Skip to main content

Comparison of integron mediated antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from urinary and bacteremic sources

Abstract

Background

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global threat driven mainly by horizontal gene transfer (HGT) mechanisms through mobile genetic elements (MGEs) including integrons. The variable region (VR) of an integron can acquire or excise gene cassettes (GCs) that confer resistance to antibiotics based on the selection pressure. Escherichia coli plays a significant role in the genetic transfer of resistance determinants to other Gram-negative bacteria. Current study is aimed to detect and compare integron-mediated resistance in clinical isolates of E. coli. Unique isolates of E. coli from urine or blood cultures were studied for their antimicrobial resistance patterns and integrons were detected using polymerase chain reaction assays followed by Sanger sequencing of GCs.

Results

During the study period, a total of 470 E. coli isolates were obtained, 361 (76.8%) from urinary and 109 (23.1%) from bacteremic sources. Class 1 integrons were detected in 66 (18.2%) and 26 (23.8%) isolates respectively. Urinary isolates of E. coli harbouring Class 1 integrons demonstrated significantly higher rates of resistance (p < 0.05) for most antibiotics (12/16, 75%) compared to integron negative isolates. Although not statistically significant, similar differences were observed in bacteremic isolates. Among the urinary isolates, 27 (40.9%) had a VR, in which the most common GC array detected was DfrA17-AadA5 (n = 14), followed by DfrA5 (n = 4) and DfrA12 (n = 3). Among bacteremic isolates, only 4 (15.3%) had a VR, all of which were carrying DfrA17. The detected GC array correlated with the respective isolates’ phenotypic resistance patterns.

Conclusion

We found a strong correlation between integron positivity and trimethoprim resistance among E. coli from urinary sources. Although higher rates of resistance were observed in bacteremic isolates, they mostly carried empty integrons.

Peer Review reports

Background

The imminent global threat of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is particularly important due to the acquisition and transfer of resistance genes among bacteria harbored in humans, animals, and the environment. Among several human pathogenic bacteria, Escherichia coli, an important member of Enterobacterales, plays a major role in the genetic transfer of resistance to other Gram-negative bacteria [1, 2]. The spread of resistance mainly occurs through horizontal gene transfer (HGT) which is mediated by certain mobile genetic elements (MGEs) that promote intercellular and intracellular mobility of DNA such as insertion sequences (IS), transposons, plasmids, integrons, etc. While IS and transposons are mobile and can be inserted into random locations along with the resistance genes they carry, elements such as integrons depend on site-specific recombination to mobilise their resistance genes. Hence they can become mobile when associated with other MGEs such as transposons [3].

Integrons are considered a major driver contributing to the evolution and spread of resistance as they can acquire various unrelated antimicrobial resistance genes (ARGs) enabling multidrug resistance in bacteria. They contain a recombination system that is site-specific allowing them to capture, rearrange, and exchange gene cassettes (GCs). All integrons possess three elements for their proper functioning- tyrosine recombinase integrase encoded by the intI gene, a recombination site attI, and a constitutive promoter Pc found upstream of the site of integration and is required for expression of the GCs [4]. The GCs embedded within the integron are the variable sequences as they can be excised or acquired, depending on the requirement [3, 5].

Among the 5 classes, Class 1 integron is the most ubiquitous found in diverse bacterial genera such as E. coli, Salmonella, Shigella, Vibrio, Campylobacter, and Pseudomonas. Class 1 integrons are associated with transposon Tn402, usually inserted within a larger transposon Tn21. Integron-positive clinical bacterial strains usually carry less than 5 cassettes in varied combinations [6].

We carried out this study to understand the occurrence of class 1 integrons in clinical isolates of E. coli obtained from urine cultures or blood cultures (henceforth referred to as urinary and bacteremic isolates respectively) and to identify the GCs carried in their variable region (VR). The findings were further correlated with the phenotypic resistance patterns of the isolates.

Methods

The study was conducted in the Microbiology laboratory attached to a University teaching hospital in the southwest region of India. Unique clinical isolates of E. coli obtained from urine cultures or blood cultures were collected between March 2022 and February 2023. Isolates were identified by MALDI-TOF (Vitek-MS) and antimicrobial susceptibility tests (AST) were performed using the VITEK 2 system. Fresh isolates were subcultured once to check purity, and DNA was extracted immediately by heat lysis method and stored at -20 °C for molecular assays [7].

