Skip to main content

Advertisement

Peer review – tips for junior reviewers

Edited by: Dr Sabina Alam and Dr. Jigisha Patel

Peer review of scholarly research articles prior to publication is standard practice for most biomedical journals. The motivation for adhering to these practices lies in the need for editors and journals to operate a high level of quality assurance and to make fair editorial decisions that are not solely dependent on the opinion of one person. However the peer review system is not without limitations. One of the most pressing concerns is the increasing volume of submissions to journals, which in turn places a significant burden upon senior researchers, who find themselves at the receiving end of very frequent requests to review papers.

At the same time, it is important to actively involve junior researchers in the peer review process so that they gain experience. However, a significant proportion of reviewers feel that guidance (56%) and formal training in peer review is needed (68%) [Mulligan, A., & Raphael, E. (2010).Peer review in a changing world—preliminary findings of a global study. Serials, 23(1), 25–34.].

As sourcing appropriate guidance can be challenging, we have commissioned a series of articles from experts in various types of research methodology. These articles aim to provide tips for reviewers on how to ensure they have critically assessed a manuscript. As with all of our journal content, this information is freely available and we hope reviewers will find the advice provided to be useful.

All articles in this collection have been peer reviewed.

  1. Tutorial

    How to review a surgical paper: a guide for junior referees

    Reviewing a surgical manuscript is not an easy task, and there is no formal training available for young referees in the early stage of their careers. Accepting a peer review assignment represents a personal h...

    Philip F. Stahel and Ernest E. Moore

    BMC Medicine 2016 14:29

    Published on: 14 February 2016

  2. Tutorial

    A guide to performing a peer review of randomised controlled trials

    Peer review of journal articles is an important step in the research process. Editors rely on the expertise of peer reviewers to properly assess submissions. Yet, peer review quality varies widely and few rece...

    Chris Del Mar and Tammy C. Hoffmann

    BMC Medicine 2015 13:248

    Published on: 2 November 2015

  3. Editorial

    Peer review: tips from field experts for junior reviewers

    This editorial introduces a series of tutorials by experts, who provide tips and advice for junior reviewers on how to conduct peer review based on specific study designs. The aim of these articles is to provi...

    Sabina Alam and Jigisha Patel

    BMC Medicine 2015 13:269

    Published on: 2 November 2015

Advertisement