Skip to main content
Download PDF

Association between preoperative lactate level and early complications after surgery for isolated extremity fracture

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders volume 25, Article number: 314 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

The role of lactate level in selecting the timing of definitive surgery for isolated extremity fracture remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the use of preoperative lactate level for predicting early postoperative complications.

Methods

This was a single-center retrospective observational study of patients with isolated extremity fracture who underwent orthopedic surgery. Patients who underwent lactate level assessment within 24 h prior to surgery were included. The incidence of early postoperative complications was compared between patients with a preoperative lactate level of ≥ 2 and < 2 mmol/L. Moreover, subgroup analyses were performed based on the time from hospital arrival to surgery and fracture type.

Results

In total, 187 patients were included in the study. The incidence of postoperative complications was significantly higher in patients with a preoperative lactate level of ≥ 2 mmol/L than those with a preoperative lactate level of < 2 mmol/L. This result did not change after adjusting for age and severity. Further, a high preoperative lactate level was associated with a greater incidence of postoperative complications in patients who underwent definitive surgery within 6 h after arrival.

Conclusion

A preoperative lactate level of ≥ 2 mmol/L was associated with a greater incidence of early postoperative complications in isolated extremity fractures. Nevertheless, this correlation was only observed among patients who underwent definitive fixation within 6 h after hospital arrival.

Peer Review reports

Introduction

Extremity fracture is a major public health issue, and surgical treatment and long-term rehabilitation are required to help patients continually perform activities of daily living [1]. Given the anticipated rise in extremity fractures owing to the aging population [2, 3], a multidisciplinary approach is essential to mitigate functional impairment post-injury [4]. Among various interventions, expedited bone fixation has been identified as one of the most efficacious treatments in various studies. as supported by multiple studies [5,6,7,8].

The mortality rate after hip fracture has reduced with bone fixation within 24 h after injury [9, 10]. However, data regarding the appropriate timing of open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for isolated extremity fracture are limited. Several management protocols for poly or severe trauma, such as early appropriate care, safe definitive surgery, and damage control orthopedics, have been extensively examined [9, 10]. Nevertheless, there is still no validated protocol for early ORIF that does not increase the incidence of postoperative complications among patients with an isolated extremity fracture. Furthermore, some studies investigated the application of preoperative hemodynamic status for developing a prognostic score for orthopedic surgery [11]. However, the application of these protocols for determining the appropriate timing of ORIF for isolated extremity fracture has not been confirmed.

Lactate is an excellent metabolic marker that is used indirectly to monitor resuscitation in poly-trauma [12]. Considering that serum lactate level has been used to determine the optimal timing of ORIF in patients with severe poly-trauma [13], elevated serum lactate levels could be useful for detecting insufficient resuscitation among patients with isolated extremity fracture. Therefore, it is convenient for decision-making regarding surgical timing. Hence, the current study aimed to elucidate whether lower preoperative lactate level than the certain threshold is a suitable indicator for the safety of orthopedic surgery. We hypothesized that confirming that preoperative lactate level is lower than the certain threshold before the initiation of definitive orthopedic surgery is associated with a lower incidence of early complications.

Materials and methods

Study design and setting

This was a single-center retrospective observational study conducted in 2021 at a university hospital in Tokyo, Japan. The institution is a tertiary care facility that handles all types of extremity injuries, including high-energy trauma and isolated bone fracture. The obtained data was collected from 2013 to 2020. The authors did not access to information that could identify individual participants after data collection. The data collection was performed from October 1st to 8th 2021. The data was accessed from October 12th to 29th 2021. This research has been approved by the Keio University School of Medicine, Ethics Committee (application number: 20,180,222). The requirement for informed consent was waived because of the anonymous nature of the data used.

