Skip to main content
Download PDF

Serious kidney disease in pregnancy: an Australian national cohort study protocol

BMC Nephrology volume 20, Article number: 230 (2019) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Maternal kidney disease (acute kidney injury (AKI), advanced chronic kidney disease (CKD), dependence on dialysis or a kidney transplant) has a substantial impact on pregnancy, with risks of significant perinatal morbidity. These pregnancies require integrated multidisciplinary care to manage a complex and often challenging clinical situation. The ability to deliver optimal care is currently hindered by a lack of understanding around prevalence, management and outcomes in Australia. This study aims to expand an evidence base to improve clinical care of women with serious kidney impairment in pregnancy.

Methods/design

The “Kidney Disease in Pregnancy Study” is a national prospective cohort study of women with stage 3b-5 CKD (including dialysis and transplant) and severe AKI in pregnancy, using the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System (AMOSS). AMOSS incorporates Australian maternity units with > 50 births/year (n = 260), capturing approximately 96% of Australian births. We will identify women meeting the inclusion criteria who give birth in Australia between 1st August 2017 and 31st July 2018. Case identification will occur via monthly review of all births in Australian AMOSS sites and prospective notification to AMOSS via renal or obstetric clinics. AMOSS data collectors will capture key clinical data via a web-based data collection tool. The data collected will focus on the prevalence, medical and obstetric clinical care, and maternal and fetal outcomes of these high-risk pregnancies.

Discussion

This study will increase awareness of the issue of serious renal impairment in pregnancy through engagement of 260 maternity units and obstetric and renal healthcare providers across the country. The study results will provide an evidence base for pre-pregnancy counselling and development of models of optimal clinical care, clinical guideline and policy development in Australia. Understanding current practices, gaps in care and areas for intervention will improve the care of women with serious renal impairment, women with high-risk pregnancies, their babies and their families.

Peer Review reports

Background

Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) is an under-recognised, serious and increasing major health problem, which disproportionately affects Indigenous peoples and lower socioeconomic groups [1,2,3] . The prevalence of CKD amongst Australian mothers is rising due to the population rise in diabetes, obesity and older age in pregnancy [4]. Over 5% of Australian women of child-bearing age have albuminuria or abnormal estimated GFR (eGFR) indicating CKD [2]. In Australia in 2016, 25% of all women with a functioning renal transplant and 51% of all female incident end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) cases were in women of reproductive age (15–44 years) [5]. Parenthood is a major concern for women with CKD, and women experience important fears and uncertainties about risks to their own and their baby’s health [6, 7]. Women of childbearing age with CKD may face difficult decisions about parenthood while experiencing significant comorbidity and impairment to activities of daily living. Navigating paths to parenthood via complex shared decision-making can be challenging and accurate outcome data would enable evidence-based risk stratification [7].

There is a knowledge gap regarding the burden of CKD in pregnancy in the Australian context. Determining the prevalence of kidney disease in pregnancy has not been easy, due to varying definitions, changing staging systems and poor capture of renal markers (serum creatinine and urine protein) in pregnancy cohorts [8, 9]. The Australia and New Zealand dialysis and transplant registry (ANZDATA) reports pregnancy rates for chronic dialysis and transplant recipients of 3.3/1000 person-years and 20/1000 person-years respectively but is likely under-reported [10,11,12]. Rates of advanced stage CKD (Stage 3b-4), and non-chronic Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) occurring in pregnancy in Australia are unknown. This information is important when developing maternity and renal services.

There is currently no data on how significant kidney disease in pregnancy (CKD stage 3b-5, dialysis, transplant or AKI) impacts upon pregnancy care and how it is managed in Australia. Registry and perinatal datasets currently active in Australia collect some data items and past analyses of the ANZDATA registry have provided some information on pregnancy rates and basic pregnancy outcomes [10, 13]. However, these provide minimal insights into obstetric and perinatal adverse events, therapy and interventions required during pregnancy, models of care delivered, and utilisation of health care resources including hospitalisation and other events.

