prepared and performed the final edits of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yash Prakash Ved.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable as this is a case report of a rare complication of spinal surgery treated with standard of care protocol.

Consent for publication

Written informed consent for publication of their clinical details and/or clinical images was obtained from the patient/parent/guardian/ relative of the patient. A copy of the consent form is available for review by the Editor of this journal.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rathod, T., Ved, Y.P., Jain, D. et al. Delayed presentation of Wilkie’s syndrome after scoliotic curve correction surgery: a case report. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25, 329 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07462-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07462-6

Keywords