At the study institution, lactate levels are measured on hospital arrival in all patients and serial measurements were conducted in some patients based on the decision of a treating physician. Patients with extremity fracture were either transported from the scene or transferred from other hospitals. These patients were initially assessed by emergency physicians and then assessed by an orthopedic surgeon within 30 min. During an initial assessment, trauma survey was done in accordance with ATLS (Advanced Trauma Life Support). Fluid resuscitation was conducted for patients with hemodynamic instability and blood products were transfused when continuous bleeding was observed. Hemodynamic monitoring continued until the ORIF. Management strategy for ORIF, including the necessity of external fixation and the timing of definitive surgery, was determined via a discussion among emergency physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Generally, the resources such as operating room (OR), basic orthopedic implants, and skilled surgeon were always available and most patients underwent definitive surgeries within 24 h after hospital arrival.

Study population

Patients with extremity fracture who underwent orthopedic surgery were identified by reviewing medical records. The inclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients aged ≥ 18 years; (2) those who underwent definitive bone fixation including ORIF, hemiarthroplasty, and arthroplasty; and (3) those who underwent lactate level assessment within 24 h before orthopedic surgery. Meanwhile, the exclusion criteria were as follows: (1) patients with poly-trauma, defined as an Abbreviated Injury Scale score of > 2, in the head, face, neck, chest, or abdomen; (2) those with severe injuries, defined as an Injury Severity Score (ISS) of > 16 [14]; (3) those who underwent external fixation before definitive bone fixation; and (4) those who had other surgical procedures prior to orthopedic surgery, including thoracotomy, laparotomy, and craniotomy.

Data collection and definitions

The medical records of patients were reviewed and retrieved by both emergency physicians and orthopedic surgeons. The obtained data included demographics; comorbidities; vital signs upon hospital arrival; serum lactate level, type of blood sample (arterial vs. venous); time from hospital arrival to surgery; severity, mechanism, and site of injury; type of fracture (open or closed) and surgery; postoperative complications; length of hospital stay; and survival status at discharge.

Preoperative serum lactate level was defined as lactate value obtained within 24 h before orthopedic surgery. When they were measured multiple times, the most recent value was utilized. The threshold for lactate level was set as 2.0 mmol/L and high preoperative lactate was defined as lactate level of ≥ 2mmol/L based on previous studies for other diseases [15]. OR waiting time was defined as time between hospital arrival and the initiation of ORIF.

The postoperative complications included cerebral disease (cerebral infarction, cerebral hemorrhage, and other brain disorders), cardiac arrest, new-onset or exacerbated cardiovascular disease, hospital-acquired pneumonia, respiratory failure requiring oxygen therapy, acute kidney injury, urethral tract infection, acute liver injury, deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism, gastric ulcer diagnosed via esophagogastroduodenoscopy, and mortality according to the Clavien-Dindo Classification (severer than grade 2) [16].

Outcome measures

The primary outcome was the incidence of 30-day postoperative complications. The secondary outcomes were length of hospital stay and survival at discharge.

Statistical analysis

Patients were divided into the high- or low-lactate groups based on a preoperative lactate level (high-lactate, ≥2mmol/L and low-lactate, <2mmol/L). The primary and secondary outcomes were compared between the two groups using the Chi-square test and the Mann–Whitney U test. Then, multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to adjust for age, ISS, and fracture type, where the number of covariates were limited considering the small sample size.

Several sensitivity analyses were conducted. First, another multivariate logistic model was developed using backward stepwise methods that included all available covariates, such as sex, systolic blood pressure, heart rate, injury site, fracture type, Gustilo classification, type of surgery, and OR waiting time in addition to the covariates in the primary model. Second, venous lactate levels were adjusted to arterial ones by subtracting 0.2 mmol/L and the primary logistic model was examined [17, 18]. Third, patients with considerably minor injury such as phalange fracture (open/closed digit/toe fractures) were excluded and the primary logistic model was repeated. Additionally, post-operative complication rates were compared between those achieving and not achieving lactate clearance, wherein lactate clearance was defined as a decrease in lactate level to < 2.0 mmol/L from ≥ 2.0mmol/L .

Subgroup analyses were performed in the all patients who were divided based on OR waiting time (< 6 and ≥ 6 h) and fracture type (open vs. closed). In each subgroup analysis, complication rates were compared between patients with high and low lactate level after adjusting age, ISS, fracture type, Gustilo classification, and OR waiting time.