This knowledge is important to obtain as pregnancy in women with CKD is associated with worse obstetric and perinatal outcomes including preterm birth, small for gestational age, and pre-eclampsia and gestational hypertension [14, 15]. The risk is increased, even in women with Stage 1 CKD [16, 17] and continues to rise as CKD stage advances [15, 18, 19]. Pre-conception eGFR< 40 ml/min, poorly controlled hypertension and proteinuria are factors associated with higher rates of obstetric and perinatal complications [20,21,22,23]. As pre-conception renal function worsens, the risk of “stage shift” or deterioration in renal function also increases, and may necessitate dialysis during pregnancy [9, 24, 25].

Pregnancies in women receiving chronic dialysis are rare due to the reduced fertility of women with advanced kidney failure, and are particularly challenging in terms of maternal care [8]. The recognition that intensive dialysis improves outcomes has led to changes in clinical practice and counselling for women with advanced CKD [19, 24, 26, 27]. Australian women receiving chronic dialysis have a 27% fetal loss rate compared with 7% among all pregnancies [10]. Among live births, 75% are preterm and more than 50% of such babies have birth weights less than the 10th centile [10]. Outcomes are better for women who commence dialysis after conception compared with those who conceive while receiving chronic dialysis [10, 28]. Even after successful kidney transplantation, these pregnancies continue to have high rates of pre-eclampsia (> 25%), prematurity and poor fetal growth (> 50%) [12, 13, 29]. Worse graft function (serum creatinine > 110 μmol/L) during pregnancy can predict risk of pre-eclampsia and kidney function trajectory including significantly higher rates of graft loss within 3 years of giving birth [29].

The incidence of Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) in pregnancy has decreased in recent years in developed countries, mainly due to improvement in peripartum sepsis care [30]. However, AKI still represents a potentially catastrophic event in pregnancy, caused predominantly by pre-eclampsia [31]. There is also enhanced awareness and understanding of newer conditions such as atypical haemolytic uraemic syndrome [32]. AKI in one pregnancy is associated with worse outcomes in the next [33]. Approximately 1/10,000 pregnancies are complicated by AKI that requires dialysis, which was associated with poor perinatal outcomes and increased maternal death rate in one Canadian study [34]. There are no Australian data regarding frequency, causes and outcomes of pregnancy-related AKI, and this remains an important area to investigate.

Severe CKD and AKI in pregnancy, while uncommon, cause a high burden of maternal and perinatal morbidity [14, 15, 34]. A lack of information regarding outcomes for women with these conditions in Australia including the maternal mortality and morbidity, model of care, perinatal outcomes, and access to services, presently limits the health service providers’ ability to counsel and manage affected women. The model of care required for such high risk pregnancies may not be equitably available to all women at higher risk, particularly those who are Indigenous, geographically isolated, from a lower socioeconomic status (SES) or from a culturally and linguistically diverse (CALD) group.

The aim of this study is to determine the Australian prevalence, pregnancy-related and pre-existing maternal and renal morbidity and perinatal outcomes associated with serious maternal kidney disease in pregnancy; and to describe patterns of presentation, pregnancy management and models of care and adequacy of healthcare delivery in these pregnancies. We will achieve this by development of a new framework for capture of maternal and fetal outcomes for cases of significant kidney disease in pregnancy, using the existing Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System (AMOSS) research platform which is embedded in many maternity units across Australia. We hypothesise that mothers with CKD and AKI will have a substantial pregnancy related and pre-existing medical morbidity, and that babies born to these mothers will have higher prematurity and consequent perinatal morbidity. Adverse outcomes may be related to modifiable factors in pre-pregnancy and antenatal care, including access to specialised services, improved blood pressure management and dialysis treatment, fetal surveillance and timing of delivery. The study findings will inform a guideline and policy development and improve counselling for this high risk cohort.