All isolates were screened for the presence of class 1 integrons. A single-plex polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was designed using the primers IntI-1 as previously described [7]. Twenty-five µL of the reaction constituted 2x PCR MasterMix (ThermoFisher), 25 pmol of forward and reverse primers and 3 µL (600 pg) of template DNA. PCR amplification was carried out using the following conditions: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 30 s of denaturation at 94 °C, 30 s of annealing at 54 °C, and 60 s of extension at 72 °C, with a final extension at 72 °C for 7 minutes [7]. An isolate confirmed to contain the integrase gene by sequencing was used as positive control.

Further, amplification of the VR of these integrons was performed to determine the gene cassettes they were carrying. Isolates positive for class 1 integron were subjected to PCR using primers previously described [7]. The reaction mixture was prepared similarly. The PCR parameters were also similar to that mentioned above, with the exception of annealing temperature set at 53 °C.

The PCR products were purified and sequenced using Sangers technique. The sequences obtained were analyzed by comparing using BLAST software (National Center for Biotechnology Information) [8].

Statistical analysis

Antimicrobial resistance rates of the isolates were calculated as frequencies and percentages. Comparison of resistance rates between urinary and bacteremic E. coli isolates and also between integron positive and negative isolates was performed using Chi-square test or Fishers exact test, as appropriate, and was considered significant at p < 0.05. All analysis was done using RStudio v 4.3.0.

Results

A total of 470 E. coli isolates were obtained, 361 (76.8%) from urinary sources and 109 (23.1%) from bacteremic sources. Bacteremic isolates demonstrated higher resistance rates to most of the antimicrobial agents tested compared to urinary isolates although a statistically significant difference was noted for antimicrobial agents belonging to cephalosporin class, nalidixic acid, trimethoprim/sulphamethoxazole, and ciprofloxacin.

Class 1 integrons were detected in 66/361 (18.2%) urinary isolates and 26/109 (23.8%) bacteremic isolates. Among the urinary E.coli, isolates harbouring class 1 integrons, demonstrated higher resistance rates to most (12/16, 75%) antimicrobial agents tested as opposed to the isolates not harbouring integrons. Although similar findings were observed in bacteremic isolates, the difference was not statistically significant. The detailed results are presented in Table 1.

VRs of the integrons were characterized using Sangers sequencing technique. Of the 66 integron positive urinary E. coli, the VR was successfully amplified and sequenced in 27 (40.9%) isolates. The most common GC array detected was DfrA17-AadA5 (n = 14/ 27), followed by DfrA5 (n = 4/27) and DfrA12 (n = 3/27). Further details are presented in Table 2. All 25 isolates carrying Dfr GCs were resistant to trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole.

Only 4 (15.4%) of the 26 integron-positive isolates from bacteremic sources had VR. The GC identified was DfrA17. All 4 isolates also were resistant to trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole.

A positive correlation between the presence of integrons, presence of the Dfr genes in their VR, and resistance rates against trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole was noted in isolates from both clinical sources.

Table 1 Comparison of resistance rates of E. coli isolated from urine and blood cultures; and between integron positive and negative isolates from both these sources
Table 2 Gene cassettes detected in integron positive isolates obtained from urine and blood cultures

Discussion

Our results present an important genetic mechanism of antimicrobial resistance, via integrons which can harbour and disseminate resistance genes in the commonest human pathogen E. coli. We found an overall higher antimicrobial resistance rates in bacteremic E. coli compared to urinary E. coli. While class 1 integrons were detected in a higher proportion of bacteremic E. coli, the VR and the GC were relatively more frequent in urinary E. coli. Of all the antimicrobial agents tested, the highest rates of resistance were observed for the drugs belonging to fluoroquinolones, cephalosporins, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors, trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole, and aminoglycosides.

Sufficient molecular findings have shown that AMR is commonly achieved by the acquisition of pre-existing resistance determinants that are amplified as a result of selection pressure. This acquisition is largely due to MGEs, such as integrons, which can promote intracellular and intercellular DNA mobility [11, 12]. The structure of the integron is such that it has a VR flanked by two conserved sequences (CS). The 5’CS includes the intI gene, attI gene, and Pc (required for recombination and expression of GCs), whereas the 3’CS consists of qacEΔ1A gene (conferring resistance to certain detergents), sulI gene (conferring resistance to sulphonamides) and an orf gene (unknown function). The VR in the middle is where the GCs are located [4].

A comprehensive meta-analysis conducted by Halaji et al. (2020) revealed the discrepancy in reports of the prevalence of integrons in E. coli from patients with UTIs. In their review, they noted the prevalence of integrons in UPEC isolates to be between 15% and 90%. This wide range could be due to the origin of isolates and geographical distribution. While it would be difficult to observe a pattern due to differences in methodologies of studies and underreporting, it has been noticed that Asian countries report an average of 54% of UPEC isolates to carry class 1 integrons [13]. In our study, cumulatively, approximately 20% of the isolates were positive for class 1 integrons.