Descriptive statistics were presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]) or number [percentage]). Results were expressed as 95% confidence interval (CI). In the hypothesis testing, a two-sided α threshold of 0.05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were conducted using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences software version 26 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).

Results

A total of 187 patients with isolated extremity fracture underwent definitive bone fixation without external fixation and available preoperative lactate was eligible for this study (Fig. 1). Among them, 47 (25.1%) had high preoperative lactate. The patient characteristics were shown in Table 1. The lactate levels were 2.3 [2.1–2.8] mmol/L and 1.1 [0.9–1.5] mmol/L in the high- and low-lactate groups, respectively. The mean age and OR waiting time of the high- and low- lactate groups were 57 (44–74) and 78 (55–86) years; and 4.7 (3.2–9.9) and 5.2 (3.5–8.2) h, respectively. The numbers of open fractures were 25 (53.2%) in the high-lactate group and 47 (33.6%) in the low-lactate group. Details of postoperative complications were shown in Table 2.

Patients with high-lactate levels had a significantly greater incidence of postoperative complications than those with low-lactate levels (10 [21.3%] vs. 13 [9.3%], odds ratio [OR] = 2.64 [95% CI = 1.07–6.50], p = 0.04, Table 3), which remained in the multivariate logistic regression analysis (adjusted OR = 3.65 [1.37–9.74], p = 0.01, Table 3). Moreover, all sensitivity analysis, including another logistic regression model using all available covariates, revealed similar results (Table S1, S2 and S3). Lengths of hospital stay were comparable between the high- and low-lactate groups (16 vs. 17 days, Table 3) and no mortalities were observed in both groups.

In the subgroup analysis, a high preoperative lactate level was associated with higher incidence of 30-day postoperative complications in patients with an OR waiting time of < 6 h (OR = 4.87 [1.24–19.20], Table 4).

Fig. 1
figure 1

Patient flow diagram

Of 372 patients who underwent definitive bone fixation, 187 were eligible for this study. Then, 47 and 140 were allocated to the high- and low-lactate group, respectively

Full size image
Table 1 Characteristics of patients with isolated extremity fracture
Full size table
Table 2 Details of major complications with isolated extremity fracture
Full size table
Table 3 Postoperative complications and secondary outcomes
Full size table
Table 4 Postoperative complications in subgroup analysis
Full size table

Discussion

In this study, patients with a preoperative lactate level of ≥ 2 mmol/L had a significantly higher incidence of postoperative complications after definitive bone fixation for isolated extremity fracture than those with a preoperative lactate level of < 2 mmol/L. Notably, multivariate analyses after adjusting for age and severity of injury revealed the same results, that were also validated with several sensitivity analyses. Considering that short-term postoperative complications in isolated extremity fractures affected long-term functional outcomes [22, 23], the current results would propose further studies to examine the association between high lactate level and long-term functional consequences after extremity fractures.

Some pathophysiological mechanisms could be considered behind the association between higher lactate levels and a greater number of complications after orthopedic surgery in patients with isolated fracture. First, considering that the lactate level is elevated if hypoperfusion inhibits tissue oxygenation [19], a high-lactate level could indicate hidden blood loss even in patients with isolated extremity fracture [20]. Therefore, additional surgical insult was evident among patients with preoperative physiological instability alone [21]. Second, the threshold for high- and low-lactate level was set as 2.0 mmol/L, which is lower than that in studies of patients with poly-trauma (2.5–4.0 mmol/L) [9, 10]. A significant association between high-lactate levels and a greater number of postoperative complications could be attributed to the use of a lower threshold for differentiating patients with a high risk for bone fixation. Third, frailty, which is a background characteristic of patients, could reflect a high-lactate level [21]. This study included patients with fragility fractures caused by metabolic bone diseases, and serum lactate level could be a surrogate marker of pathophysiological vulnerability.

The association between high lactate levels and a greater number of postoperative complications was observed among patients who were transferred to the OR within 6 h. This result would be clinically useful to detect the premature surgery in isolated extremity fracture. In addition, patients with closed fracture showed the significant correlation between high lactate level and postoperative complications. Although the interpretation should be cautioned due to the small sample size, this result would suggest that relatively less-severe injuries may introduce post-operative complications if preoperative condition is disturbed.