Methods/design

Study objective

Using the existing AMOSS maternity surveillance system embedded in 260 maternity hospitals in Australia we will identify cases of significant CKD (Stage 3b-5 including dialysis and transplant) and severe AKI in pregnancy.

  1. 1.

    To determine the prevalence, and geographical distribution.

  2. 2.

    Utilise survey data to determine pregnancy outcomes (maternal and perinatal), renal outcomes, models of care, and maternity management

Study design

A national, prospective cohort study using the Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System (AMOSS). The AMOSS methods have been described in detail elsewhere [35, 36]. In brief, AMOSS is an established surveillance and research system across maternity units in Australia and New Zealand to study rare but clinically important and severe conditions in pregnancy, which place a disproportionate burden on women, their families and healthcare systems. AMOSS has access to almost all (95% [260/275]) eligible Australian maternity units with more than 50 births/year, capturing an estimated 96% of women giving birth in a hospital in Australia.

Study population, case definition and inclusion criteria

The study population will include all women giving birth in participating Australian AMOSS sites between 1st August 2017 and 31st July 2018. Cases of serious kidney disease giving birth in participating Australian AMOSS sites during the study period will be collected. Table 1 shows the inclusion criteria. Birth is defined as the birth of one or more live or stillborn infants of at least 20 weeks gestation or at least 400 g birthweight. Women not giving birth (e.g. pregnancy ending in miscarriage or termination of pregnancy < 20 weeks gestation) or with early-stage CKD and less severe AKI will be excluded from the study.

Table 1 Inclusion criteria
Full size table

Assessment of renal function in pregnancy – selection of inclusion criteria

Serum creatinine is a widely used marker of renal function in non-pregnant patients, which varies depending on muscle mass, age, and ethnicity. Renal function in non-pregnant patients is evaluated by calculating the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGRF), with formulae derived from populations using gender, age, ethnicity and serum creatinine measurement. The eGFR is most commonly calculated using the CKD-EPI formula and is routinely provided when reporting serum creatinine in the adult population by laboratories in Australia [37]. However, eGFR formulae are not valid for use during pregnancy, where serum creatinine usually falls due to renal physiological changes, and where a serum creatinine > 80-90 mmol/L usually reflects a degree of renal impairment. Therefore, in this study, eGFR will only be used for pre-pregnancy serum creatinine values. As shown in Table 2, in women aged 18–45 years, a pre-pregnancy serum creatinine of 130–150 micromol/L or more will reflect eGFR < 45 ml/min/1.73m2 (CKD Stage 3b or higher) [38]. The data collector will obtain pre-pregnancy serum creatinine measurements wherever available, for all cases.

Table 2 Pre-pregnancy serum creatinine and eGFR
Full size table

AMOSS data collectors based in each AMOSS participating site will complete two web-based data collection forms for all women who fulfil the inclusion criteria for the study (Fig. 1). The first survey form is the general AMOSS data collection form utilised in all AMOSS studies, obtaining demographic characteristics such as maternal age, hospital sector, comorbidity, smoking, and BMI, and captured data on medical and obstetric history, obstetric interventions and information about type of care, and location of care. In addition this general survey collects information regarding baby outcomes including birth status, gestation, gender, birthweight, admission to intensive or specialised care units, congenital abnormalities, and neonatal morbidity and mortality (Additional file 1).

Fig. 1
figure 1

AMOSS surveillance and data collection workflow. *Hospital case identification. Clinical management/Hospital based obstetric and other information systems. Morbidity and/or clinical review meetings. Direct and indirect notification

Full size image

The second survey has been developed for this study will capture specific renal information (Additional file 2):

  1. 1.

    General renal history: presentation; the underlying cause of kidney disease; primary diagnosis including kidney biopsy; biochemical data; proteinuria; blood pressure; details of kidney disease management; timing and model of antenatal care; and access to specialist obstetric, obstetric medicine and nephrology services.

