Skip to main content

Intervention and implementation research to contextualise AMS and IPC solutions

Edited by:

Annick Lenglet, MSc, MAE, PhD, International Centre for Antimicrobial Resistance Solutions, Denmark
Professor Sabiha Essack, School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa
Tomislav Kostyanev, MD, PhD, MPH, National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Denmark

Submission Status: Open   |  Submission Deadline: 25 April 2025 
 

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control is calling for submissions to our collection on Intervention and implementation research to contextualise AMS and IPC solutions. This collection will focus on the use of intervention and implementation research to contextualise, improve, and inform policy on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions of impact and sustainability in nature. Additionally, submission for this collection can cover any study that has adapted and tested AMS and/or IPC interventions and included outcomes including effectiveness, cost-effectiveness/benefit, feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, cost, sustainability, and uptake.

Image credit: © wladimir1804 Adobe Stock

New Content ItemThis Collection supports and amplifies research related to SDG 3: Good Health and Wellbeing; SDG4: Quality Education; SDG5: Gender Equality; SDG6: Clean Water and Sanitation; SDG10: Reduced Inequalities; SDG17: Partnership for the goals.

About the Collection

Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control is calling for submissions to our collection on Intervention and implementation research to contextualise AMS and IPC solutions. This collection will focus on the use of intervention and implementation research to contextualise, improve, and inform policy on antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) and infection prevention and control (IPC) interventions of impact and sustainability in nature. Additionally, submissions for this collection can cover any study that has adapted and tested AMS and/or IPC interventions and included outcomes including effectiveness, cost-effectiveness/benefit, feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, fidelity, cost, sustainability, and uptake.

The contextualized and tested interventions could range across the antibiotic stewardship and infection, prevention, and control areas of work. They can also include quality improvement studies if they have used an implementation research framework for their methodologies. We will consider both quantitative and qualitative studies and interventions that can be tested in community, primary care, and secondary/tertiary care settings. Ideally, studies can also include how the evidence generated was fed into policy initiatives. We welcome original research, commentaries, and reviews to this collection. Additionally, submissions from low-, middle- and high-income countries, as the methods for intervention and implementation research are universal.

  1. Adherence to infection prevention and control (IPC) standards and guidelines by healthcare workers is essential for reducing the spread of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). However, IPC practices among ...

    Authors: Mengistu Yilma, Girma Taye, Muluwork Tefera, Berhan Tassew, Atalay Mulu Fentie and Workeabeba Abebe
    Citation: Antimicrobial Resistance & Infection Control 2024 13:121

Submission Guidelines

Back to top

This Collection welcomes submission of original research, commentaries, and reviews. Should you wish to submit a different article type, please read our submission guidelines to confirm that type is accepted by the journal. 

Articles for this Collection should be submitted via our submission system, Snapp. Please, select the appropriate Collection title “Intervention and implementation research to contextualise AMS and IPC solutions” under the “Details” tab during the submission stage.

Articles will undergo the journal’s standard peer-review process and are subject to all the journal’s standard policies. Articles will be added to the Collection as they are published.

The Editors have no competing interests with the submissions which they handle through the peer-review process. The peer-review of any submissions for which the Editors have competing interests is handled by another Editorial Board Member who has no competing interests.