Contrary, a higher preoperative lactate level did not have a significant influence on the length of hospital stay and survival status at discharge in this study. This could be caused by the inclusion of a small sample size and relatively less severe injury in the study population. The median length of hospital stay was ∼2 weeks, and no mortalities were identified. Moreover, as patients were only followed-up within a short period (maximum: 59 days) until hospital discharge, longer-term follow-up can identify any difference in mortality.

The current study had several limitations. First, the study setting could relatively be uncommon, where serum lactate level was measured in all isolated extremity fracture patients and most isolated fractures underwent definitive bone fixation within 24 h after arrival. Second, the preoperative lactate level obtained within 24 h prior to the surgery was used. Therefore, more frequent serial blood sampling could have different results [24]. Third, the current study did not examine other clinical parameters, such as base deficit [25], coagulopathy, and requirement of blood transfusion, which were considered valuable in decision-making regarding the timing of ORIF among patients with poly-trauma [9, 10]. Fourth, only a threshold value of 2.0 mmol/L was used based on previous studies for patients without fractures, and whether different thresholds can be applied remains unknown [26, 27]. Finally, this was a single-center retrospective study with a small sample size. Therefore, the results were not conclusive. Nevertheless, further prospective studies with a larger population should be performed to validate our results.

Conclusion

A preoperative lactate level of ≥ 2.0 mmol/L was associated with early postoperative complications in patients with isolated extremity fracture. As such association was observed in patients with an OR waiting time of < 6 h, a lactate < 2.0 mmol/L would be recommended to be confirmed before ORIF for isolated extremity fracture.

Data availability

The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available because it was not permitted by study participants during consent process, but are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request under appropriate regulations.

References

  1. Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: a review. Injury. 2006;37(8):691–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cauley JA. Osteoporosis: fracture epidemiology update 2016. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2017;29(2):150–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Briggs AM, Cross MJ, Hoy DG, Sànchez-Riera L, Blyth FM, Woolf AD, et al. Musculoskeletal Health conditions represent a global threat to healthy aging: a report for the 2015 World Health Organization World Report on Ageing and Health. Gerontologist. 2016;56(Suppl 2):S243–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bach JA, Leskovan JJ, Scharschmidt T, Boulger C, Papadimos TJ, Russell S, et al. The right team at the right time - multidisciplinary approach to multi-trauma patient with orthopedic injuries. Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2017;7(1):32–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yamashita K, Zenke Y, Sakai A, Oshige T, Moritani S, Maehara T. Comparison of functional outcome between early and delayed internal fixation using Volar Locking plate for distal Radius fractures. J uoeh. 2015;37(2):111–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Schepers T, De Vries MR, Van Lieshout EM, Van der Elst M. The timing of ankle fracture surgery and the effect on infectious complications; a case series and systematic review of the literature. Int Orthop. 2013;37(3):489–94.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Copp J, Sivasundaram L, Abola MV, Schell A, Trivedi NN, Ochenjele G. Is timing to surgery an independent risk factor for complications following operative treatment of Periprosthetic Lower Extremity fractures? J Orthop Trauma. 2021;35(6):315–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Menendez ME, Ring D. Does the timing of surgery for proximal humeral fracture affect inpatient outcomes? J Shoulder Elb Surg. 2014;23(9):1257–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Nahm NJ, Como JJ, Wilber JH, Vallier HA. Early appropriate care: definitive stabilization of femoral fractures within 24 hours of injury is safe in most patients with multiple injuries. J Trauma. 2011;71(1):175–85.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Pape HC, Giannoudis PV, Krettek C, Trentz O. Timing of fixation of major fractures in blunt polytrauma: role of conventional indicators in clinical decision making. J Orthop Trauma. 2005;19(8):551–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Yamamoto R, Udagawa K, Yusho N, Soichiro O, Junichi S. Clinical parameters and optimal candidates for early definitive fixation of extremity injury: a nationwide study. J Orthop Sci. 2021.