  2. 2.

    Transplant history: transplant source; transplant biopsy; anti-rejection treatment and therapeutic monitoring.

  3. 3.

    Dialysis: commencement of dialysis during pregnancy; dialysis modality; vascular access and complications.

  4. 4.

    Medication and other therapies: medication used prior to pregnancy; details of antihypertensive and immunosuppressant medications.

  5. 5.

    Antenatal, birth and postpartum care: blood pressure measurements; antenatal screening and fetal growth scans; antenatal events, including diagnoses of pre-eclampsia, placental abruption; blood transfusion; and birth and post-partum management.

Study outcomes

Primary outcomes: Prevalence rates of maternal AKI and CKD in the general AMOSS birth (live or stillbirths) cohort as per inclusion criteria. The rate will be expressed as per 1000 maternities based on birth rates for AMOSS hospitals during the study period.

Secondary outcomes will include: 1) Maternal obstetric outcomes and complications – a range of outcomes during antenatal, delivery and post-partum stages; 2) Maternal renal outcomes including renal function, graft function and commencement of dialysis; 3) Adequacy and complications of dialysis therapy; 4) Transplant-related complications including graft dysfunction and infection; 5) Perinatal outcomes including birth outcomes and adverse outcomes especially related to preterm birth (Additional file 3).

Data collection

Electronic survey data will be collected via an encrypted web-based data management system (the ‘AMOSS system’). Record data will be kept on a secure server with daily backup to an offsite facility. Where a data collector is not able to complete a survey using the web-based survey system, they may handwrite survey responses using the PDF versions of surveys, and scan/send to AMOSS where the survey will be entered on their behalf by the AMOSS team.

AMOSS provides continuous education and support for data collectors before the start of data collection. This is achieved by disseminating the renal study protocol using the AMOSS newsletter, emails, phone calls and presentations at hospitals and conferences. The AMOSS team and investigators will provide support for all data collectors regarding enquiries during the study via emails, phone calls or site visits as requested.

Participant identification

We will identify study participants through multiple sources: AMOSS surveillance; notification from nephrologists, obstetric physicians and obstetricians; audit committees; and review of routine data collection within hospitals.

Sample size

Based on current international literature, which estimates CKD Stage 3b-5 rate of 2 to 12 per 10,000; severe AKI requiring dialysis as 1 per 10,000 pregnancies; estimated 295,530 births ≥20 weeks gestation/year in participating Australian AMOSS sites [34, 39,40,41]; and allowing for potential early pregnancy losses; we estimate identifying between 89 and 384 cases in 1 year.

Statistical analysis

We anticipate our analysis will largely utilise descriptive statistics (frequency (percentage) for categorical data and mean (standard deviation) or median (interquartile range) for continuous data) will be used to summarise the demographic characteristics, kidney disease data, maternal and baby outcomes of women with advanced CKD, dialysis, transplant and AKI. Cases will be reviewed in depth to map patient care models. Maternal and baby outcomes will be compared with Australian norms. If sample size allows, odds ratios will be estimated via logistic regression for outcomes and adjusted for relevant parameters including demographic data (maternal age, ethnicity); renal function, proteinuria and blood pressure at conception; time from commencement of dialysis or transplant; and dialysis modality and hours (Additional file 4). Variables associated with outcomes in the univariable analysis (p < 0.2) and other factors identified in the literature as potentially predictive will be entered into multivariable logistic regression models. Final models will be determined by taking into account the final sample size for each study group, likely causal pathway, collinearity, and clinical significance. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) and generalised linear models will be used to examine the change in maternal kidney function during pregnancy. We will examine the distribution and pattern of missing data for key study and outcome factors with high proportion of missing data. Multiple imputation will be performed for variables qualified as ‘missing at random’ [42]. For variables with pattern of missing data unlikely to be ‘missing at random’, a ‘proxy’ category for missing data will be created for variables with > 2% missing and a sensitivity analysis will be conducted to explore the effect of missing data. A p-value < 0.05 or a confidence interval not including unity will be considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses will be performed using SPSS 24.0 software (Armonk, NY, USA: IBM Corp.).

