Log on / register
Feedback | Support | My details
Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group.
Atkins D, Eccles M, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Henry D, Hill S, Liberati A, O'Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schünemann H, Edejer TT, Vist GE, Williams JW, GRADE Working Group
BMC Health Serv Res 2004 Dec 22, 4:38
[Full text] [PubMed] [Related articles] [Cited on BioMed Central]


printer friendly 
to  [Help]

PubMed Central articles that cite the above article:

1.
Prevalence of depression in survivors of acute myocardial infarction.
Thombs BD, Bass EB, Ford DE, Stewart KJ, Tsilidis KK, Patel U, Fauerbach JA, Bush DE, Ziegelstein RC
J Gen Intern Med 2006 Jan, 21:30-8
[PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]

2.
How evidence-based are the recommendations in evidence-based guidelines?
McAlister FA, van Diepen S, Padwal RS, Johnson JA, Majumdar SR
PLoS Med 2007 Aug, 4:e250
[PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]

3.
*** Unable to retrieve article 17683197 ***

[PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]

4.
GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist GE, Kunz R, Falck-Ytter Y, Alonso-Coello P, Schünemann HJ, GRADE Working Group
BMJ 2008 Apr 26, 336:924-6
[PubMed Central] [PubMed] [Related articles]


This article is also cited by 10 articles in BioMed Central


You can also check ISI Web of Science for additional citations (subscription required)
printer friendly 
to  [Help]

© 1999-2008 BioMed Central Ltd unless otherwise stated