Skip to main content

The rise of contract cheating in higher education: academic fraud beyond plagiarism

New Content Item

New Content ItemThis article collection was proposed and developed by the International Journal for Educational Integrity and was published thanks to the support of an educational grant from Turnitin LLC. All published articles were independently prepared by the authors and have undergone peer review in accordance with the journal’s standard policies and processes. Turnitin LLC had no input into the topics covered or the articles themselves. The collection was edited by the Editor-in-Chief of the journal, who declares that they have no competing interests. ​​​​​​​

Edited by 
Tracey Bretag, University of South Australia Business School

The term ‘contract cheating’ was first coined by Clarke and Lancaster (2006). Contract cheating occurs when students employ or use a third party to undertake their assessed work for them.
While clearly not a ‘new’ phenomenon, most commentators agree that there has been a global rise in contract cheating in recent years, across all disciplines. This has raised the level of community concern about the credibility of higher education qualifications and academic outputs, and also changed the nature of research on the topic of academic integrity. Of particular concern is the proliferation of marketing-savvy commercial providers who bombard students via social media, online platforms and other advertising forums about their ‘academic services’.

Educators and researchers agree that contract cheating is qualitatively different than plagiarism, collusion, or the other relatively minor breaches which have been the subject of attention in recent years, and so requires an entirely different approach. Contract cheating is difficult to detect and constitutes a form of fraud. While educational responses have evolved to address longstanding issues of plagiarism, lack of understanding and/or poor academic literacies, education alone is not sufficient to address such a deliberate form of cheating (Bretag & Harper et al., 2016).

The recent explosion in contract cheating has given the international community of academic integrity scholars pause for thought. ‘Contract cheating’ is not the same as the less sinister and more widely accepted practice of ‘ghostwriting’ and has ramifications for individuals’ learning outcomes, institutional reputations, educational standards/credibility, professional practice and public safety, particularly if it is somehow normalised as an acceptable way for academic work to be accomplished.

The thematic series offers the opportunity for this emerging threat to academic integrity to be explored in-depth, and from multiple perspectives, so that meaningful responses and solutions can be instigated.

  1. When considering a paradigm shift in higher education, it is imperative to focus on removing obstacles against maintaining integrity in academia. One such obstacle is contract cheating sites that have mushroom...

    Authors: Zeenath Reza Khan
    Citation: International Journal for Educational Integrity 2022 18:21
  2. Academic education largely concerns knowledge and skills. Where there is attention to ethics, this tends to focus on study-related misconduct such as plagiarising assignments and, more recently, methodological...

    Authors: Thomas Edward Gladwin
    Citation: International Journal for Educational Integrity 2018 14:10
  3. Contract cheating is currently one of the most serious academic integrity issues around the globe. Numerous studies have been conducted, mostly in English speaking countries. So far, no such research has been ...

    Authors: Tomáš Foltýnek and Veronika Králíková
    Citation: International Journal for Educational Integrity 2018 14:4
  4. While there is growing awareness of the existence and activities of Academic Custom Writing websites, which form a small part of the contract cheating industry, how they work remains poorly understood. Very li...

    Authors: Cath Ellis, Ian Michael Zucker and David Randall
    Citation: International Journal for Educational Integrity 2018 14:1
  5. The phenomenon of contract cheating presents, potentially, a serious threat to the quality and standards of Higher Education around the world. There have been suggestions, cited below, to tackle the problem us...

    Authors: Michael J. Draper and Philip M. Newton
    Citation: International Journal for Educational Integrity 2017 13:11
  6. With a definition that is evolving, a serious component of the contract cheating issue involves individuals paying a third-party to complete assessment items for them and then submitting this work as if it wer...

    Authors: Michael Baird and Joseph Clare
    Citation: International Journal for Educational Integrity 2017 13:6
  7. Building on what is known about the non-random nature of crime problems and the explanatory capacity of opportunity theories of crime, this study explores the utility of using existing university administrativ...

    Authors: Joseph Clare, Sonia Walker and Julia Hobson
    Citation: International Journal for Educational Integrity 2017 13:4