Discussion

This AMOSS study will highlight the issue of serious kidney disease in pregnancy in Australia, with heightened awareness in approximately 260 maternity units and among obstetric and renal healthcare providers across the country. The study will focus on cases of serious kidney disease in pregnancy that, while uncommon, can cause significant morbidity for mothers and babies, present clinical complexity for clinicians, and place a disproportionate burden on health care resources. The study will fill an important knowledge gap on the prevalence and models of care for this high-risk cohort of women.

The strengths of this study come from the AMOSS research model, which encompasses 96% of hospital births in Australia, and where cases can be identified prospectively and data collected after birth. In addition, multiple sources to identify eligible participants will increase the ability to capture cases, thereby minimising missed cases. The main challenge in this study will be the data collection for women who (1) receive their obstetric and renal care at different locations, or (2) receive renal care at a non-AMOSS site. To overcome these challenges, ethics approval was granted at most sites for the AMOSS Project Coordinator to receive minimal identifying details of prospective patients receiving renal care at one site and pass those details on to the onsite AMOSS data collector at the woman’s maternity hospital. For women receiving renal care at a non-AMOSS site, separate ethical and/or governance approval for data collection at the specialist clinic and matching with maternity data will be sought on a case-by-case basis.

The results of this study will be immediately relevant and enable translation into clinical practice. Specifically, we will.

  1. a)

    Improve the evidence base for pre-pregnancy counselling and pregnancy management, and will promote this as an important pathway towards improved outcomes. We will identify healthcare professional groups to target for strategic education in specialist and primary care, and mechanisms to target high-risk women antenatally. Previous AMOSS studies have led to important improvements in safety and quality of care for pregnant women suffering from rare and under-studied conditions, where there is often a lack of data and clinical experience to guide management.

  2. b)

    Promote clinical guideline and policy development in Australia by providing an evidence base describing current models of care, and highlighting gaps in care or risk factors for adverse outcomes. Currently, there are no Australian guidelines or policies to facilitate delivery of specialised pregnancy care to women with renal disease.

  3. c)

    Disseminate our findings to key stakeholders (clinical providers - medical, midwifery, nursing, allied health, government policy planners and patient/consumer groups) involved in the care of women with CKD and AKI, women with high-risk pregnancy, their babies and their families. We will develop resources for health providers and patients through engagement with renal and pregnancy consumer organisations.

  4. d)

    Use this study to form the foundation for developing new systems for ongoing data capture regarding maternal kidney disease, including the potential to re-purpose the data collection instrument into an ongoing registry.

Given that no other studies have explored serious maternal kidney disease in the Australian birth cohort, we anticipate the results will be of great interest to the obstetric and renal community nationally and internationally.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

AKI:

Acute Kidney Injury

AMOSS:

Australasian Maternity Outcomes Surveillance System

BMI:

Body Mass Index

CKD:

Chronic Kidney Disease

eGFR:

Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate

References

  1. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, 39th Annual Report [http://www.anzdata.org.au/v1/report_2016.html] accessed 18 October 2017.

  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare: Cardiovascular disease, diabetes and chronic kidney disease—Australian facts: Prevalence and incidence. Cardiovascular, diabetes and chronic kidney disease series no. 2. Cat. no. CDK 2. In. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.

  3. Dharmarajan SH, Bragg-Gresham JL, Morgenstern H, Gillespie BW, Li Y, Powe NR, Tuot DS, Banerjee T, Burrows NR, Rolka DB, et al. State-level awareness of chronic kidney disease in the U.S. Am J Prev Med. 2017;53(3):300–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hilder L, Zhichao Z, Parker M, Jahan S, Chambers G. Australia's mothers and babies 2012. Perinatal statistics series no. 30. Cat. no. PER 69. Canberra: AIHW; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Australia and New Zealand Dialysis and Transplant Registry, 40th Annual Report [http://www.anzdata.org.au/v1/report_2017.html] accessed 22 May 2018.

