Peer Review reports
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
22 Jul 2011 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
5 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pui Kong |
15 Aug 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Falk Naundorf |
16 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Gittoes |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
16 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
19 Sep 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Gittoes |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
19 Sep 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
21 Sep 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Pui Kong |
2 Oct 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Falk Naundorf |
27 Oct 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Gittoes |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
27 Oct 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Resubmission - Version 5 | ||
Submitted | Manuscript version 5 | |
9 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Gittoes |
Resubmission - Version 6 | ||
9 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 6 |
10 Jan 2012 | Author responded | Author comments - Marianne Gittoes |
Resubmission - Version 7 | ||
10 Jan 2012 | Submitted | Manuscript version 7 |
Publishing | ||
13 Jan 2012 | Editorially accepted | |
13 Jan 2012 | Article published | 10.1186/1758-2555-4-4 |
You can find further information about peer review here.