The importance and danger of integrons lie in understanding the reason behind their mobilisation. Most integrase genes carry LexA binding sites close to the promoter region which can be regulated by the LexA protein of the host. This protein is a repressor of the SOS response (physiological stress response) suggesting that induction of SOS could increase transcription of the integrase gene and hence increase activity of the integrase which involves GC rearrangements. It is due to this that the integron system can adapt to environmental changes. The SOS response system controls processes that promote an exchange of GCs and the mobilisation of integrons [4]. In clinical settings, the SOS response is triggered by the use of antibiotics, especially trimethoprim, fluoroquinolones, and beta-lactams which induce integrase expression. The most common GCs identified in our study belong to some of these classes, such as trimethoprim, which emphasises the fact that some antibiotics could directly promote the acquisition and dissemination of resistance determinants.

GCs are small mobile elements (0.5-1 kb) that are non-replicative and are most often found inserted in an integron. Their structure is such that they do not have a promoter, but consist of an open reading frame (ORF) and a cassette recombination site (attC). Production of the site-specific tyrosine recombinase produced by the intI gene in the structure of the integron facilitates recombination between attI site of the integron and attC site of the GC. Promoterless, the GC depends on the Pc of the integron for its expression after acquisition. Multiple GCs can accumulate in an integron (known as an array), however, GCs away from the Pc may not be expressed [3, 4, 12]. High rates of resistance against trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole were observed in our study isolates which could be explained by the inherent presence of the sul1 gene in the integron [3].

The GCs detected in this study belong to gene families that encode for resistance to trimethoprim (Dfr) and aminoglycosides such as streptomycin and spectinomycin (Aad) [9, 10]. The most common GC array in our study was also found to be DfrA17-Aad (51.8%) which can have negative impacts on the therapeutic use of antibiotics. Additionally, detection of the aadA gene present upstream of the dfrA gene corroborates the results of previous studies suggesting that the AadA gene is the first cassette acquired and/or maybe more stable than other GCs [10]. The individual GCs belonging to the Dfr and AadA families detected in our study are also amongst the most commonly observed genes to be found associated with class 1 integrons in clinical isolates which could also indicate the historical selection pressure that was exerted when these drugs were employed more widely in the past [3, 9, 14, 15].

Class 1 integrons have been seen to carry a wide selection of GCs conferring resistance to different classes of drugs [13, 16]. Our study isolates revealed significantly higher rates of resistance (p < 0.05) for most antimicrobial drugs, except ampicillin, ceftriaxone, cefuroxime and gentamicin, in integron-positive compared to integron-negative isolates from urinary sources. Although the GCs conferring resistance to these classes of drugs were not found in the VR of the integrons, it is possible that they were localised outside the integron [3, 9, 14, 16].

A potential reason for the failure of amplification of the VR in some strains could be the absence of the 3’ conserved sequence characterised by the sul1 gene. This could be the case in some isolates that are integron positive but are susceptible to sulphamethoxazole. However, for the majority of isolates, a further genetic exploration is required to explain this. It is also possible that the GCs were excised from the integron structure due to the lack of selection pressure exerted by antibiotic pressure [9, 16, 17].

A limitation of our study is that presence of GCs in the integron structure can only support the resistance patterns of trimethoprim sulphamethoxazole seen in urinary and bacteremic isolates, but cannot explain the entirety of the resistance pattern observed in them. Further detailed genotypic investigations are required to detect presence of these genes elsewhere in the genome of the bacteria. However, through this study, we have understood the prevalence of class 1 integrons in the most common organism associated with urinary tract infections and bacteremia and the potential mechanisms of AMR development and spread.

Conclusion

Integron associated resistance is common against trimethoprim in urinary E. coli. Despite showing higher antimicrobial resistance rates, the bacteremic isolates mostly harboured empty integrons. Regular monitoring of the mechanisms of HGT are essential to develop the AMR control strategies.

Data availability

All data and analysis in this study has been mentioned in the manuscript.

Abbreviations

AMR:

Antimicrobial Resistance

ARG:

Antimicrobial Resistance Genes

AST:

Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing

CS:

Conserved Sequence

GCs:

Gene Cassettes

HGT:

Horizontal Gene Transfer

MALDI-TOF:

Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization–Time-Of-Flight

MGE:

Mobile Genetic Elements

PCR:

Polymerase Chain Reaction

UPEC:

Uropathogenic E. coli

VR:

Variable Region

References

  1. Poirel L, Madec J-Y, Lupo A, Schink A-K, Kieffer N, Nordmann P, et al. Antimicrobial resistance in Escherichia coli. Microbiol Spectr. 2018;6(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.arba-0026-2017.