  6. Tong A, Brown MA, Winkelmayer WC, Craig JC, Jesudason S. Perspectives on pregnancy in women with CKD: a Semistructured interview study. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(6):951–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tong A, Jesudason S, Craig JC, Winkelmayer WC. Perspectives on pregnancy in women with chronic kidney disease: systematic review of qualitative studies. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2015;30(4):652–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Fitzpatrick A, Mohammadi F, Jesudason S. Managing pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: improving outcomes for mother and baby. Int J Women's Health. 2016;8:273–85.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Piccoli GB, Cabiddu G, Attini R, Vigotti FN, Maxia S, Lepori N, Tuveri M, Massidda M, Marchi C, Mura S, et al. Risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes in women with CKD. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(8):2011–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jesudason S, Grace BS, McDonald SP. Pregnancy outcomes according to dialysis commencing before or after conception in women with ESRD. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;9(1):143–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shahir AK, Briggs N, Katsoulis J, Levidiotis V. An observational outcomes study from 1966-2008, examining pregnancy and neonatal outcomes from dialysed women using data from the ANZDATA registry. Nephrology (Carlton). 2013;18(4):276–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wyld ML, Clayton PA, Jesudason S, Chadban SJ, Alexander SI. Pregnancy outcomes for kidney transplant recipients. Am J Transplant. 2013;13(12):3173–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Levidiotis V, Chang S, McDonald S. Pregnancy and maternal outcomes among kidney transplant recipients. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;20(11):2433–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Bharti J, Vatsa R, Singhal S, Roy KK, Kumar S, Perumal V, Meena J. Pregnancy with chronic kidney disease: maternal and fetal outcome. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016;204:83–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cabiddu G, Castellino S, Gernone G, Santoro D, Moroni G, Giannattasio M, Gregorini G, Giacchino F, Attini R, Loi V, et al. A best practice position statement on pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: the Italian study group on kidney and pregnancy. J Nephrol. 2016;29(3):277–303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Piccoli GB, Arduino S, Attini R, Parisi S, Fassio F, Biolcati M, Pagano A, Bossotti C, Vasario E, Borgarello V, et al. Multiple pregnancies in CKD patients: an explosive mix. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013;8(1):41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Zhang JJ, Ma XX, Hao L, Liu LJ, Lv JC, Zhang H. A systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes of pregnancy in CKD and CKD outcomes in pregnancy. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;10(11):1964–78.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nevis IF, Reitsma A, Dominic A, McDonald S, Thabane L, Akl EA, Hladunewich M, Akbari A, Joseph G, Sia W, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with chronic kidney disease: a systematic review. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011;6(11):2587–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Piccoli GB, Attini R, Vasario E, Conijn A, Biolcati M, D'Amico F, Consiglio V, Bontempo S, Todros T. Pregnancy and chronic kidney disease: a challenge in all CKD stages. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2010;5(5):844–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Bramham K, Briley AL, Seed PT, Poston L, Shennan AH, Chappell LC. Pregnancy outcome in women with chronic kidney disease: a prospective cohort study. Reprod Sci. 2011;18(7):623–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Imbasciati E, Gregorini G, Cabiddu G, Gammaro L, Ambroso G, Del Giudice A, Ravani P. Pregnancy in CKD stages 3 to 5: fetal and maternal outcomes. Am J Kidney Dis. 2007;49(6):753–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jones DC, Hayslett JP. Outcome of pregnancy in women with moderate or severe renal insufficiency. N Engl J Med. 1996;335(4):226–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Kendrick J, Sharma S, Holmen J, Palit S, Nuccio E, Chonchol M. Kidney disease and maternal and fetal outcomes in pregnancy. Am J Kidney Dis. 2015;66(1):55–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Hladunewich MA, Melamad N, Bramham K. Pregnancy across the spectrum of chronic kidney disease. Kidney Int. 2016;89(5):995–1007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Piccoli GB, Cabiddu G, Attini R, Vigotti F, Fassio F, Rolfo A, Giuffrida D, Pani A, Gaglioti P, Todros T. Pregnancy in chronic kidney disease: questions and answers in a changing panorama. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015;29(5):625–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Alkhunaizi A, Melamed N, Hladunewich MA. Pregnancy in advanced chronic kidney disease and end-stage renal disease. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 2015;24(3):252–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hladunewich MA, Hou S, Odutayo A, Cornelis T, Pierratos A, Goldstein M, Tennankore K, Keunen J, Hui D, Chan CT. Intensive hemodialysis associates with improved pregnancy outcomes: a Canadian and United States cohort comparison. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2014;25(5):1103–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Luders C, Castro MC, Titan SM, De Castro I, Elias RM, Abensur H, Romao JE Jr. Obstetric outcome in pregnant women on long-term dialysis: a case series. Am J Kidney Dis. 2010;56(1):77–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mohammadi FA, Borg M, Gulyani A, McDonald SP, Jesudason S. Pregnancy outcomes and impact of pregnancy on graft function in women after kidney transplantation. Clin Transpl. 2017;31(10).

