Log on / register
Feedback
|
Support
|
My details
home
|
journals A-Z
|
subject areas
|
advanced search
|
authors
|
reviewers
|
libraries
|
about
|
my BioMed Central
How do we know that research ethics committees are really working? The neglected role of outcomes assessment in research ethics review.
Coleman CH, Bouësseau MC
BMC Med Ethics
2008,
9
:6
[
Full text
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Related articles
]
[
Cited on BioMed Central
]
printer friendly
20 per page
50 per page
200 per page
500 per page
selected items
abstract
no abstract
any time period
7 Days
14 Days
30 Days
60 Days
90 Days
180 Days
1 Year
all 1 results
this page
selected items
to
Endnote (no abstracts)
Endnote + abstracts
Ref. Manager (no abstracts)
Ref. Manager + abstracts
RefWorks (no abstracts)
RefWorks + abstracts
BibTeX (no abstracts)
BibTeX + abstracts
ProCite (no abstracts)
ProCite + abstracts
[
Help
]
PubMed Central articles that cite the above article:
1.
Reasons for resubmission of research projects to the research ethics committee of a university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil.
Bueno M, Brevidelli MM, Cocarelli T, dos Santos GM, Ferraz MA, Mion D
Clinics (Sao Paulo)
2009,
64
:831-6
[
PubMed Central
]
[
PubMed
]
[
Related articles
]
This article is also cited by
1 article
in BioMed Central
printer friendly
20 per page
50 per page
200 per page
500 per page
selected items
abstract
no abstract
any time period
7 Days
14 Days
30 Days
60 Days
90 Days
180 Days
1 Year
all 1 results
this page
selected items
to
Endnote (no abstracts)
Endnote + abstracts
Ref. Manager (no abstracts)
Ref. Manager + abstracts
RefWorks (no abstracts)
RefWorks + abstracts
BibTeX (no abstracts)
BibTeX + abstracts
ProCite (no abstracts)
ProCite + abstracts
[
Help
]
Terms and Conditions
Privacy statement
Information for advertisers
Jobs at BMC
Contact us
© 1999-2009 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated. Part of
Springer Science+Business Media
.