  2. O’Neill J. Antimicrobial Resistance: tackling a crisis for the health and wealth of nations. Rev Antimicrob Resist. 2016.

  3. Kaushik M, Kumar S, Kapoor RK, Virdi JS, Gulati P. Integrons in Enterobacteriaceae: Diversity, distribution and epidemiology. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2018;51(2):167–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2017.10.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Domingues S, da Silva GJ, Nielsen KM, Integrons. Mob Genetic Elem. 2012;2(5):211–23. https://doi.org/10.4161/mge.22967.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kaushik M, Kumar S, Kapoor RKr, Gulati P. Integrons and antibiotic resistance genes in water-borne pathogens: threat detection and risk assessment. J Med Microbiol. 2019;68(5):679–92. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000972.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Partridge SR, Tsafnat G, Coiera E, Iredell JR. Gene cassettes and cassette arrays in mobile resistance integrons. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2009;33(4):757–84. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6976.2009.00175.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaushik M, Khare N, Kumar S, Gulati P. High prevalence of antibiotic resistance and integrons in Escherichia coli isolated from urban river water, India. Microb Drug Resist. 2019;25(3):359–70. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2018.0194.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). Bethesda (MD): National Library of Medicine (US), National Center for Biotechnology Information 1988. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov. Accessed on 18 February 2024.

  9. Li W, Ma J, Sun X, Liu M, Wang H. Antimicrobial resistance and molecular characterization of gene cassettes from class 1 integrons in Escherichia coli strains. Microb Drug Resist. 2022;28(4):413–8. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2021.0172.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. White PA, McIver CJ, Deng Y-M, Rawlinson WD. Characterisation of two new gene cassettes, aada5 and dfra17. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 2000;182(2):265–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-6968.2000.tb08906.x.

  11. Rozwadowski M, Gawel D. Molecular factors and mechanisms driving multidrug resistance in uropathogenic Escherichia coli—an update. Genes. 2022;13(8):1397. https://doi.org/10.3390/genes13081397.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Partridge SR, Kwong SM, Firth N, Jensen SO. Mobile genetic elements associated with antimicrobial resistance. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2018;31(4). https://doi.org/10.1128/cmr.00088-17.

  13. Halaji M, Feizi A, Mirzaei A, Sedigh Ebrahim-Saraie H, Fayyazi A, Ashraf A, et al. The global prevalence of class 1 integron and associated antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli from patients with urinary tract infections, a systematic review and meta-analysis. Microb Drug Resist. 2020;26(10):1208–18. https://doi.org/10.1089/mdr.2019.0467.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Escudero JA, Loot C, Nivina A, Mazel D. The integron: adaptation on demand. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(2). https://doi.org/10.1128/microbiolspec.mdna3-0019-2014.

  15. Chen M, Wu Y, Yu S, Liu S, Wang Y, Huang D, et al. Drug resistance and integron genes in escherichia coli isolated from urinary tract infection. J Nanosci Nanotechnol. 2019;19(9):5989–93. https://doi.org/10.1166/jnn.2019.16501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Oliveira-Pinto C, Diamantino C, Oliveira PL, Reis MP, Costa PS, Paiva MC, et al. Occurrence and characterization of class 1 integrons in Escherichia coli from healthy individuals and those with urinary infection. J Med Microbiol. 2017;66(5):577–83. https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.000468.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Fluit AC, Schmitz F-J. Resistance integrons and super-integrons. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2004;10(4):272–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1198-743x.2004.00858.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the technician, Ms. Sukanya Shetty, for all the help she has provided.

Funding

This study was supported by the Intramural Fund provided by Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal, Karnataka, India.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GK collected the isolates, performed the experiments and analysed the data. VKE, KB and CM conceptualized, supervised the analysis and reviewed the manuscript. GK and VKE drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vandana Kalwaje Eshwara.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by the Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee (Registration number ECR/146/Inst/KA/2013/RR-19, DHR Registration number EC/NEW/INST/2019/374). The need for consent was waived by the ethics committee [Kasturba Medical College and Kasturba Hospital Institutional Ethics Committee] with approval number 413/2021 as no patient data was recorded or used for analysis.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kumar, G., Balakrishna, K., Mukhopadhyay, C. et al. Comparison of integron mediated antimicrobial resistance in clinical isolates of Escherichia coli from urinary and bacteremic sources. BMC Microbiol 24, 102 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03250-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12866-024-03250-3

Keywords