  30. Stratta P, Besso L, Canavese C, Grill A, Todros T, Benedetto C, Hollo S, Segoloni GP. Is pregnancy-related acute renal failure a disappearing clinical entity? Ren Fail. 1996;18(4):575–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jim B, Garovic VD. Acute kidney injury in pregnancy. Semin Nephrol. 2017;37(4):378–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Fakhouri F, Deltombe C. Pregnancy-related acute kidney injury in high income countries: still a critical issue. J Nephrol. 2017;30(6):767–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Tangren JS, Powe CE, Ankers E, Ecker J, Bramham K, Hladunewich MA, Karumanchi SA, Thadhani R. Pregnancy outcomes after clinical recovery from AKI. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(5):1566–74.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Hildebrand AM, Liu K, Shariff SZ, Ray JG, Sontrop JM, Clark WF, Hladunewich MA, Garg AX. Characteristics and outcomes of AKI treated with Dialysis during pregnancy and the postpartum period. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015;26(12):3085–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Farquhar CM, Li Z, Lensen S, McLintock C, Pollock W, Peek MJ, Ellwood D, Knight M, Homer CS, Vaughan G, et al. Incidence, risk factors and perinatal outcomes for placenta accreta in Australia and New Zealand: a case-control study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(10):e017713.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sullivan EA, Javid N, Duncombe G, Li Z, Safi N, Cincotta R, Homer CSE, Halliday L, Oyelese Y. Vasa Previa diagnosis, clinical practice, and outcomes in Australia. Obstet Gynecol. 2017;130(3):591–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Johnson DW, Jones GR, Mathew TH, Ludlow MJ, Doogue MP, Jose MD, Langham RG, Lawton PD, McTaggart SJ, Peake MJ, et al. Chronic kidney disease and automatic reporting of estimated glomerular filtration rate: new developments and revised recommendations. Med J Aust. 2012;197(4):224–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. KDIGO. KDIGO 2012 clinical practice guideline for the evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney Int Suppl. 2013;3(1):1–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s mothers and babies 2014—in brief. Perinatal statistics series no. 32. Cat no. per 87. Canberra: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare; 2016.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kapoor N, Makanjuola D, Shehata H. Management of women with chronic renal disease in pregnancy. Obstet Gynaecol. 2009;11(3):185–91.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Williams D, Davison J. Chronic kidney disease in pregnancy. BMJ. 2008;336(7637):211–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Sterne JAC, White IR, Carlin JB, Spratt M, Royston P, Kenward MG, Wood AM, Carpenter JR. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338.