  12. Wardi G, Brice J, Correia M, Liu D, Self M, Tainter C. Demystifying lactate in the Emergency Department. Ann Emerg Med. 2020;75(2):287–98.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Pape HC, Halvachizadeh S, Leenen L, Velmahos GD, Buckley R, Giannoudis PV. Timing of major fracture care in polytrauma patients - an update on principles, parameters and strategies for 2020. Injury. 2019;50(10):1656–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Copes WS, Champion HR, Sacco WJ, Lawnick MM, Keast SL, Bain LW. The Injury Severity score revisited. J Trauma. 1988;28(1):69–77.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Rhodes A, Evans LE, Alhazzani W, Levy MM, Antonelli M, Ferrer R, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: International guidelines for Management of Sepsis and Septic Shock: 2016. Intensive Care Med. 2017;43(3):304–77.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004;240(2):205–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Bloom BM, Grundlingh J, Bestwick JP, Harris T. The role of venous blood gas in the emergency department: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Emerg Med. 2014;21(2):81–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Gallagher EJ, Rodriguez K, Touger M. Agreement between peripheral venous and arterial lactate levels. Ann Emerg Med. 1997;29(4):479–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Bakker J, Postelnicu R, Mukherjee V. Lactate: where are we now? Crit Care Clin. 2020;36(1):115–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Magdesian KG, Fielding CL, Rhodes DM, Ruby RE. Changes in central venous pressure and blood lactate concentration in response to acute blood loss in horses. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2006;229(9):1458–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dekker SE, de Vries HM, Lubbers WD, van de Ven PM, Toor EJ, Bloemers FW, et al. Lactate clearance metrics are not superior to initial lactate in predicting mortality in trauma. Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2017;43(6):841–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Sheehan KJ, Williamson L, Alexander J, Filliter C, Sobolev B, Guy P, et al. Prognostic factors of functional outcome after hip fracture surgery: a systematic review. Age Ageing. 2018;47(5):661–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Naja AS, Bouji N, Eddine MN, Alfarii H, Reindl R, Tfayli Y, et al. A Meta-analysis comparing external fixation against Open reduction and internal fixation for the management of Tibial Plateau fractures. Strategies Trauma Limb Reconstr. 2022;17(2):105–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Fan SL, Miller NS, Lee J, Remick DG. Diagnosing sepsis - the role of laboratory medicine. Clin Chim Acta. 2016;460:203–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Davis JW, Dirks RC, Kaups KL, Tran P. Base deficit is superior to lactate in trauma. Am J Surg. 2018;215(4):682–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Venkatesan M, Smith RP, Balasubramanian S, Khan A, Uzoigwe CE, Coats TJ, et al. Serum lactate as a marker of mortality in patients with hip fracture: a prospective study. Injury. 2015;46(11):2201–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Uzoigwe CE, Venkatesan M, Smith R, Burnand HG, Young PS, Cheesman CL, et al. Serum lactate is a prognostic indicator in patients with hip fracture. Hip Int. 2012;22(5):580–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

None.

Funding

No funding exists in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku, Tokyo, 160-8582, Japan

    Yusho Nishida, Ryo Yamamoto, Soichiro Ono & Junichi Sasaki

Authors
  1. Yusho Nishida
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ryo Yamamoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Soichiro Ono
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Junichi Sasaki
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

Y.N. and R.Y. designed the study. Y.N. performed data collection. Y.N. and R.Y. performed data analysis and interpretation. Y.N., R.Y., S.O. and J.S. performed writing and critical revision. All authors revised the article.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yusho Nishida.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study obtained approval from institutional review board for conducting research with human participants at Keio University School of Medicine (approval number: 20180222). Written informed consent was waived due to the anonymity of data.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Supplementary Material 2

Supplementary Material 3

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nishida, Y., Yamamoto, R., Ono, S. et al. Association between preoperative lactate level and early complications after surgery for isolated extremity fracture. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 25, 314 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07409-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-024-07409-x

Keywords

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

ISSN: 1471-2474

Contact us