  43. Geraldine Vaughan, Wendy Pollock, Michael J. Peek, Marian Knight, David Ellwood, Caroline S. Homer, Lisa Jackson Pulver, Claire McLintock, Maria T. Ho, Elizabeth A. Sullivan. Ethical issues: The multi-centre low-risk ethics/governance review process and AMOSS. Aust New Zeal J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;52(2):195–203

Download references

Acknowledgements

AMOSS participating sites and data collectors, and former AMOSS assistant, Kirisha Turnbull.

Funding

Royal Adelaide Hospital Research Fund 2016 Clinical Project Grant. The funding body had no role in study design, data collection, data analysis, data interpretation, or manuscript writing.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Health, University of Technology Sydney, 235 Jones Street Ultimo, Sydney, NSW, 2007, Australia

    Nadom Safi, Elizabeth Sullivan, Zhuoyang Li & Angela M. O’Brien

  2. Faculty of Health and Medicine, University of Newcastle, 130 University Drive, Callaghan, 2308, NSW, Australia

    Elizabeth Sullivan

  3. Department Renal Medicine and Medicine, St. George Hospital and University of New South Wales, Kogarah, Sydney, Australia

    Mark Brown

  4. Robinson Research Institute, University of Adelaide, Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Adelaide, 5006, SA, Australia

    William Hague

  5. ANZDATA Registry, South Australia Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia

    Stephen McDonald

  6. Adelaide Medical School, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Stephen McDonald & Shilpanjali Jesudason

  7. Central and Northern Adelaide Renal and Transplantation Service (CNARTS), Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, SA, Australia

    Stephen McDonald & Shilpanjali Jesudason

  8. The Canberra Hospital, The Australian National University, Bdg 11, Level 2, Yamba Dve, Garran, Canberra, 2605, ACT, Australia

    Michael J. Peek

  9. University of Western Sydney and the University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Angela Makris

Authors
  1. Nadom Safi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizabeth Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhuoyang Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Mark Brown
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. William Hague
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Stephen McDonald
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Michael J. Peek
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Angela Makris
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Angela M. O’Brien
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Shilpanjali Jesudason
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

NS, ES, ZL, MB, WH, SM, MP, AM, AO, and SJ conceived the research question, designed the study protocol and reviewed and approved the manuscript. NS, ES, ZL, AO and SJ managed the operation of the study. NS, ZL and SJ drafted the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Sullivan.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Ethics approval for this study (Ref: HREC/09/CIPHS/21) was granted on 29 July 2016 by NSW Population and Health Services Research Ethics Committee and multiple Human Research Ethics Committees across Australia [43]. Consent is not obtained from individual women participating in the study, as their identity will not be disclosed. Individual sites granted their consent to collect and provide to AMOSS summarised non-identifiable data after an event has occurred. In addition, no photos or videos of participants are collected. Consent from participants was requested to be waived from and approved by the NSW Population & Health HREC and other ethics committees.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Additional files

Additional file 1:

General Information: Case report form is used to collect general maternal and neonatal data. (PDF 411 kb)

Additional file 2:

Renal Disease in Pregnancy: Case report form is used to collect data specifically related to renal disease in pregnancy. (PDF 511 kb)

Additional file 3:

Main outcome measurements: A list of the main outcome measures that will form the basis of data analysis. (DOCX 12 kb)

Additional file 4:

Selected covariates: The list of variables that we expect to be associated with the outcomes. (DOCX 13 kb)

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Safi, N., Sullivan, E., Li, Z. et al. Serious kidney disease in pregnancy: an Australian national cohort study protocol. BMC Nephrol 20, 230 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1393-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12882-019-1393-z

Keywords

BMC Nephrology

ISSN: 1471-2369

Contact us